Research Article |
Corresponding author: Gökhan Kalaycı ( gokhan.kalayci@erdogan.edu.tr ) Academic editor: Nicolas Hubert
© 2022 Gökhan Kalaycı.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Kalaycı G (2022) Pliocene-Pleistocene dispersal bring along low inter species diversity between Vimba species based on multilocus analysis. Zoosystematics and Evolution 98(1): 65-75. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.98.76937
|
This study investigates phylogenetic and phylogeographic relationships of Vimba species using mitochondrial cytochrome b (cyt b) (1023 bp) and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) barcoding region (652 bp) genes. Ninety-one samples from 36 populations for the cyt b gene and 67 samples from 20 populations for the COI were analyzed. We identified 29 haplotypes and calculated overall haplotype diversity as Hd: 0.907 ± 0.015 for cyt b. We also identified 13 COI haplotypes and calculated overall haplotype diversity as 0.826 ± 0.026 for this marker. The phylogenetic analysis of Vimba species reveals the presence of four clades, based on concatenated cyt b and COI sequences. The first and second clade consist of Vimba vimba Western lineage, and Vimba vimba Caspian lineage, while the third and fourth clade consist of Vimba mirabilis and Vimba melanops. Based on haplotype network analyses and phylogeographic inferences, the Vimba genus is monophyletic, and its species dispersed in the Pleistocene era.
cyt b, genetic diversity, Phylogeography, Vimba bream, Vimba mirabilis
As a member of the Leuciscidae family, the genus Vimba is distributed throughout almost all Eurasia and consists of three species: Vimba vimba, Vimba melanops, and Vimba mirabilis. V. vimba was initially described as Cyprinus vimba L. from several Swedish lakes in Scandinavia, the North Sea, coastal waters of Baltic Sea basins, and, subsequently, after the description, it was also found in the Caspian, Black Sea, Marmara Sea basins, and the Rhine River. In Anatolia, V. vimba is distributed from the Marmara basin up to Büyük Menderes, Eğirdir Lake, Köprüçay and Eşen rivers in the south, and Kızılırmak in the east. V. melanops was described initially from the Meriç (Evros) River and its distribution now extends within the borders of Turkey, Greece, Bulgaria, and Macedonia in the North Aegean basin from Meriç to the Pinios River. The Anatolian endemic V. mirabilis was detected only in the type locality Büyük Menderes and two individuals in Bafa Lake in Southwest Anatolia (
Since then, a few taxonomic developments of the genus Vimba have occurred, like the subalpine Vimba lineage previously identified as Vimba elongata, but now considered a synonym of Vimba vimba. Acanthobrama mirabilis was synonymized with Vimba vimba tenella by
Globally, Vimba genus has been well studied in terms of growth parameters and its parasites, but genetic studies are more limited (
Phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies have been made on some European freshwater fishes such as Alburnoides, Barbus, Capoeta, Gobio, Squalius, Telestes and typically uncovered distinct patterns according to mitochondrial cytochrome b (cyt b) and cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) genes. In order to study systematics and phylogeny of Leuciscidae and its congeners, cyt b and COI sequence analysis have been demonstrated to be useful DNA markers. (
In European rivers, freshwater fishes have largely colonized the Black Sea upstream, up rivers such as the Dnieper and the Danube. Freshwater fishes contain numerous lineages with genetic divergences representing separation over the past 2 Myr in this region. Several of these have clear geographic distributions and provide evidence of older Black Sea-Caspian Sea divergence. Interglacial and postglacial expansions also indicate colonization of Western Europe from numerous major refugia, particularly the Black Sea, Dnieper-Volga, Danube, Rhine– Rhone, Elbe, and other rivers. The influence of older water bodies such as the Ponto-Caspian Sea and recent great periglacial lakes and floods is also apparent (
While it frequently highlighted that the Pleistocene increased speciation rates, molecular data have recently revealed that species diverged in the Pleistocene and Pliocene in Europe (
In the current study, mtDNA sequences were used (cyt b, COI barcoding) to examine the biogeography of Vimba populations, applying a phylogeographic approach. The objective is to reveal the phylogenetic relationships and genetic diversity of Vimba species whose populations are currently decreasing.
All currently recognized taxa of Vimba were included in our dataset. We sequenced 68 Vimba specimens collected from their distribution ranges in Turkey and further included sequences of 23 specimens from NCBI GenBank. Vimba species of Turkey were collected from 14 sampling sites of drainages of the Black and Aegean and Marmara seas, comprising type localities or type basins (Fig.
List of sequences analyzed in this study with information on drainage, GenBank no, haplotype no, and country of origin.
Locality no | Species | Locality | Coordinate | cyt b | COI | Reference | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Genbank no | Haplotype no | N | Genbank no | Haplotype no | |||||
1 | Vimba vimba | Kırmir stream, Ankara, Turkey | 40°14'10.5"N, 32°15'41.2"E | 7 | OK493404 | H1 | 3 | OK444821 | H7 | This study |
2 | Vimba vimba | Binkılıç stream, Black sea, Istanbul, Turkey | 41°22'48.3"N, 28°17'46.0"E | 9 | OK493404, OK493407, OK493408 | H1,H4,H5 | 8 | OK444820 | H6 | This study |
3 | Vimba vimba | Koca stream, Balıkesir, Turkey | 39°46'55.2"N, 27°35'46.2"E | 4 | OK493404, OK493406, OK493409 | H1,H3,H6 | 4 | OK444820, OK444821 | H6, H7 | This study |
4 | Vimba vimba | Koca çayı stream, Çanakkale, Turkey | 39°48'52.9"N, 27°13'46.1"E | 3 | OK493405, OK493406 | H2,H3 | 3 | OK444820, OK444821 | H6, H7 | This study |
5 | Vimba vimba | Aydınlar stream, Zonguldak, Turkey | 41°13'47.1"N, 31°27'11.2"E | 2 | OK493410 | H7 | This study | |||
6 | Vimba vimba | Aksu stream, Düzce, Turkey | 40°45'49.0"N, 30°57'43.0"E | 3 | OK493411 | H8 | This study | |||
7 | Vimba vimba | Büyük Melen stream, Düzce, Turkey | 40°50'08.0"N, 31°06'35.0"E | 4 | OK493411 | H8 | This study | |||
8 | Vimba vimba | Yenice stream, Zonguldak, Turkey | 41°20'27.6"N, 32°04'40.8"E | 5 | OK493410 | H7 | This study | |||
9 | Vimba vimba | Çayagzı stream, Düzce, Turkey | 41°05'27.2"N, 31°13'18.5"E | 3 | OK493410, OK493411 | H7,H8 | This study | |||
10 | Vimba vimba | Iznik lake, Kocaeli, Turkey | 40°26'18.1"N, 29°38'03.5"E | 10 | OK493406 | H3 | This study | |||
11 | Vimba vimba | Suat Ugurlu Dam lake, Samsun, Turkey | 41°01'52.4"N, 36°38'33.4"E | 2 | OK493412, OK493413 | H9,H10 | This study | |||
12 | Vimba vimba | Curonian Lagoon, Baltic Sea basin, Lithuania | 55°42'18.0"N, 20°00'00.0"E | 1 | GQ279763 | H11 |
|
|||
13 | Vimba vimba | Danube I, Black Sea basin Germany | 48°53'24.0"N, 11°48'54.0"E | 1 | GQ279762 | H12 |
|
|||
14 | Vimba vimba | Elbe, North Sea basin, Germany | 51°28'30.0"N, 11°58'01.2"E | 1 | GQ279761 | H13 |
|
|||
15 | Vimba vimba | Olandsan, Baltic Sea basin, Sweden | 60°20'24.0"N, 17°31'19.2"E | 1 | GQ279756 | H14 |
|
|||
16 | Vimba vimba | Mondsee, Danube, Black Sea basin, Germany | 47°49'40.8"N, 13°23'02.4"E | 2 | GQ279755, AY026405 | H18 |
|
|||
17 | Vimba vimba | Eder, Weser, North Sea basin, Germany | 51°09'18.0"N, 8°54'07.2"E | 1 | GQ279755 | H18 |
|
|||
18 | Vimba vimba | Tuzlov, Don, Sea of Azov basin, Russia | 49°58'58.8"N, 42°01'04.8"E | 1 | GQ279751 | H15 |
|
|||
19 | Vimba vimba | Seversky, Donetz Don, Sea of Azov basin, Russia | 47°37'37.2"N, 40°53'16.8"E | 1 | GQ279751 | H15 |
|
|||
20 | Vimba vimba | Samur, Caspian Sea basin Russia | 41°52'26.8"N, 48°33'34.9"E | 1 | GQ279765 | H16 |
|
|||
21 | Vimba vimba | Sea of Azov, Sea of Azov basin Ukraine | 46°03'50.4"N, 36°36'54.0"E | 2 | GQ279754, GQ279752 | H1 H3 |
|
|||
22 | Vimba vimba | Kuban, Sea of Azov basin, Russia | 45°11'56.4"N, 37°42'54.0"E | 1 | GQ279753 | H10 |
|
|||
23 | Vimba vimba | Tsymlyansk Reservoir, Don, Sea of Azov basin, Russia | 47°45'56.2"N, 42°49'18.8"E | 1 | GQ279751 | H15 |
|
|||
24 | Vimba vimba | Dagomys, northeastern Black Sea basin, Russia | 43°40'01.2"N, 39°39'07.2"E | 1 | GQ279750 | H3 |
|
|||
25 | Vimba vimba | Libechovka river, Elbe basin, Czech Republic | 50°28'45.0"N, 14°29'07.5"E, (predict) | 1 | HM560237 | H17 | 1 | HM560383 | H6 |
|
26 | Vimba vimba | Bashly-chai, Caspian Sea Basin, Russia | 42°20'37.0"N, 48°05'30.8"E | 1 | GQ279765 | H16 |
|
|||
27 | Vimba vimba | Lake Sapanca, Sakarya, Turkey | 40°43'14"N, 30°17'41"E | 20 | KC501853-KC501872 | H13 | Keskin & Atar 2013 | |||
28 | Vimba vimba | Gönen drainage, Çanakkale, Turkey | 39°56'45.6"N, 27°20'13.2"E | 2 | KJ554799, KJ554924 | H11, H12 |
|
|||
29 | Vimba vimba | Egirdir Lake, Isparta, Turkey | 38°02'00.9"N, 30°52'24.3"E (predict) | 2 | MW940905, MW940906 | H10, H6 | Eren,H. (unp.) | |||
30 | Vimba vimba | Biga drainage, Bursa, Turkey | 40°12'18.0"N, 29°05'13.2"E | 1 | KJ554609 | H6 |
|
|||
31 | Vimba vimba | Koeprue drainage, Isparta, Turkey | 37°31'40.8"N, 31°16'08.4"E | 2 | KJ554606, KJ554754 | H6 |
|
|||
32 | Vimba vimba | Danube R., Slovakia | 48°04'04.2"N, 17°09'53.2"E (predict) | 1 | AY026404 | H1 |
|
|||
33 | Vimba melanops | Inece stream, Kırklareli, Turkey | 41°41'34.0"N, 27°04'59.0"E | 4 | OK493415, OK493416 | H27 H28 | 2 | OK444819 | H1 | This study |
34 | Vimba melanops | Evros, Aegean Sea basin, Greece | 40°50'42.0"N, 26°01'22.8"E | 1 | GQ279757 | H26 |
|
|||
35 | Vimba melanops | Biserska River, Greece | 40°55'08.5"N, 26°11'48.0"E (predict) | 1 | MG806725 | H25 | 1 | MG806910 | H1 | Schonhuth et al. 2018 |
36 | Vimba melanops | River Strymon, Greece | 41°43'53.5"N, 23°09'30.9"E (predict) | 2 | AF090778, HM560236 | H24 H21 | 1 | HM560382 | H4 | Zardoya & Doadrio, 1999 |
37 | Vimba melanops | Pinios, Aegean Sea basin, Greece | 39°39'57.6"N, 22°14'02.4"E | 2 | GQ279758, GQ279759 | H23 H22 |
|
|||
38 | Vimba melanops | Aliakmon R. Kaloneri, Greece | 40°17'26.5"N, 21°28'17.9"E (predict) | 1 | HM560235 | H21 |
|
|||
39 | Vimba melanops | Volvi lake, Greece | 40°39'36.0"N, 23°32'24.0"E | 1 | AY026403 | H29 | 3 | HQ600801- HQ600803 | H1 |
|
40 | Vimba melanops | Kerkini lake, Greece | 41°06'36.0"N, 23°03'00.0"E | 3 | HQ600804- HQ600806 | H1, H3, H4 |
|
|||
41 | Vimba melanops | Biserska R., Evros drainage, Bulgaria | 41°51'18.0"N, 25°55'22.8"E | 3 | KJ554935, KJ554568, KJ554722 | H1 |
|
|||
42 | Vimba melanops | Charmanlijskaja drainage, Bulgaria | 41°53'20.4"N, 25°41'13.2"E | 1 | KJ554876 | H2 |
|
|||
43 | Vimba melanops | Vardar drainage, Greece | 40°59'16.8"N, 22°33'28.8"E | 2 | KJ554926, KJ554576 | H5 |
|
|||
44 | Vimba mirabilis | Akçay stream, Büyük Menderes, Aydın, Turkey | 37°45'34.0"N, 28°20'07.0"E | 9 | OK493414, AY026410 | H20 H19 | 4 | OK444822, OK444823 | H8, H9 | This study, |
45 | Vimba mirabilis | Çine stream, Büyük Menderes, Aydın, Turkey | 37°45'43.8"N, 27°50'13.1"E | 4 | OK493414 | H20 | 1 | KJ554739 | H8 | This study, |
Clustal W (Thompson et al. 1994) algorithm was implemented in Bioedit v7.2.5 (Hall 1999) software to align cyt b and COI barcoding regions. Haplotype number (H), polymorphic and variable sites, haplotype diversity (Hd), and nucleotide diversity (π) were computed for each species by DnaSP version 6.12.03 (
We estimated divergence times using StarBEAST (
The nucleotide sequences of the cyt b gene region (1023 bp) were studied in 91 specimens from three species of Vimba (Additional Table
Based on ML and Bayesian phylogenetic inferences, four mitochondrial clades of Vimba species are observed. The first and second clades include distinct V. vimba populations, while the other clades comprise V. mirabilis and V. melanops. V. vimba is not monophyletic because the Western (Pontic) and Caspian basin haplotypes of V. vimba are located in two different clades. As shown in Fig.
Maximum likelihood tree based on the two concatenated mitochondrial genes (cyt b and COI) (1675 bp) sequences of Vimba species. Maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses resulted in congruent trees. Bootstrap and posterior probability values are shown above nodes on a tree if 50% or higher.
The present study investigates the phylogeny and phylogeography of three Vimba species to provide the first comprehensive molecular study on the genus. Although some work has been conducted on Vimba species, there are no comprehensive studies on their phylogeography, which is provided in the present study.
Here, the phylogeny constructed by ML and BI approaches is based on concatenated mtDNA cyt b and COI sequences of three Vimba species. The phylogenetic tree topology revealed that species were clustered into four well-supported clades (V. vimba (Western), V. vimba (Caspian), V. melanops, and V. mirabilis) with high-reliability BI Posterior probability value (BI = 0.98) although low ML bootstrap value (ML < 50). In V. vimba, two lineages are observed, the Caspian and the Western, monophyly of both group supported by high BI (0.98) value. V. melanops and V. mirabilis belong to different clades with high BP (97) and BI posterior probability (1.00) (Fig.
According to
Phylogeography of V. vimba was investigated by
In the Early Pleistocene, the depression of the Marmara Sea and the uplift of the Aegean mountains contributed greatly to the separation of V. vimba and V. mirabilis. Furthermore, while the water of the Büyük Menderes River was flowing in the north-south direction because of the western Anatolian Mountains barrier, fractures and foldings which occurred in the Early Pleistocene caused the river to turn west and take its present form. V. mirabilis is present in Bafa Lake because of alluvium brought in by the Menderes River that blocked the old sea gulf and separated it from the sea, creating Bafa Lake (
Por, (1989) specified that a line drawn from west to east in the middle of Turkey could be considered as a major suture, which leads to distinct species of Vimba between the Büyük Menderes and northern Aegean. The differences between the Balkan and Anatolian species can primarily be associated with the formation of the Aegean in the late Pliocene (
I am pleased to thank Davut Turan and Cüneyt Kaya for providing samples. Also, I extend my special thanks to the Editor, Nicolas Hubert and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that greatly improved the manuscript.