Research Article
Print
Research Article
Exploring the evolutionary potential of parasites: Larval stages of pathogen digenic trematodes in their thiarid snail host Tarebia granifera in Thailand
expand article infoNuanpan Veeravechsukij, Suluck Namchote, Marco T. Neiber§, Matthias Glaubrecht§, Duangduen Krailas
‡ Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
§ Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Open Access

Abstract

Minute intestinal flukes from several distinct families of endoparasitic platyhelminths are a medically important group of foodborne trematodes prevalent throughout Southeast Asia and Australasia. Their lifecycle is complex, with freshwater snails as primary intermediate hosts, with infecting multiple species of arthropods and fish as second intermediate hosts, and with birds and mammals including humans as definitive hosts. In Southeast Asian countries, the diversity of snail species of the Thiaridae which are frequently parasitized by trematode species is extremely high. Here, the thiarid Tarebia granifera in Thailand was studied for variation of trematode infections, by collecting the snails every two months for one year from each locality during the years 2004–2009, and during 2014–2016 when snails from the same localities were collected and new localities found. From ninety locations a total of 15,076 T. granifera were collected and examined for trematode infections. With 1,577 infected snails the infection rate was found to be 10.46 %. The cercariae were categorized into fifteen species from eight morphologically distinguishable types representing several distinct families, viz. (i) virgulate xiphidiocercariae (Loxogenoides bicolor, Loxogenes liberum and Acanthatrium histaense), (ii) armatae xiphidiocercariae cercariae (Maritreminoides caridinae and M. obstipus); (iii) parapleurophocercous cercariae (Haplorchis pumilio, H. taichui and Stictodora tridactyla); (iv) pleurophocercous cercariae (Centrocestus formosanus); (v) megarulous cercariae (Philophthalmus gralli); (vi) furcocercous cercariae (Cardicola alseae, Alaria mustelae and Transversotrema laruei); as well as (vii) echinostome-type cercariae, and (viii) gymnocephalous-type cercariae. In addition, a phylogenetic marker (internal transcribed spacers 2, ITS2) was employed in generic and infrageneric level classifications of these trematodes, using sequences obtained from shed cercariae isolated from T. granifera specimens of the second study period collected in various regions in Thailand. We obtained ITS2 sequences of cercariae from nine species (of seven types): Loxogenoides bicolor, Loxogenes liberum, Maritreminoides obstipus, Haplorchis taichui, Stictodora tridactyla, Centrocestus formosanus, Philophthalmus gralli, as well as from one species each of echinostome cercariae and gymnocephalous cercariae. Thus, this analysis combines the parasites’ data on morphology and geographical occurrence with molecular phylogeny, aiming to provide the groundwork for future studies looking into more details of the parasite-snail evolutionary relationships.

Key Words

Trematoda , Cerithioidea , Thiaridae , human health, cercariae, intermediate hosts

Introduction

Trematodes (or flatworms) are endoparasitic platyhelminths that not only infect fishes, birds and other wildlife worldwide but also mammals as well as humans. As foodborne parasites they are of medical importance resulting in significant morbidities and mortalities worldwide. For example, the disability adjusted life years (also known as DALYs) for the foodborne trematodiases including Fasciola spp., Clonorchis spp., Opisthorchis spp., Paragonimus spp. and the minute intestinal trematodes such as Fasciolopsis buski, Heterophyes spp. and Metagonimus spp., are estimated to be 2.02 million worldwide (Torgerson et al. 2015).

Especially as liver flukes and intestinal flukes human infecting parasites are highly prevalent in Southeast Asian countries (Wongratanacheewin et al. 2001, Chai et al. 2005, 2013, Krailas et al. 2014). Infections caused by these flukes have a major public health impact and are also of economic importance in veterinary medicine. Humans or domestic animals become infected when they eat raw, salted, pickled or smoked fish containing the infective metacercariae (e.g. Opisthorchis spp.,) or contaminated to raw or uncooked vegetables (e.g. Fasciola spp.) (see e.g. Krailas et al. 2011, Krailas et al. 2014). Examples include the liver fluke Opisthorchis viverrini, which can cause cholangiocarcinoma, a kind of cancer in the bile ducts. The intestinal fluke Haplorchis taichui is a possible agent of irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms, and Centrocestus formosanus may cause epigastric pain and indigestion accompanied by occasional diarrhea (Watthanakulpanich et al. 2010, Sripa et al. 2010, Chai et al. 2013). The prevalence of human trematode infections of the mentioned species was found to be the highest in the northern and northeastern regions of Thailand (Srisawangwong et al. 1997, Pungpak et al. 1998, Radomyos et al. 1998, Sukontason et al. 1999). In Northeast Thailand alone, for example, about six million people are infected with the liver fluke, O. viverrini (Shin et al. 2010). As Thailand has the highest incidence of cholangiocarcinoma associated with O. viverrini (Sripa et al. 2007), opisthorchiasis received greater attention for research than infection with the minute intestinal flukes, such as Haplorchis taichui, for which no such associations have been documented. Nevertheless, Thai people have considerably underestimated these trematodes in the past by continually eating traditional Thai food prepared from raw freshwater fish (Chuboon et al. 2005). Hence, the prevalence of trematodes in Thailand remains a continuous problem (Krailas et al. 2014).

Trematodes often have very complex life cycles involving at least one, sometimes two or four, but usually three different hosts, of which the first is almost always a mollusc (Galaktionov and Dobrovolskij 2003). Eggs are released by the definitive host and either the first larval stage, i.e. the miracidium, hatches from the egg in a suitable medium (usually water) being adapted for actively recognizing and penetrating the first intermediate host; or the miracidium remains embryonated within the egg and infects the first intermediate host through passive uptake and subsequent hatching and penetration within the host. The miracidium develops directly into a (mother) sporocyst that may produce daughter sporocysts or rediae (sometimes rediae also produce a second generation of rediae). Another larval form, i.e. the cercariae, then develops either within the sporocyst or within the redia in the first intermediate host and is typically released into the environment where it either actively searches and penetrates the host or is passively taken up. Within the second host cercariae encyst and develop into metacercariae. Through predation metacercariae are taken up by the definitive host and then develop into the adult trematode completing the life cycle. Deviations from this typical life cycle occur either in the number of different life cycle stages that actually develop or in the number of hosts involved in the development (for a detailed overview, see Galaktionov and Dobrovolskij 2003).

The occurrence of trematodes depends on the presence of first and second intermediate host species, as well as the eating habit of local people (Radomyos et al. 1998). In Thailand, medically-important freshwater snails have been investigated since 1980 for trematode infections (Upatham et al. 1980, Nithiuthai et al. 2002, Krailas et al. 2003, 2008, 2014, Sri-aroon et al. 2005, Dechruksa et al. 2007, 2013, 2017, Ukong et al. 2007). For example, the liver fluke Opisthorchis viverrini (Family: Opisthorchiidae) is found in Thailand in freshwater snails Bithynia funiculataa, B. siamensis goniomphalos and B. siamensis siamensis (Bithyniidae). However, despite the importance of the snail intermediate host(s) to the lifecycle of trematodes, the faunistic and biosystematic knowledge of these limnic molluscs is scarce in general. In particular, among the Cerithioidea which is ecologically and phylogenetically a highly important caenogastropod group of molluscs (Glaubrecht 1996, 2009, 2011; Strong et al. 2011), several freshwater gastropods are known especially in the Thiaridae Gill, 1871 to be important first intermediate hosts of trematodes. For example, species of the intestinal lung fluke Paragonimus have been identified in paludomids and/or thiarids, such as e.g. species of Paludomus as well as in Melanoides tuberculata and Tarebia granifera. Pinto and de Melo (2011) list 37 species of cercariae and another 81 trematode larval forms for Melanoides tuberculata Müller, 1774. For Thailand Brandt (1974) lists five snail species, viz. Melanoides tuberculata, M. jugicostis Hanley & Theobald, 1876, Sermyla riqueti Grateloup, 1840, Neoradina prasongi Brandt, 1974 and Tarebia granifera Lamarck, 1816 (see Lamarck 1816), that are currently assigned to the Thiaridae (Glaubrecht 1996, 1999, 2011, Lydeard et al. 2002, Glaubrecht et al. 2009, Strong et al. 2011). Most recently, Krailas et al. (2014) and Dechruksa et al. (2017) investigated the cercarial fauna of M. tuberculata and M. jugicostis populations from Thailand in detail, reporting 18 different cercariae from the former and four from the latter; among them C. formosanus, H. taichui, Haplorchis pumilio Looss, 1896 and Stictodora tridactyla Martin & Kuntz, 1955 that are known to be human pathogen (Watson 1960, Malek and Cheng 1974, Upatham et al. 1995, Pointier and Jourdane 2000, Dechruksa et al. 2007, Ukong et al. 2007).

In the present study, the cercarial fauna of Tarebia granifera populations from Thailand is investigated. This thiarid species is widespread in the Oriental region, with an autochthonous range including South and Southeast Asia, South China and numerous islands of the Western Pacific (Brandt 1974, Glaubrecht 1996). The species has been introduced to Africa, the Near East, North and Central America as well as to the Caribbean region and is considered to be invasive there (Abbott 1952, Chaniotis et al. 1980, Prentice 1983, Vargas et al. 1991, Fernández et al. 1992, Gutierrez et al. 1997, Pointier et al. 1998, Appleton 2002, Mukaratirwa et al. 2005, Facon and David 2006, Appleton et al. 2009, Miranda et al. 2010, 2011, Miranda and Perissinotto 2012). A parallel study on Tarebia granifera (also published in this journal; see Veeravechsukij et al. 2018) shows this species to be widely distributed throughout Thailand, with several named and described congeneric constituent populations, as is revealed by respective collections carried out in the North, Northeast, South, East, and Central region, and morphological documentation conducted detailing the biometrical parameters of the adult shells. In addition, molecular phylogenies using fragments of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) and 16 S rRNA genes have been constructed, as well as the reproductive strategy documented (i.e. the various stages of embryos and juveniles in the brood pouch) and analysed as to the effect of cercariae infection in female snails.

Here we apply, aside from traditional morphological methods, molecular genetic techniques in order to delimit species of cercariae; i.e. sequencing parts of the nuclear ribosomal RNA gene cluster that have been shown to be efficient for the identification of species of trematodes from their distinct life stages (Skov et al. 2009, Prasad et al. 2011, Davies et al. 2015, Anucherngchai et al. 2016, 2017). With this combination of molecular phylogeny and the parasites’ data on morphology and geographical occurrence, we attempt to provide the groundwork for future studies determining the parasite’s evolutionary potential within the complex snail-host relationship.

Materials and methods

Sampling

Specimens of Tarebia granifera were collected in streams, ponds, rivers, brooks, trenches and mountain creeks in all major regions of Thailand (North, South, East, Central and Northeast). Geographic coordinates (WGS84 datum) of sampling sites were determined with the global positioning system (GPS) (Garmin PLUS III, Taiwan). Where GPS data for sampling sites were unavailable, coordinates were determined as accurately as possible from a map. Sampling sites were mapped on a dot-by-dot basis on a public domain map (ArcGIS, Esri, Redlands, California, USA) and then compiled using Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, California, USA).

Collection methods and determination of snails

Snail collections were done during two periods. In the first period, from 2004 to 2009, the snails were collected every two months for one year from each of all the locations. During the second period, from 2014 to 2016, the same localities were visited again, but additional samples were also taken at several new localities, this time collected once only from each location. The snails were collected using the counts per unit of time sampling method (Olivier and Schneiderman 1956). Five researchers collected samples by handpicking and scooping every 10 minutes at each sampling site. The snails were transferred and studied in the laboratory of the Parasitology and Medical Malacology Research Unit, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand (PaMaSU: code SUT). The snails were identified according to their shell morphology , following essentially Brandt (1974), and subsequently examined for trematode infections.

Cercarial study

Collected snails were investigated for trematode infections by using shedding and crushing methods. Descriptions of their morphology were based on living cercariae that had escaped from the snails. The emerged cercariae were studied unstained or vitally stained with 0.5% neutral red. Details of the cercariae were drawn using a camera lucida and identified according to Schell (1970), Yamaguti (1975), Ito (1980) and Krailas et al. (2014). Sample measurements (average size) in micrometers were taken, using an ocular micrometer, from 10 specimens fixed in 10% formalin. Some cercariae (c. 20 specimens from each location) belonging to identified trematode species were then preserved in 95% ethanol for further DNA analysis.

Molecular study of cercariae

The preserved cercariae were processed for molecular identification at the Department of Animal Diversity, Zoological Museum of the Center for Natural History (CeNak), Universität Hamburg, Germany. Genomic DNA from the cercariae was extracted using the DNeasy blood and animal tissue kit (QIAGEN, Venlo, The Netherlands). Amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the nuclear internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region were performed with the following primers ITS2-F (5'-CTT GAACGC ACA TTG CGG CCA TGG G-3') and ITS2-R: (5'-GCG GGT AAT CACGTC TGA GCC GAG G-3') (Sato et al. 2009). Reactions were set up in 20 μl volumes containing 1.0 µl dNTPs (2 mM each), 2.0 µl 10× mM DreamTaq Green buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), 0.3 µl GreenTaq DNA polymerase (5 U/µl, Thermos Fisher Scientific), 1.0 µl of each primer (10 μM) and 14.7 µl ddH2O. The DNA samples were initially denatured at 94 °C for 4 min followed by 35 cycles (denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 2 min; see Sato et al. 2009) and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR products were purified according to the protocol for enzymatic PCR product clean-up with exonuclease I (20 U/µl, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and FastAP thermosensitive alkaline phosphatase (1 U/µL, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Purified PCR products were sequenced at Macrogen Europe Lab. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Alignments of forward and reverse strands were conducted using Geneious 10.1.3 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand). The ITS2 consensus sequences were aligned in MEGA 7 (Kumar et al. 2016) using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004) under default settings. A Neighbor joining (NJ) analysis was performed based on p-distances with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. For details on sequences used for this study, see Table 1.

Table 1.

List of ITS2 sequences used for the phylogenetic analysis. For SUT numbers, see the material lists in the main part of the text.

Species of cercariae Type of cercariae Locality GenBank accession number Reference
Angiostrongylus cantonensis HQ540551 C. Y. Liu (unpubl.)
Lecithodendrium spathulatum Xiphidiocercariae JF784192 Lord et al. (2012)
Lecithodendrium linstowi Xiphidiocercariae KJ934792 Kudlai et al. (2015)
Loxogenoides bicolor Xiphidiocercariae SUT 0515066 B MH991970 This study
SUT 0515067 B MH991981 This study
SUT 0515077 B MH991985 This study
SUT 0515079 C MH991978 This study
SUT 0515087 B MH991983 This study
SUT 0515090 B MH991976 This study
SUT 0516106 A MH991982 This study
SUT 0516109 B MH991977 This study
SUT 0516118 B MH991984 This study
SUT 0516121 A MH991974 This study
SUT 0516125 A MH991980 This study
SUT 0516128 B MH991972 This study
SUT 0516129 B MH991979 This study
SUT 0516130 B MH991971 This study
SUT 0516139 B MH991973 This study
SUT 0516145 B MH991975 This study
Loxogenes liberum Xiphidiocercariae SUT 0516109 B MH991986 This study
SUT 0516143 B MH991987 This study
Maritreminoides obstipus Xiphidiocercariae SUT 0516124 A MH991988 This study
SUT 0516138 B MH991989 This study
Haplorchis pumilio Parapleurophocercous cercariae KP165437 Mei et al. (2015)
KX815125 Le et al. (2017)
Haplorchis taichui Parapleurophocercous cercariae SUT 0515090 B MH991968 This study
SUT 0516125 A MH991969 This study
KX815126 Le et al. (2017)
Stictodora tridactyla Parapleurophocercous cercariae SUT 0515058 A MH991962 This study
SUT 0515059 B MH991960 This study
SUT 0515071 A MH991958 This study
SUT 0515072 B MH991953 This study
SUT 0515074 B MH991959 This study
SUT 0515075 B MH991954 This study
SUT 0515078 B MH991963 This study
SUT 0515086 A MH991957 This study
SUT 0516138 B MH991961 This study
SUT 0516139 B MH991956 This study
SUT 0516142 B MH991955 This study
Centrocestus formosanus Pleurophocercous cercariae SUT 0516102 B MH991964 This study
SUT 0516109 B MH991966 This study
SUT 0516125 A MH991967 This study
SUT 0516142 B MH991965 This study
Centrocestus sp. Pleurophocercous cercariae JQ390547 M. Karamian, S. M. Sadjjadi and B. Farhangmehr (unpubl.)
Centrocestus sp. Pleurophocercous cercariae AY245699 Dzikowski et al. (2004)
Opisthorchis viverrini Pleurophocercous cercariae AY584735 Parvathi et al. 2008
Opisthorchis felineus Pleurophocercous cercariae EF688141 Katokhin et al. (2008)
Philophthalmus gralli Megarulous cercariae SUT 0515058 A MH991965 This study
KF986200 Heneberg et al. (2014)
Echinostome cercariae Echinostome cercariae SUT 0515086 A MH991991 This study
Gymnocephalous cercariae Gymnocephalous cercariae SUT 0515059 B MH991990 This study
Fasciola hepatica Gymnocephalous cercariae AM900370 Ali et al. (2008)
Fasciola gigantica Gymnocephalous cercariae AJ853848 M. D. Bargues and S. Mas-Coma (unpubl.)
AM850108 Ali et al. (2008)

Results

Geographical origin of collected snails

Specimens of Tarebia granifera were found at 90 sampling sites in five regions of Thailand (Fig. 1). During the first sampling period (2004–2009), infected snails were reported from 18 sampling sites. In the second period (2014–2016), infected snails were reported from 51 sampling sites. At a total of 58 localities in four regions of Thailand snails with cercarial infections were found. For information on sampling sites including geographic coordinates and the number of infected snails, see Table 2.

Figure 1. 

Shells of Tarebia granifera (Lamarck, 1816) from representative populations in Thailand. a. Ban Thung Hang stream, Lampang Province (SUT 0514044); b. Huai Sa Dao Pong, Phetchabun Province (SUT 0516123); c. Kaeng Bang Ra Chan, Phetchabun Province (SUT 0515088); d. Pla Ba waterfall, Loei Province (SUT 0515068); e. Ban Nong Phai, Kanchanaburi Province (SUT 0515059); f. Khlong Sathing Mo, Songkhla Province (SUT 0516144); g. Huay Nam Kong, Mae Hong Son Province (SUT 0515081); h. Huay MaeYuak, Lampang Province (SUT 0514046); i. Sam Sip Khot waterfall, Phetchabun Province (SUT 0516129); j. Sai Yok Yai waterfall, Kanchanaburi Province (SUT 0515092); k. Khlong Palian, Trang Province (SUT 0515095); l. Khlong Cham Rai reservoir, Songkhla Province (SUT 0516143). For more details on locality data, see Table 2. Scale bar: 10 mm.

Table 2.

Localities, number of collected snails, number of infected snails and trematodes obtained from collected snails; sampling periods: 2004–2009 and 2014–2016.

No. Voucher Number Location GPS 2004–2009 2014–2016
No. of collected snails No. of infected snails Infection rates (%) No. of collected snails No. of infected snails Infection rates (%)
The North
N1 SUT 0515083 Huai Pa Hung (Pai drainage, Salween river system), Pang Mapha District, Mae Hong Son Province 19°22'19.6"N, 098°26'35.9"E, Altitude 437 m * * * 179 1: L. bicolor (1) 0.56
N2 SUT 0515081 Huay Nam Kong (Salween river system), Muang District, Mae Hong Son Province 19°28'33.6"N, 098°07'02.4"E, Altitude 425 m * * * 24 0 0
N3 SUT 0515077 Tham Pla (Pai drainage, Salween river system), Muang District, Mae Hong Son Province 19°25'31.1"N, 097°59'27.2"E, Altitude 300 m 185 144: L. bicolor (34), A. hitaense (25), H. pumilio (68), C. formosanus (7), C. alseae (5), T. laruei (5) 77.84 179 8: L. bicolor (3), H. pumilio (5) 4.47
N4 SUT 0515078 Pai river (Pai drainage, Salween river system), Muang District, Mae Hong Son Province 19°21'54.8"N, 097°58'10.7"E, Altitude 217 m * * * 64 1: S. tridactyla (1) 1.56
N5 SUT 0515079 Huay Sua Tao (Pai drainage, Salween river system), Muang District, Mae Hong Son Province 19°15'31.6"N, 097°54'44.6"E, Altitude 237 m 574 98: L. bicolor (52), A. hitaense (38), H. pumilio (5), T. laruei (3) 17.07 153 2: L. bicolor (2), 1.31
N6 SUT 0514052 Ban Mai Saraphi (Ping drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Chom Thong District, Chiang Mai Province 18°16'26.1"N, 098°38'54.0"E, Altitude 277 m * * * 162 11: L. bicolor (6), S. tridactyla (5) 6.79
N7 SUT 0514051 Ban Mae Suai Luang (Ping drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Chom Thong District, Chiang Mai Province 18°17'04.4"N, 098°39'15.0"E, Altitude 268 m * * * 23 2: S. tridactyla (2) 8.70
N8 SUT 0514054 Mae Soy bridge (Ping drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Chom Thong District, Chiang Mai Province 18°17'23.0"N, 098°39'3.6"E, Altitude 271 m * * * 70 5: L. bicolor (5) 7.14
N9 SUT 0514050 Ban Huay Phang (Ping drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Chom Thong District, Chiang Mai Province, 18°17'08.5"N, 098°39'16.9"E, Altitude 263 m * * * 103 0 0
N10 SUT 0516119 Thansawan waterfall (Yom drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Chiang Muan District, Phayao Province 18°51'22.2"N, 100°11'09.1"E, Altitude 415 m 219 2: A. hitaense (1), A. mustelae (1) 0.91 17 1: S. tridactyla (1) 5.88
N11 SUT 0516117 Yom river (Yom drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Chiang Muan District, Phayao Province 18°54'39.7"N, 100°16'27.7"E, Altitude 266 m * * * 30 0 0
N12 SUT 0516108 Mae Nam Saai kg 9 +457 bridge (Yom drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Muang District, Phrae Province 18°05'03.1"N, 100°13'00.1"E, Altitude 171 m * * * 143 0 0
N13 SUT 0516113 Mae Marn reservoir (Yom drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Sung Men District, Phrae Province 18°00'50.6"N, 100°08'22.6"E, Altitude 205 m * * * 52 0 0
N14 SUT 0514045 Wang river (Wang drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Chae Hom District, Lampang Province 18°56'00.5"N, 099°38'54.6"E, Altitude 376 m * * * 49 12: S. tridactyla (12) 24.49
N15 SUT 0514044 Ban Thung Hang stream (Wang drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Chae Hom District, Lampang Province 18°52'47.5"N, 099°40'01.0"E, Altitude 373 m * * * 165 11: S. tridactyla (11) 6.67
N16 SUT 0514046 Huay MaeYuak (Wang drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Chae Hom District, Lampang Province 18°46'39.8"N, 099°38'38.7"E, Altitude 352 m * * * 44 1: L. bicolor (1) 2.27
N17 SUT 0516124 km. 40+075 bridge (Wang drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Chae Hom District, Lampang Province 18°42'14.8"N, 099°35'31.7"E, Altitude 330 m * * * 59 4: L. liberum (3), M. obstipus (1) 6.78
N18 SUT 0515090 Wa river (Nan drainage, Chao, Phraya river system), Bo Kluea District, Nan Province 19°11'30.4"N, 101°12'13.2"E, Altitude 713 m * * * 159 16: L. bicolor (6), H. taichui (10) 10.06
N19 SUT 0516114 Huay Si Pun reservoir (Nan drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Ban Luang District, Nan Province 18°51'45.1"N, 100°28'37.1"E, Altitude 430 m * * * 108 0 0
N20 SUT 0516109 Mae pool waterfall (Nan drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Laplae District, Uttaradit Province 17°43'42.3"N, 099°58'49.6"E, Altitude 123 m 137 43: L. bicolor (29), A. hitaense (5), H. pumilio (6), C. formosanus (3) 31.39 91 10: L. bicolor (4), L. liberum (4), C. formosanus (2) 10.99
N21 SUT 0516112 Kaeng Sai Ngam (Nan drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Tha Pla District, Uttaradit Province 17°52'19.5"N, 100°18'02.1"E, Altitude 257 m * * * 32 0 0
N22 SUT 0513019 Kaeng Wangwua (Nan drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Tha Pla District, Uttaradit Province 17°52'29.5"N, 100°18'25.6"E, Altitude 231 m * * * 292 4: S. tridactyla (4) 1.37
N23 SUT 0513023 Huai Nam Re Noi (Nan drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Tha Pla District, Uttaradit Province 17°52'51.3"N, 100°16'14.9"E, Altitude 269 m * * * 155 0 0
N24 SUT 0516103 Tat Duen waterfall (Yom drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Si Satchanalai District, Sukhothai Province 17°33'16.2"N, 099°29'48.2"E, Altitude 135 m 300 141: L. bicolor (71), A. hitaense (36), H. pumilio (8), C. formosanus (19), A. mustelae (7) 47 137 0 0
N25 SUT 0516102 Si Satchanalai national park (Yom drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Si Satchanalai District, Sukhothai Province 17°33'07.7"N, 099°29'28.8"E, Altitude 147 m 749 262: L. bicolor (85), A. hitaense (35), H. pumilio (11), C. formosanus (116), A. mustelae (15) 34.98 147 1: C. formosanus (1) 0.68
N26 SUT 0515075 Cheek point near moei river (Moei drainage, Salween river system), Tha Song Yang District, Tak Province 17°13'23.4"N, 098°13'34.2"E, Altitude 130 m * * * 55 9: S. tridactyla (9) 16.36
N27 SUT 0515076 Mae Salit Luang harbour (Moei drainage, Salween river system), Tha Song Yang District, Tak Province 17°26'04.8"N, 098°03'33.3"E, Altitude 109 m * * * 25 0 0
N28 SUT 0515073 Ban Wang Takhian (Moei drainage, Salween river system), Mae Sot District, Tak Province 16°42'38.5"N, 098°30'22.2"E, Altitude 196 m * * * 17 0 0
N29 SUT 0515072 Thong Dee harbour (Moei drainage, Salween river system), Mae Sot District, Tak Province 16°41'39.3"N, 098°31'04.4"E, Altitude 206 m * * * 304 21: L. bicolor (3), S. tridactyla (18) 6.91
N30 SUT 0515074 Ban Huay Muang (Moei drainage, Salween river system), Mae Sot District, Tak Province 16°40'58.4"N, 098°31'06.9"E, Altitude 199 m * * * 300 21: L. bicolor (1), S. tridactyla (20) 7.00
N31 SUT 0516126 Ban Pak Huay Mae Tho (Ping drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Muang District, Tak Province 16°52'29.3"N, 099°07'13.6"E, Altitude 106 m * * * 150 3: L. bicolor (1), L. liberum (2) 2.00
N32 SUT 0516121 Kaeng Wang Nam Yen (Khek drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Khao Kho District, Phetchabun Province 16°37'23.8"N, 100°54'0.5"E Altitude 710 m * * * 9 8: L. bicolor (8) 88.89
N33 SUT 0516120 Rajapruek resort (Khek drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Khao Kho District, Phetchabun Province 16°36'01.3"N, 100°54'29.9"E, Altitude 707 m * * * 52 28: L. bicolor (28) 53.85
N34 SUT 0516123 Huai Sa Dao Pong (Khek drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Khao Kho District, Phetchabun Province 16°34'24.1"N, 100°59'23.6"E, Altitude 322 m * * * 31 0 0
N35 SUT 0515088 Kaeng Bang Ra Chan (Khek drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Khao Kho District, Phetchabun Province 16°32'51.7"N, 100°54'03.2"E, Altitude 599 m * * * 71 6: L. bicolor (6) 8.45
N36 SUT 0516129 Sam Sip Khot waterfall (Pa Sak drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Khao Kho District, Phetchabun Province 16°32'25.6"N, 101°04'58.4"E, Altitude 386 m * * * 47 18: L. bicolor (18) 38.30
N37 SUT 0514041 Ban Wang Ta Pak Moo 13 (Pa Sak drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Wichian Buri District, Phetchabun Province 15°47'54.2"N, 101°14'8.1"E, Altitude 120 m * * * 312 0 0
N38 SUT 0514042 Huai Leng (Pa Sak drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Wichian Buri District, Phetchabun Province 15°47'52.2"N, 101°13'54.4"E, Altitude 117 m * * * 84 0 0
N39 SUT 0514040 Ban Wang Tian (Pa Sak drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Wichian Buri District, Phetchabun Province 15°47'29.7"N, 101°13'30.7"E, Altitude 121 m * * * 212 0 0
N40 SUT 0514043 Huay Range reservoir, Ban Wang Ta Pak (Pa Sak drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Wichian Buri District, Phetchabun Province 15°47'19.3"N, 101°15'07.4"E, Altitude 138 m * * * 128 0 0
N41 SUT 0516130 Than Thip waterfall (Pa Sak drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Lom Sak District, Phetchabun Province 16°39'46.3"N, 101°08'09.8"E, Altitude 374 m * * * 41 16: L. bicolor (16) 39.02
N42 SUT 0515087 Ban Kaeng Lat (Khek drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Nakhon Thai District, Phitsanulok Province 16°57'21.3"N, 100°55'31.0"E, Altitude 324 m * * * 14 5: L. bicolor (5) 35.71
N43 SUT 0516118 Kaeng Sopha (Khek drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Wang Thong District, Phitsanulok Province 16°52'13.1"N, 100°50'17.4"E, Altitude 413 m 282 72: L. bicolor (33), A. hitaense (24), C. formosanus (15) 25.53 30 2: L. bicolor (2) 6.67
N44 SUT 0515067 Poi waterfall (Khek drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Wang Thong District, Phitsanulok Province 16°50'36.3"N, 100°45'16.1"E, Altitude 208 m * * * 83 9: L. bicolor (6), M. caridinae (1), H. pumilio (2) 10.84
N45 SUT 0516105 Phunamkej Resort (Khek drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Wang Thong District, Phitsanulok Province 16°51'02.2"N, 100°36'41.1"E, Altitude 208 m * * * 73 0 0
N46 SUT 0516111 Kaeng Nangkoi (Khek drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Wang Thong District, Phitsanulok Province 16°53'09.0"N, 100°38'47.8"E, Altitude 180 m * * * 15 0 0
N47 SUT 0516106 Kaeng Hom (Khek drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Nakhon Thai District, Phitsanulok Province 16°52'20.8"N, 100°50'46.8"E, Altitude 185 m * * * 95 0 0
N48 SUT 0515086 Huai Nam Sai (Khek drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Nakhon Thai District, Phitsanulok Province 17°01'07.6"N, 100°55'36.0"E, Altitude 217 m * * * 93 38: S. tridactyla (28), Echinostome (10) 40.86
The Northeast
NE1 SUT 0516128 Tat Kok Tup waterfall (Loei drainage, Mekong river system), Phu Luang District, Loei Province 17°03'03.9"N, 101°31'38.7"E, Altitude 688 m * * * 45 12: L. bicolor (10), H. taichui (1), C. formosanus (1) 26.67
NE2 SUT 0515068 Pla Ba waterfall (Mekong river system), Phu Ruea District, Loei Province 17°23'24.7"N, 101°22'27.3"E, Altitude 664 m 53 1: A. hitaense (1) 1.89 178 3: L. bicolor (3) 1.69
NE3 SUT 0516125 km. 50+350 Loei river (Loei drainage, Mekong river system), Phu Luang District, Loei Province 17°04'38.0"N, 101°29'20.6"E, Altitude 675 m * * * 55 13: L. bicolor (9), H. taichui (3), C. formosanus (1) 23.64
NE4 SUT 0515064 Bueng Thung Sang (Chi drainage, Mekong river system), Muang District, Khon Kaen Province 16°34'45.6"N, 102°50'22.5"E, Altitude 160 m * * * 20 0 0
NE5 SUT 0516131 Lamphraphloeng reservoir (Mun drainage, Mekong river system), Pak Thong Chai District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province 14°35'32.3"N, 101°50'30.1"E, Altitude 259 m * * * 36 0 0
The East
E1 SUT 0516135 Mae Rumphueng Beach (Mae Rumphueng canal, Gulf of Thailand), Muang Rayong District, Rayong Province 12°37'50.0"N, 101°20'35"E, Altitude 8 m * * * 150 0 0
The Central
C1 SUT 0516127 Bung Boraphet (Chao Phraya river system), Muang District, Nakhon Sawan Province 15°40'59.6"N, 100°14'59.3"E Altitude 32 m * * * 42 1: L. liberum (1) 2.38
C2 SUT 0516133 Dong Phaya Yen waterfall (Pa Sak drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Muak Lek District, Sara Buri Province 14°44'06.4"N, 101°11'31.4"E, Altitude 156 m 371 1: L. bicolor (1) 0.27 27 1: L. bicolor (1) 3.70
C3 SUT 0516132 Suanmaduea waterfall (Pa Sak drainage, Chao Phraya river system), Phatthana Nikhom District, Lop Buri Province 14°55'12.3"N, 101°13'10.9"E, Altitude 136 m 358 5: L. bicolor (5) 1.40 48 0 0
C4 SUT 0515055 Pond of Silpakorn University (Tha Chin river system), Muang District, Nakhon Pathom Province 13°49'01.2"N, 100°02'27.9"E, Altitude 79 m 381 2: L. bicolor (2) 0.52 30 0 0
C5 SUT 0515091 Hin dad hot spring (Khwae Noi drainage, Mae Klong river system), Thong Pha Phum District, Kanchanaburi Province 14°37'25.9"N, 098°43'40.5"E, Altitude 159 m 39 5: L. bicolor (1), H. pumilio (3), S. tridactyla (1) 12.82 2 0 0
C6 SUT 0515092 Sai Yok Yai waterfall (Khwae drainage, Mae Klong river system), Sai Yok District, Kanchanaburi Province 14°26'03.0"N, 098°51'14.7"E, Altitude 104 m * * * 49 0 0
C7 SUT 0515093 Sai Yok Noi waterfall (Khwae drainage, Mae Klong river system), Sai Yok District, Kanchanaburi Province 14°14'27.6"N, 099°03'55.9"E, Altitude 116 m * * * 29 0 0
C8 SUT 0515061 Ban Thung Makham Tia (Phachi drainage, Mae Klong river system), Dan Makham Tia District, Kanchanaburi Province 13°54'18.1"N, 099°23'07.8"E, Altitude 45 m * * * 42 1: S. tridactyla (1) 2.38
C9 SUT 0515060 Ban Ta Pu (Phachi drainage, Mae Klong river system), Dan Makham Tia District, Kanchanaburi Province 13°51'17.7"N, 099°22'58.9"E, Altitude 56 m * * * 99 0 0
C10 SUT 0515059 Ban Nong Phai (Phachi drainage, Mae Klong river system), Dan Makham Tia District, Kanchanaburi Province 13°46'44.8"N, 099°25'26.7"E, Altitude 72 m * * * 118 5: S. tridactyla (3), P. gralli (1), Gymnocephalous (1) 4.24
The South
S1 SUT 0515066 Ban Purakom (Phachi drainage, Mae Klong river system), Suan Phueng District, Ratchaburi Province 13°19'29.2"N, 099°14'22.0"E, Altitude 277 m * * * 280 30: L. bicolor (29), S. tridactyla (1) 10.71
S2 SUT 0515069 Huay Nueng (Phachi drainage, Mae Klong river system), Suan Phueng District, Ratchaburi Province 13°32'52.2"N, 099°17'33.7"E, Altitude 156 m 832 94: L. bicolor (30), S. tridactyla (64) 11.30 272 23: L. liberum (2), S. tridactyla (21) 8.46
S3 SUT 0515070 Lum Nam Phachi (Phachi drainage, Mae Klong river system), Suan Phueng District, Ratchaburi Province 13°32'54.2"N, 099°21'42.3"E, Altitude 110 m * * * 242 5: S. tridactyla (5) 2.07
S4 SUT 0515057 Ban Dan Thap Tako (Phachi drainage, Mae Klong river system), Chom Bueng District, Ratchaburi Province 13°41'28.1"N, 099°29'08.1"E, Altitude 82 m * * * 240 11: L. bicolor (3), L. liberum (8) 4.58
S5 SUT 0515058 Phachi river Bridge (Phachi drainage, Mae Klong river system), Chom Bueng District, Ratchaburi Province 13°45'00.5"N, 099°26'27.4"E, Altitude 65 m * * * 292 16: L. bicolor (1), M. caridinae (10), S. tridactyla (4), P. gralli (1) 5.48
S6 SUT 0515056 Ban Pa Wai (Phachi drainage, Mae Klong river system), Chom Bueng District, Ratchaburi Province 13°37'0.15"N, 099°24'36.9"E, Altitude 74 m * * * 111 11: L. bicolor (3), M. caridinae (4), S. tridactyla (3), P. gralli (1) 9.91
S7 SUT 0515071 Huai Ban Bor (Phachi drainage, Mae Klong river system), Suan Phueng District, Ratchaburi Province 13°32'07.4"N, 099°20'31.8"E, Altitude 137 m * * * 196 21: M. obstipus (1), S. tridactyla (20) 10.71
S8 SUT 0513032 Khlong Cha-am (Cha-am canal, Gulf of Thailand), Cha-am District, Phetchaburi Province 12°48'02.7"N, 099°58'53.2"E, Altitude 22 m * * * 72 0 0
S9 SUT 0516146 Khlong Bueng reservoir (Bueng canal, Gulf of Thailand), Muang District, Prachuap Khiri Khan Province 11°55'29.1"N, 099°42'40.9"E, Altitude 72 m * * * 92 0 0
S10 SUT 0514037 Khlong Huai Yang (Yang canal), Thap Sakae District, Prachuap Khiri Khan Province 11°36'50.0"N, 099°40'07.9"E, Altitude 53 m 961 1: L. bicolor (1) 0.10 22 0 0
S11 SUT 0514038 Kar on waterfall (Nongyaplong canal), Bang Saphan District, Prachuap Khiri Khan Province 11°26'14.4"N, 099°26'33.0"E, Altitude 53 m 685 5: L. bicolor (5) 0.73 39 0 0
S12 SUT 0516149 Krapo waterfall (Tha Sae canal), Tha Sae District, Chumphon Province 10°44'28.8"N, 099°12'54.9"E, Altitude 74 m 223 181: L. bicolor (32), S. tridactyla (149) 81.17 30 0 0
S13 SUT 0516137 Khlong Klai (Nong Noi canal, Ta Pi river system), Ban Na San District, Surat Thani Province 08°48'06.9"N, 099°26'45.1"E, Altitude 108 m * * * 104 4: L. bicolor (4) 3.85
S14 SUT 0514048 Dat Fa waterfall (Lumpool canal, Ta Pi river system), Ban Na San District, Surat Thani Province 08°52'18.8"N, 099°25'59.1"E, Altitude 79 m * * * 144 2: L. bicolor (1), S. tridactyla (1) 1.39
S15 SUT 0516142 Vibhavadi waterfall (Tha Thong canal), Don Sak District, Surat Thani Province 09°08'07.2"N, 099°40'31.6"E, Altitude 26 m * * * 107 24: S. tridactyla (17), C. formosanus (7) 22.43
S16 SUT 0516147 Khlong Tha Sai (Takhoei canal, Gulf of Thailand), Tha Chang District, Surat Thani Province 09°12'39.8"N, 099°11'55.7"E, Altitude 8 m * * * 20 0 0
S17 SUT 0516148 Ban Tung Ao (Ta Khoei canal, Gulf of Thailand), Phunphin District, Surat Thani Province 09°12'25.7"N, 099°12'25.7"E, Altitude 7 m * * * 35 0 0
S18 SUT 0516145 Krung Ching waterfall (Klai canal), Nopphitam District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province 08°43'17.3"N, 099°40'14.8"E, Altitude 195 m 157 12: L. bicolor (5), A. hitaense (2), S. tridactyla (5) 7.64 22 4: L. bicolor (4) 18.18
S19 SUT 0516139 Khlong Prong (Klai canal), Nopphitam District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province 08°47'23.0"N, 099°38'13.2"E, Altitude 98 m * * * 50 11: L. bicolor (1), S. tridactyla (10) 22.00
S20 SUT 0515097 Khlong Sai (Khlong Sai canal, Andaman sea), Muang District, Krabi Province 08°10'20.8"N, 098°47'37.6"E, Altitude 23 m * * * 5 0 0
S21 SUT 0515098 Wang Than Thip (Wang Than Thip canal, Andaman sea), Muang District, Krabi Province 08°09'49.2"N, 098°47'50.9"E, Altitude 21 m * * * 42 0 0
S22 SUT 0515095 Khlong Palian (Palian canal), Yan Ta Khao District, Trang Province 07°22'11.0"N, 099°40'47.9"E, Altitude 19 m 77 15: L. bicolor (2), S. tridactyla (11), C. alseae (2) 19.48 1">15 4: S. tridactyla (4) 26.67
S23 SUT 0516138 Khlong Tha Leung (Tha Nae canal), Si Banphot District, Phatthalung Province 07°42'48.3"N, 099°51'33.6"E, Altitude 70 m * * * 36 14: M. obstipus (5), S. tridactyla (9) 38.89
S24 SUT 0516141 Khlong La reservoir (Utaphao canal, Gulf of Thailand), Khlong Hoi Khong District, Songkhla Province 06°52'29.3"N, 100°19'48.4"E, Altitude 60 m * * * 35 0 0
S25 SUT 0516144 Khlong Sathing Mo (Songkhla lake, Gulf of Thailand), Singhanakhon District, Songkhla Province 07°13'36.6"N, 100°31'41.8"E, Altitude 10 m * * * 3 0 0
S26 SUT 0516143 Khlong Cham Rai reservoir (Utaphao canal), Khlong Hoi Khong District, Songkhla Province 06°49'29.5"N, 100°19'49.7"E, Altitude 56 m * * * 139 3: L. liberum (3) 2.16
Total 6,583 1,084 16.47 8,493 493 5.80

Occurrence of trematodes obtained from Tarebia granifera in Thailand

The various trematode cercariae (distinguished and described in more detail below) exhibit a certain geographical pattern within the various water bodies in Thailand. Only two among the fifteen trematode species found in the thiarid T. granifera, viz. Loxogenoides bicolor and Stictodora tridactyla, were recorded in the present study from almost all major river systems in Thailand (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. 

Distribution of Tarebia granifera and trematodes in different river systems in Thailand. a. Distribution map. b. Comparative table of the occurrence of trematode cercariae in different river systems in Thailand. Black dots with attached pie charts in the map represent sampling sites where trematode infected specimens of T. granifera were found; white dots represent sampling sites where no infections were observed. Colors in the pie charts and the comparative table refer to trematode species/types (see legend inset).

In contrast, several species exhibit a more restricted distribution. For example, Haplorchis taichui was only detected in T. granifera samples from the Nan River (Chao Phraya river system) and the Loei River (Mekong river system), whereas Philophthalmus gralli and gymnocephalous cercaria were only detected in the Phachi River (Mae Klong river system). Echinostome cercaria were only present in the T. granifera population from the Khek River (Chao Phraya river system).

Cercariae of Loxogenes liberum, Centrocestus formosanus and Maritreminoides obstipus had again a somewhat wider distribution in Thai T. granifera populations, being present in several rivers of the Chao Phraya, Mae Klong and Gulf of Thailand drainages (Fig. 2).

Cercarial diversity and infection rates

A total of 15,076 snails of T. granifera were collected and examined for trematode infections. With 1,577 parasitized snails the overall infection rate was found to be 10.46 %. The obtained cercariae were classified into a total of fifteen species from eight morphologically distinguishable types representing at least seven distinct trematode families, viz. (i) virgulate xiphidiocercariae (Loxogenoides bicolor, Loxogenes liberum and Acanthatrium histaense), (ii) armatae xiphidiocercariae (Maritreminoides caridinae and Maritreminoides obstipus), (iii) parapleurophocercous cercariae (Haplorchis pumilio, Haplorchis taichui and Stictodora tridactyla), (iv) pleurophocercous cercariae (Centrocestus formosanus), (v) megarulous cercariae (Philophthalmus gralli), (vi) furcocercous cercariae (Cardicola alseae, Alaria mustelae and Transversotrema laruei), as well as (vii) echinostome cercariae, and (viii) gymnocephalous cercariae. The virgulate xiphidiocercariae were the dominant cercarial type infecting snails (5.10%), while infections with other cercarial types were found at rates of (ii) 0.15%, (iii) 3.73%, (iv) 1.14%, (v) 0.02%, (vi) 0.25%, (vii) 0.07%, (viii) 0.01%, respectively; see Table 3 for details.

In this study, neither double trematode infections nor triple trematode infections of collected Tarebia granifera were found.

Table 3.

Distribution of trematodes obtained from Tarebia granifera (A total of 15,076 snails) in Thailand (N = North, NE = Northeast, E = East, C = Central, S = South).

Type and species of trematodes 2004–2009 2014–2016 Total Infection rate (%)
(infected snail / no. of the total collected snails = 15,076)
No. infected snails No. infected snails
N NE E C S N NE E C S
Type 1. Virgulate xiphidiocercariae cercariae
1. Loxogenoides bicolor 304 0 0 9 75 122 22 0 1 46 579 3.84
2. Loxogenes liberum 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 13 23 0.15
3. Acanthatrium histaense 164 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 167 1.11
Total 468 1 0 9 77 131 22 0 2 59 769 5.10
Type 2. Armatae xiphidiocercariae cercariae
1. Maritreminoides caridinae 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 14 15 0.10
2. Maritreminoides obstipus 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 7 0.05
Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 20 22 0.15
Type 3. Parapleurophocercous cercariae
1. Haplorchis pumilio 98 0 0 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 108 0.72
2. Haplorchis taichui 0 0 0 0 0 10 4 0 0 0 14 0.09
3. Stictodora tridactyla 0 0 0 1 229 111 0 0 4 95 440 2.92
Total 98 0 0 4 229 128 4 0 4 95 562 3.73
Type 4. Pleurophocercous cercariae
1. Centrocestus formosanus 160 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 7 172 1.14
Total 160 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 7 172 1.14
Type 5. Megarulous cercariae
1. Philophthalmus gralli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0.02
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0.02
Type 6. Furcocercous cercariae
1. Cardicola alseae 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 0.05
2. Alaria mustelae 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0.15
3. Transversotrema laruei 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0.05
Total 36 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 38 0.25
Type 7. Echinostome cercariae
1. Echinostome cercariae 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 10 0.07
Total 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 10 0.07
Type 8. Gymnocephalous cercariae
1. Gymnocephalous cercariae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.01
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.01

Morphology of infecting cercariae

The cercariae were categorized by their morphology and organ characters, using as reference previous morphological descriptions (e.g. Schell 1970, Yamaguti 1975, Frandsen and Christensen 1984, Krailas et al. 2014). They are described as follows for the eight distinct morphological cercarial types known and found to date, attributable to at least seven distinct trematode families.

Type 1. Virgulate xiphidiocercariae cercariae

Lecithodendriidae Lühe, 1901 (sensu Odhner 1910)

1.1 Loxogenoides bicolor (Krull, 1933) (sensu Kaw 1945)

(Fig. 3)

Body oval; throughout with granules. Oral sucker bigger than ventral sucker; globular in shape and with stylet. Virgulate organ in the anterior part of the body. Pharynx small; an esophagus was not observed. Three pairs of penetration glands present located at about two thirds of the body, two anterior pairs with fine granules and a posterior pair with rather coarse, dark granules. Genital primordial C-shaped; excretory bladder U-shaped. Tail shorter than body; spinose at its tip.

The cercariae develop within sporocysts.

The infection rate was 3.84% (579/15,076) (Table 3).

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 53–88 μm (mean: 72 μm) × 105–138 μm (mean: 117 μm)

Stylet 5–8 μm (mean: 6 μm) × 20–40 μm (mean: 30 μm)

Oral sucker 23–40 μm (mean: 33 μm) × 23–33 μm (mean: 29 μm)

Pharynx 8–12 μm (mean: 10 μm) × 5–8 μm (mean: 8 μm)

Ventral sucker 13–25 μm (mean: 18 μm) × 8–20 μm (mean: 16 μm)

Excretory bladder 18–55μm (mean: 33 μm) × 10–35 μm (mean: 20 μm)

Tail 10–28 μm (mean: 21 μm) × 25–88 μm (mean: 44 μm)

Figure 3. 

Images of Loxogenoides bicolor (Krull, 1933). a. specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. drawing of cercaria. c. sporocyst stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – eb: excretory bladder; ge: genital primordium; p: pharynx; pg: penetration gland; os: oral sucker; s: stylet; ta: tail; vi: virgulate organ; vs: ventral sucker. Scale bars: 50 µm.

1.2 Loxogenes liberum Seno, 1907

(Fig. 4)

Body oval. Oral sucker at the anterior end of body, with stylet. Virgulate organ present. Ventral sucker roundish, smaller than oral sucker. Pharynx very small, a prepharynx, an esophagus and ceca were not observed. Four pairs of penetration glands present, located near the middle of the body; the two anterior pairs with fine granules and the two posterior pairs with coarse granules. Excretory bladder V-shaped. Tail shorter than body, rather slender and spinose at its tip.

The cercariae develop within sporocysts.

The infection rate was 0.15% (23/15,076) (Table 3).

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 65–93 μm (mean: 81 μm) × 95–120 μm (mean: 108 μm)

Stylet 3–3 μm (mean: 3 μm) × 10–23 μm (mean: 16 μm)

Oral sucker 13–30 μm (mean: 24 μm) × 10–28 μm (mean: 20 μm)

Pharynx 5–15 μm (mean: 10 μm) × 8–10 μm (mean: 8 μm)

Ventral sucker 8–33 μm (mean: 18 μm) × 13–28 μm (mean: 19 μm)

Excretory bladder 13–35 μm (mean: 27 μm) × 13–48 μm (mean: 37 μm)

Tail 15–25 μm (mean: 20 μm) × 40–90 μm (mean: 72 μm)

Figure 4. 

Loxogenes liberum Seno, 1907. a. specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. drawing of cercaria. c. sporocyst stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – eb: excretory bladder; os: oral sucker, p: pharynx, pg: penetration gland, s: stylet; ta: tail; vs: ventral sucker. Scale bars: 50 µm.

1.3 Acanthatrium histaense Koga, 1953

(Fig. 5)

Body oval. Oral sucker with stylet, virgulate organ near oral sucker. Pharynx round and short, esophagus absent. Ventral sucker smaller than oral sucker. Two pairs of penetration glands present, one anterior pair with fine granules and one posterior pair with coarse granules. Excretory bladder near posterior end of body. Tail short, spinose at its end.

The cercariae develop within sporocysts.

The infection rate was 1.11% (167/15,076) (Table 3).

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 54–93 μm (mean: 78 μm) × 80–110 μm (mean: 100 μm)

Stylet 9–14 μm (mean: 11 μm) × 12–14 μm (mean: 12 μm)

Oral sucker 26–33 μm (mean: 31 μm) × 35–41 μm (mean: 38 μm)

Pharynx 11–16 μm (mean: 14 μm) × 13–25 μm (mean: 21 μm)

Ventral sucker 15–17 μm (mean: 17 μm) × 16–19 μm (mean: 18 μm)

Excretory bladder 9–13 μm (mean: 10 μm) × 21–47 μm (mean: 39 μm)

Tail 18–26 μm (mean: 24 μm) × 27–76 μm (mean: 69 μm)

Figure 5. 

Acanthatrium histaense Koga, 1953. a. specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. drawing of cercaria. c. sporocyst stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – eb: excretory bladder; os: oral sucker; s: stylet; p: pharynx; pg: penetration gland; ta: tail; vi: virgulate organ; vs: ventral sucker. Scale bars: 50 µm.

Type 2. Armatae xiphidiocercariae cercariae

Microphallidae Ward, 1901 (sensu Travassos 1921)

2.1 Maritreminoides caridinae (Yamaguti & Nisimura, 1944) (sensu Chen 1957)

(Fig. 6)

Body oval, rather small. Stylet present, but virgulate organ absent. Pharynx small, esophagus Y-shaped. Ventral sucker poorly developed. Two pairs penetration glands present, located near the middle of the body. Excretory bladder thin-walled, located in the posterior part of the body. Tail long and round.

The cercariae develop within sporocysts.

The infection rate was 0.10% (15/15,076) (Table 3).

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 78–98 μm (mean: 89 μm) × 105–133 μm (mean: 113 μm)

Stylet 3–3 μm (mean: 3 μm) × 10–18 μm (mean: 15 μm)

Oral sucker 18–30 μm (mean: 25 μm) × 20–30 μm (mean: 23 μm)

Pharynx 5–10 μm (mean: 8 μm) × 5–10 μm (mean: 9 μm)

Ventral sucker 15–20 μm (mean: 19 μm) × 15–20 μm (mean: 18 μm)

Excretory bladder 30–40 μm (mean: 34 μm) × 15–18 μm (mean: 16 μm)

Tail 13–20 μm (mean: 16 μm) × 85–125 μm (mean: 106 μm)

Figure 6. 

Maritreminoides caridinae (Yamaguti & Nisimura, 1944). a. specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. drawing of cercaria. c. sporocyst stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – eb: excretory bladder; ep: esophagus; os: oral sucker; p: pharynx; pg: penetration gland; s: stylet; ta: tail; vs: ventral sucker. Scale bars: 50 µm.

2.2 Maritreminoides obstipus (Van Cleave & Mueller, 1932) (sensu Rankin 1939)

(Fig. 7)

Body oval, rather small. Oral and ventral sucker of approximately equal in size. Oral sucker with long stylet, virgulate organ absent. Pharynx rather large, esophagus short and slender, bifurcating, located between oral and ventral sucker. Genital primordium located just posterior of ventral sucker. Four pairs of penetration glands grouped together near anterior margin of ventral sucker. Excretory bladder thin-walled. Tail shorter than body and round, not spinose at its tip.

The cercariae develop within sporocysts.

The infection rate was 0.05% (7/15,076) (Table 3).

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 73–103 μm (mean: 89 μm) × 85–128 μm (mean: 106 μm)

Stylet 3–3 μm (mean: 3 μm) × 13–18 μm (mean: 16 μm)

Oral sucker 20–30 μm (mean: 25 μm) × 13–30 μm (mean: 24 μm)

Pharynx 8–13 μm (mean: 9 μm) × 5–13 μm (mean: 9 μm)

Ventral sucker 13–20 μm (mean: 16 μm) × 10–20 μm (mean: 15 μm)

Excretory bladder 18–35 μm (mean: 28 μm) × 13–23 μm (mean: 16 μm)

Tail 15–28 μm (mean: 20 μm) × 65–113 μm (mean: 82 μm)

Figure 7. 

Maritreminoides obstipus (Van Cleave & Müller, 1932). a. specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. drawing of cercaria. c. sporocyst stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – eb: excretory bladder; ep: esophagus; ge: genital primordium; os: oral sucker; p: pharynx; pg: penetration gland; s: stylet; ta: tail; vs: ventral sucker. Scale bars: 50 µm.

Type 3. Parapleurophocercous cercariae

Heterophyidae (Leiper, 1909) (sensu Odhner 1914)

3.1 Haplorchis pumilio (Looss, 1896) (sensu Looss 1899)

(Fig. 8)

The cercarial body is pear-shaped. It has a circular oral sucker that is located near the proximal end of the body. The mouth is equipped with transverse rows of spines. The small ventral sucker is located approximately at two-thirds of the body length measured from the front. The small pharynx is situated in the anterior part of the body just distal of the oral sucker between the two distinct eyespots; an esophagus is absent. There are seven pairs of penetration glands, which are arranged laterally in two longitudinal rows in the posterior two thirds of the body. The excretory bladder has an oval shape and is dark pigmented. A genital primordium is present, located between the ventral sucker and the excretory bladder. The tail is longer than the body and rather slender, and is equipped with lateral finfolds proximally and a dorsoventral finfold along the longer distal portion.

The cercariae develop within rediae.

The infection rate was 0.72% (108/15,076) (Table 3).

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 91–141 μm (mean: 125 μm) × 169–296 μm (mean: 258 μm)

Oral sucker 28–49 μm (mean: 37 μm) × 28–49 μm (mean: 36 μm)

Pharynx 9–11 μm (mean: 10 μm) × 13–20 μm (mean: 16 μm)

Ventral sucker 15–25 μm (mean: 19 μm) × 15–24 μm (mean: 18 μm)

Excretory bladder 29–41 μm (mean: 35 μm) × 29–41 μm (mean: 35 μm)

Tail 11–37 μm (mean: 31 μm) × 466–529 μm (mean: 491 μm)

Lateral finfolds 9–18 µm (mean: 14.75 µm) × 70–129 µm (mean: 111 µm)

Figure 8. 

Haplorchis pumilio (Looss, 1896). a. specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. drawing of cercaria. c. redia stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – dvf: dorsoventral finfold; eb: excretory bladder; es: eyespot; lf: lateral finfold; os: oral sucker; p: pharynx; pg: penetration gland; ta – tail; vs: ventral sucker. Scale bars: 50 µm.

3.2 Haplorchis taichui (Nishigori, 1924) (sensu Witenberg 1930)

(Fig. 9)

Body is oval in shape. The oral sucker is located at the anterior of body. The mouth aperture is equipped with transverse rows of spines. A pair of pigmented eyespots and pharynx are present. Seven pairs of penetration glands extend from the pharynx to the posterior end of the body. Cystogenous cells are arranged in lateral fields from the level of the pharynx to the posterior end of the body. The excretory bladder is saccular and thick-walled. The tail is longer than the body. There are lateral finfolds at one-third of tail tunk and a dorso-ventral finfold at the distal portion.

The cercariae develop within rediae.

The infection rate was 0.09% (14/15,076) (Table 3)

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 43–83 µm (mean: 61 µm) × 105–140 µm (mean: 120 µm)

Oral sucker 20–30 µm (mean: 25 µm) × 23–35 µm (mean: 28 µm)

Ventral sucker 15–33 µm (mean: 23 µm) × 18–30 µm (mean: 25 µm)

Pharynx 8–20 µm (mean: 14 µm) × 8–25 µm (mean: 12 µm)

Excretory bladder 10–50 µm (mean: 26 µm) × 20–35 µm (mean: 26 µm)

Tail 20–30 µm (mean: 26 µm) × 263–355 µm (mean: 311 µm)

Lateral finfolds 8–15 µm (mean: 13 µm) × 75–125 µm (mean: 103 µm)

Dorsal finfolds 5–23 µm (mean: 13 µm) × 183–253 µm (mean: 218 µm)

Figure 9. 

Haplorchis taichui (Nishigori, 1924). a. specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. drawing of cercaria. c. redia stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – cc: cystogenous cells; dvf: dorsoventral finfold; eb: excretory bladder; es: eyespot; ge: genital primordium; lf: lateral finfold; os: oral sucker; p: pharynx; pg: penetration gland; ta: tail; vs: ventral sucker. Scale bars: 50 µm.

3.3 Stictodora tridactyla Martin & Kuntz, 1955

(Fig. 10)

The body is oval in shape. The oral sucker is located at the anterior end of the body. There are three transverse rows of oral spines present. Seven pairs of penetration glands in four groups of 3:4:4:3 are present that are situated between the pharynx and the excretory bladder. A pair of pigmented eyespots and a pharynx are present. The ventral sucker is poorly developed. The excretory bladder is V-shaped and thick-walled. The tail is longer than the body. There is a bilateral finfold and a dorso-ventral finfold on the tail.

The cercariae develop within rediae.

The infection rate was 2.92% (440/15,076) (Table 3).

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 80–118 μm (mean: 99 μm) × 168–207 μm (mean: 202 μm)

Oral sucker 28–38 μm (mean: 34 μm) × 30–50 μm (mean: 41 μm)

Eye spots 5–15 μm (mean: 9 μm) × 5–15 μm (mean: 9 μm)

Pharynx 10–22 μm (mean: 17 μm) × 10–28 μm (mean: 19 μm)

Ventral sucker 13–35 μm (mean: 23 μm) × 15–45 μm (mean: 27 μm)

Excretory bladder 43–90 μm (mean: 64 μm) × 20–55 μm (mean: 39 μm)

Tail 20–33 μm (mean: 26 μm) × 405–495 μm (mean: 458 μm)

Lateral finfold 10–25 μm (mean: 18 μm) × 74–148 μm (mean: 108)

Figure 10. 

Stictodora tridactyla Martin & Kuntz, 1955. a. specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. drawing of cercaria. c. redia stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – dvf: dorsal finfold; eb: excretory bladder; es: eyespot; lf: lateral finfold; os: oral sucker; p: pharynx; pg: penetration gland; ta: tail; vs: ventral sucker. Scale bars: 50 µm.

Type 4. Pleurophocercous cercariae

Heterophyidae (Leiper, 1909) (sensu Odhner 1914)

4.1 Centrocestus formosanus (Nishigori, 1924) (sensu Price 1932)

(Fig. 11)

The body is oval in shape. The oral sucker has oral spines or rostellar hooks like a tapeworm on the dorsal wall of the mouth aperture. A pair of eyespots is located above the prenetration glands at the same level as the pharynx. There are seven pairs of penetration glands. The genital primordial is elongated-triangular and located between the ventral sucker and the excretory bladder. The excretory bladder has dark granules and is thin-walled. The tail is slender and longer than the body. It is equipped with very narrow finfolds.

The cercariae develop within rediae.

The infection rate was 1.14% (172/15,076) (Table 3).

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 45–73 μm (mean: 65 μm) × 83–121 μm (mean: 118 μm)

Oral sucker 17–27 μm (mean: 25 μm) × 18–30 μm (mean: 26 μm)

Pharynx 8–10 μm (mean: 9 μm) × 9–11 μm (mean: 10 μm)

Ventral sucker 13–17 μm (mean: 15 μm) × 14–18 μm (mean: 16 μm)

Excretory bladder 25–31 μm (mean: 29 μm) × 39–53 μm (mean: 46 μm)

Tail 15–18 μm (mean: 15 μm) × 70–93 μm (mean: 83 μm)

Figure 11. 

Centrocestus formosanus (Nishigori, 1924). a. Specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. Drawing of cercaria. c. Redia stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – eb: excretory bladder; es: eyespot; ff: finfold; ge: genital primordium; os: oral sucker; p: pharynx; pg: penetration gland; rh: rostellar hooks; ta: tail; vs: ventral sucker. Scale bars: 50 µm.

Type 5. Megarulous cercariae

Philophthalmidae (Looss, 1899) (sensu Travassos 1918)

5.1 Philophthalmus gralli Mathis & Léger, 1910

(Fig. 12)

The body is elongate pear-shaped and distinctly granulose. Eyespots are absent. The pharynx is large and extends into an esophagus that is bifurcating (Y-shape) into two blind ending intestinal caeca that almost reach the posterior end of the body. The ventral sucker is bigger than the oral sucker. The excretory bladder is rather small. The tail is about as long as the body and relatively slender. There is an adhesive gland present at its tip.

The cercariae encyst rapidly after developing within rediae.

The infection rate was 0.02% (3/15,076) (Table 3).

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 143–175 μm (mean: 153 μm) × 438–470 μm (mean: 453 μm)

Oral sucker 50–68 μm (mean: 60 μm) × 63–73 μm (mean: 68 μm)

Pharynx 15–23 μm (mean: 20 μm) × 28–38 μm (mean: 34 μm)

Ventral sucker 60–78 μm (mean: 67 μm) × 48–80 μm (mean: 6 μm)

Excretory bladder 43–48 μm (mean: 45 μm) × 33–40 μm (mean: 36 μm)

Tail 40–50 μm (mean: 45 μm) × 463–475 μm (mean: 469 μm)

Figure 12. 

Philophthalmus gralli Mathis & Léger, 1910 a. specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. drawing of cercaria. c. redia stained with 0.5% neutral red. d. metacercaria stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – ag: adhesive gland; eb: excretory bladder; ep: esophagus; os: oral sucker; p: pharynx; ta: tail; vs: ventral sucker. Scale bars: 50 µm.

Type 6. Furcocercous cercariae

Sanguinicolidae Graff, 1907

6.1 Cardicola alseae Meade & Pratt, 1965

(Fig. 13)

The body is elongate-oval, slightly bent. Eyespots, a pharynx, an esophagus, intestinal caeca and a ventral sucker are absent. There is a narrow dorsal finfold in the middle part of the body. The penetration gland is located in the anterior part of the body. The excretory bladder is small and thin-walled, located at the posterior end of the body. The tail is forked. The stem of the tail is rather thick and longer than the furcae. Finfolds are present along the margins of the furcae.

The cercariae develop within sporocysts.

The infection rate was 0.05% (7/15,076) (Table 3).

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 19–40 μm (mean: 30 μm) × 73–112 μm (mean: 96 μm)

Anterior organ 12–16 μm (mean: 14 μm) × 15–22 μm (mean: 19 μm)

Excretory bladder 4–8 μm (mean: 6 μm) × 12–37 μm (mean: 23 μm)

Tail stem 16–32 μm (mean: 28 μm) × 155–199 μm (mean: 187 μm)

Tail furcal 8–12 μm (mean: 10 μm) × 29–56 μm (mean: 52 μm)

Dorso-median finfold 6–15 μm (mean: 11 μm)

Figure 13. 

Cardicola alseae Meade & Pratt, 1965. a. specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. drawing of cercaria. c. sporocyst stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – dmf: dorso-median finfold; eb: excretory bladder; f: furca; ff: furcal finfold; os: oral sucker; pg: penetration gland; ta: tail. Scale bars: 50 µm.

Diplostomidae Poirier, 1886

6.2 Alaria mustelae Bosma, 1931

(Fig. 14)

The body is elongate-oval in shape. A pair of unpigmented eyespots is present. A prepharynx is present but rather short. The pharynx is small and roundish in shape. The esophagus is long, bifurcating into two intestinal caeca that are shorter than half the length of the esophagus. The oral sucker is larger than the ventral sucker. There are two pairs of penetration glands, filled with dark granules that are located around the ventral sucker. There is a Y-shaped excretory bladder located medially close to the posterior end of the body. The tail is longer than the body and divided into two furcae. The tail stem is slender and about as long as the furcae.

The cercariae develop within sporocysts.

The infection rate was 0.15% (23/15,076) (Table 3).

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 106–155 μm (mean: 139 μm) × 186–282 μm (mean: 257 μm)

Oral sucker 29–41 μm (mean: 37 μm) × 29–42 μm (mean: 38 μm)

Pharynx 12–16 μm (mean: 14 μm) × 15–20 μm (mean: 17 μm)

Ventral sucker 16–38 μm (mean: 26 μm) × 16–32 μm (mean: 23 μm)

Tail 49–62 μm (mean: 57 μm) × 221–311 μm (mean: 275 μm)

Fork-tail 40–65 μm (mean: 61 μm) × 241–321 μm (mean: 286 μm)

Figure 14. 

Alaria mustelae Bosma, 1931. a. specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. drawing of cercaria. c. redia stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – eb: excretory bladder; ep: esophagus; et: excretory tubule; f: furca; os: oral sucker; p: pharynx; pg: penetration gland; ta: tail; vs: ventral sucker. Scale bars: 50 µm.

Transversotrematidae Yamaguti, 1954

6.3 Transversotrema laruei Velasquez, 1958

(Fig. 15)

The body is of a bowl-like shape. The surface of the body is covered with spines that have the appearance of fish scales. The genital pore of the seminal vesicle is located in the anterior part of the body. Eyespots are present. The mouth is located near the ventral sucker. The esophagus is narrow and the intestinal caeca form a ring. There is one pair of testes present, and an ovary is located anterolateral to the left of the testes. The excretory bladder is small and short, and is situated close to the posterior end of the body. The tail is longer than the body and possesses spatulate furcae. At the base of the tail a pair of bilaterally symmetrical appendages is present, each equipped with an adhesive pad at its distal end.

The cercariae develop within rediae.

The infection rate was 0.05% (8/15,076) (Table 3).

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 460–600 µm (mean: 533 µm) × 280–430 µm (mean: 362 µm)

Genital pore 20–40 µm (mean: 31 µm) × 20–50 µm (mean: 34 µm)

Ventral sucker 50–110 µm (mean: 76 µm) × 50–120 µm (mean: 77 µm)

Testis 30–120 µm (mean: 88 µm) × 40–120 µm (mean: 85 µm)

Excretory bladder 20–70 µm (mean: 40 µm) × 40–90 µm (mean: 57 µm)

Tail 120–180 µm (mean: 146 µm) × 620–800 µm (mean: 686 µm)

Tail stem 120–180 µm (mean: 146 µm) × 390–530 µm (mean: 467 µm)

Tail furcal 80–150 µm (mean: 111 µm) × 180–290 µm (mean: 219 µm)

Appendages 40–70 µm (mean: 58 µm) × 120–150 µm (mean: 138 µm)

Figure 15. 

Transversotrema laruei Velasquez, 1958. a. specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. drawing of cercaria. c. redia (left) and cercaria (right) stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – adp: adhesive pad; ap: appendages; eb: excretory bladder; ep: esophagus; es: eyespot; f: furca; gp: genital pore; m: mouth; ov: ovary; ta: tail; te: testes; vs: ventral sucke. Scale bars: 50 µm.

Type 7. Echinostome cercariae

(Fig. 16)

The body is elongate pear-shaped. Eyespots are absent. The oral sucker is circular in shape and is equipped with collar spines. The prepharynx is long. The esophagus is shorter than the prepharynx, bifurcating into two intestinal caeca that almost reach to the posterior end of the body. The relatively large ventral sucker is located approximately at two-thirds of the body length measured from the front. Penetration glands are absent. The excretory bladder is small and triangular in shape, its two main collecting tubes beginning at the level of the esophagus. The tail is slender and almost of the same length as the body.

The cercariae develop within rediae.

The infection rate was 0.07% (10/15,076) (Table 3).

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 150–163 µm (mean: 151 µm) × 243–325 µm (mean: 270 µm)

Oral sucker 38–48 µm (mean: 44 µm) × 38–48 µm (mean: 44 µm)

Ventral sucker 40–73 µm (mean: 62 µm) × 55–63 µm (mean: 60 µm)

Pharynx 13–18 µm (mean: 14 µm) × 20–30 µm (mean: 24 µm)

Excretory bladder 18–55 µm (mean: 38 µm) × 18–55 µm (mean: 33 µm)

Tail 28–40 µm (mean: 34 µm) × 195–313 µm (mean: 240 µm)

Figure 16. 

Echinostome cercaria. a. specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. drawing of cercaria. c. redia stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – cs: collar spines; eb: excretory bladder; ep: esophagus; mct: main collecting tube; os: oral sucker; p: pharynx; pp: prepharynx; ta: tail; vs: ventral sucker. Scale bars: 50 µm.

Type 8. Gymnocephalous cercariae

(Fig. 17)

The body is oval and covered with spines. The terminal oral sucker is equipped with minute spines. Eyespots are absent. The prepharynx is long and thin. The pharynx is rather large and of a round shape. The esophagus is short but rather wide, bifurcating into two intestinal caeca that extend towards the posterior part of the body. There are 4–5 penetration glands present that are located laterally of the caeca between the level of the pharynx and the ventral sucker. The ventral sucker is of about the same size as the oral sucker. The excretory bladder is roundish, with a thin wall and located medially near the posterior end of the body. Two thin, undulating excretory tubules that begin just anterior of the pharynx insert into the excretory bladder. The tail is longer than the body, with the opening duct of the excretory bladder located at its end. There are groups of of 3–5 distinct pigment granules present in the tail but flame cells could not observed.

The cercariae develop within rediae.

The infection rate was 0.01% (1/15,076) (Table 3).

Size range and average size (in micrometers, calculated from 10 cercariae):

Body 115–160 μm (mean: 134 μm) × 150–195 μm (mean: 176 μm)

Oral sucker 30–40 μm (mean: 33 μm) × 28–40 μm (mean: 36 μm)

Pharynx 8–20 μm (mean: 13 μm) × 13–28 μm (mean: 22 μm)

Ventral sucker 35–48 μm (mean: 41 μm) × 33–45 μm (mean: 41 μm)

Excretory bladder 28–45 μm (mean: 39 μm) × 25–43 μm (mean: 31 μm)

Tail 23–35 μm (mean: 27 μm) × 183–223 μm (mean: 199 μm)

Figure 17. 

Gymnocephalous cercaria. a. Specimen stained with 0.5% neutral red. b. Drawing of cercaria. c. Redia stained with 0.5% neutral red. Abbreviations – eb: excretory bladder; ep: esophagus; et: excretory tubule; os: oral sucker; p: pharynx; pg: penetration gland; ta: tail; vs: ventral sucker. Scale bars: 50 µm.

Molecular analysis

In the present study, ITS2 sequences from nine distinct cercarial types (collected during the second period of this study) of a total of fifteen trematode species found in Thai populations of Tarebia granifera could be amplified by PCR and sequenced. The ITS2 sequences of the virgulate xiphidiocercariae and the armatae xiphidiocercariae had a length of approximately 320 bp, while the ITS2 sequences of the parapleurophocercous cercariae and the pleurophocercous cercariae had a length of approximately 380 bp. The ITS2 sequences of the remaining cercarial types, i.e. megarulous cercariae, echinostome cercariae and gymnocephalous cercariae, had a length of approximately 500 bp.

The phylogenetic tree obtained from the neighbor-joining analysis (Fig. 18) was rooted with the nematode Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Chen, 1935) (GenBank accession number: HQ540551.1). All trematode species from Thai populations of T. granifera that were distinguished on the basis of cercarial morphology and for which more than one sequence was obtained, formed well supported groups in the phylogenetic analysis. These are highlighted in the following:

Figure 18. 

Neighbor-joining tree on the basis of ITS2 sequences of cercarial species obtained from Thai populations of Tarebia granifera (Lamarck, 1816) and several published sequences obtained from GenBank. Nodes are annotated with bootstrap support values ≥ 50. Taxon names and voucher or GenBank accession numbers are provided at the tips of the tree (see also Table 1). First and second intermediate hosts and definitive hosts are indicated (see legend). Abbreviations – DH: definitive host: IH1: first intermediate host; IH2: second intermediate host. Cercarial types – a: virgulate xiphidiocercariae; b: armatae xiphidiocercariae; c: gymnocephalous cercariae; d: echinostome cercariae; e: megarulous cercariae; f: parapleurophocercous cercariae; g: pleurophocercous cercariae.

– Specimens of S. tridactyla, C. formosanus, Centrocestus sp., H. taichui, O. viverrini, O. felineus (Rivolta, 1884) and H. pumilio, which all have cyprinoid fish as a second intermediate host, were grouped together with relatively high support.

– The sequences of the echinostome cercaria and the gymnocephalous cercaria obtained from T. granifera were grouped together with relatively high support.

– This latter clade in turn formed a well-supported clade together with P. gralli and Fasciola hepatica Linnaeus, 1758 and Fasciola gigantica Cobbold, 1856 (for which we obtained data from previously published sequences).

– A group of species with arthropods as second intermediate hosts, i.e. L. bicolor, L. liberum, Lecithodendrium spathulatum (Ozaki, 1929), Lecithodendrium linstowi Dollfus, 1931 and M. obstipus, formed a moderately supported group in the phylogenetic analysis. The relationships of species within this clade, however, could not be resolved robustly.

Discussion

Thiarid gastropods, that transmit parasites of native birds, fishes or mammals, have frequently been reported as first intermediate hosts of trematodes affecting the respiratory, intestinal and hepatic systems not only in some domestic animals but also in humans. As outlined in the Introduction, this represents a serious threat to public health. For example, thiarid snails such as Melanoides tuberculata, T. granifera, Mieniplotia scabra and Sermyla riqueti have been reported as the intermediate hosts of a wide array of diverse trematodes, such as Haplorchis pumilio, H. taichui, Loxogenoides bicolor, Centrocestus formosanus, Acanthatrium hitaense, Haematoloechus similes, Cloacitrema philippinum, Transversotrema laruei, Stictodora tridactyla, Apatemon gracilis, Mesostephanus appendicalatus, Cardicola alseae and Alaria mustelae (Dechruksa et al. 2007, Ukong et al. 2007, Krailas et al. 2011, 2014). Furthermore, the phenotypically highly diverse and, thus, systematically problematic thiarid snails are widely distributed in Southeast Asia and Australasia (e.g. Glaubrecht 1996, 2009, 2011, Glaubrecht et al. 2009). This not only renders them most suitable objects for various systematic, biogeographical and evolutionary studies but also brings them into special focus from a parasitological perspective.

The present study aimed at bringing together the classical parasitological approach of the morphological characterization of the cercariae stages of trematodes obtained from their snail host, with a molecular parasitology approach, presenting a phylogenetic analyses of the minute intestinal flukes identified from their thiarids host, exemplified here for the first time with Tarebia granifera from Thailand. This particular snails host is common in many Thai freshwater systems, inhabiting rivers, lakes, streams and ponds (Hyslop 2003). Pillay and Perissinotto (2008) recorded that T. granifera was also able to colonize moderately saline habitats (brackish water). Without doubt, therefore, this thiarid is well established as an intermediate host for several species of trematodes.

We here focussed on the larval trematode infections found in this snail collected in various regions in Thailand during two periods of field work. When we started the research in the first period (2004–2009), T. granifera was found in 18 sampling sites. In the second period (2014–2016), we not only went back to the same sampling sites but also added samples from new locations. Thus, snails from a total of 72 locations could be analysed from all over Thailand, covering for the first time most of the distributional range of the snail host T. granifera in this country. In more than two-thirds of these locations, i.e. in populations at 51 sampling sites, infected snails were found, indicating the wide prevalence of these trematodes in Thailand.

As we mentioned above, only three species of trematodes, viz. L. bicolor, S. tridactyla, C. formosanus, were found to commonly occur in Tarebia granifera from most river systems and regions in Thailand. They were also found during all seasons, thus independent of the time of the year the snails were collected. By re-visiting during the years 2014 to 2016 the same locations of the first collecting period five to ten years earlier, and recording infected snails in 18 of these sampling sites, we also found that these trematode infections are apparently long-lasting, in the sense of a permanent phenomenon of these snail host populations, despite seasonal variation in the abundances of plants and animals in general (Shimadzu et al. 2013). Among the total of 15 species from 8 types of cercariae recorded in our study, we found only half of them (i.e. 8 species from 4 types) during the first period; whereas 11 species from 7 types were found in the second period. Thus, with the new study period and with collecting at various other and thus new locations all over Thailand we were able to expand our knowledge with respect to the taxonomical and geographical aspects of this analysis.

In the following we discuss in more details various aspects for the distinct trematode species found in their Thai thiarid snail host Tarebia granifera:

Parapleurophocercous cercariae and pleurophocercous cercariae were reported to be commonly found also in other freshwater snails in Thailand, such as e.g. Melanoides tuberculata (Krailas et al. 2014). In this study, three species of parapleurophocercous cercariae and one species of pleurophocercous cercariae were found in T. granifera.

Various reports have indicated the presence of parapleurophocercous cercariae and some species of pleurophocercous cercariae of the intestinal trematodes Heterophyidae, such as H. taichui, H. pumilio, S. tridactyla and C. formosanus (e.g. Chontananarth and Wongsawad 2013, Waikagul and Thaekham 2014). These parasites have an aquatic life cycle, using freshwater snails as the first and cyprinid fish as the second intermediate host, with definitive hosts being fish-eating mammals and humans (Nithikathkul and Wongsawad 2008, Krailas et al. 2011, 2014, 2016).

In this study, we found human trematodes, viz. H. taichui, H. pumilio, S. tridactyla and C. formosanus. Especially the snail infections by the minute intestinal fluke of S. tridactyla (2.92%) and C. formosanus (1.14%) showed a high level of prevalence in Thailand. In addition, H. taichui is important for public health, as was shown in several studies. For example, Kumchoo et al. (2005) reported high prevalence of fish as being the second intermediate host (91.4%) of H. taichui from Mae Taeng district of Chiang Mai province. Also, in the PDR Laos many patients have been infected by H. taichui, as cases were reported with mucosal ulceration, chronic inflammation and fibrosis of submucosa (Sukontason et al. 2005, Sohn et al. 2014). Chai et al. (2013) reported for seven patients who were infected by C. formosanus in Laos that they had abdominal pain, indigestion and diarrhea. Chung et al. (2011) reported the first case in Korea for patients being infected by H. pumilio. This heterophyid trematode is an important and continuing public health problem in many countries, as there are case reports not only from Southeast Asia but also from other Asian countries.

Therefore, it is from this perspective that for the epidemiology of zoonosis in general we recommend the study of snail intermediate hosts of human and animal trematode infections. It would be interesting to study whether there are geographically related higher or lower incidences of human infections, perhaps also correlated to infected fishes in these areas.

In contrast, known as parasites to animals only, xiphidiocercariae can be distinguished by their stylet organ in the mouth part of the cercariae. They can be divided into two morphological types, the first type being the virgulate xiphidiocercariae, and the second type the armatae xiphidiocercariae (see e.g. Frandsen and Christensen 1984). The virgulate xiphidiocercariae have a virgular organ present in the region of the oral sucker. For this group, the present study reported three species of parasites from the Lecithodendriidae, viz. L. bicolor, L. liberum and A. histaense, for which the hosts are amphibians (Brooks et al. 1985). It should be noted that we found L. bicolor to have the highest prevalence, with an infection rate of 3.84 %, and to be distributed in every water body, river system and region of Thailand. In the second group, i.e. the armatae xiphidiocercariae, the cercariae do not possess a virgular organ. For this group, we here reported two species, viz. M. caridinae and M. obstipus of the Microphallidae, which are parasites in birds as definite hosts. For the time being, we refrain from speculating on what might cause these differences before more detailed studies will be done.

Megarulous cercariae have been morphologically characterized as belonging to Philophthalmus. This parasite is commonly known as the oriental avian eyefluke and it had been reported in connection with human accidental infections (Waikagul et al. 2006, Derraik 2008). Nollen and Murray (1978) reported that P. gralli parasitized the conjunctival sac of various galliform and anseriform birds. This fluke was also found in ostriches, causing conjunctivitis. In earlier studies the cercariae of this trematode were found in the thiarid snail Melanoides tuberculata as intermediate host (Kalatan et al. 1997, Pinto and de Melo 2010, Krailas et al. 2014). In this study, we found P. gralli now also in the thiarid Tarebia granifera from the Phachi River in western Thailand. This river system originates in the Tenasserim mountain range and tributes to the Mae Klong river system to the east of it.

Furcocercous cercariae are generally from trematodes of the Sanguinicolidae; they develop to cercariae in brackish-water and freshwater snails, while the definitive hosts were found in fishes. In this study, we found cercariae of three species, viz. C. alseae, A. mustelae and T. laruei, to parasitize Tarebia granifera as intermediate host. Cercariae of all three trematode species were also found in other thiarid snails, as they were reported in Melanoides tuberculata (Krailas et al. 2014, Anucherngchai et al. 2017).

Echinostome cercariae are distributed throughout Southeast Asia (Chai 2009). Most species mainly parasitize avian hosts, such as migratory birds, but sometimes also infect mammals including humans. The echinostome trematodes are associated with the ingestion of raw snails and amphibians that transmit metacercariae as the infective stage (Esteban and Antoli 2009). In the present study, echinostome cercariae were found in Tarebia granifera populations from the north of Thailand only; which corroborates the report by Nithikathkul and Wongsawad (2008) that echinostomiasis cases have been commonly found in the north and northeast of Thailand.

Gymnocephalous cercariae are small larval stages of trematodes, in general attributed to the Fasciolidae (e.g. Schell 1970). In this study, we found only one snail infection with cercariae that morphologically are obviously attributable to Fasciola cercariae. However, the molecular identification showed that these cercariae were actually neither F. gigantica nor F. hepatica. Instead, the phylogentic analyses indicate a closer affinity of these sequences to those from cercariae with echinostoma type. By morphology the echinostome cercariae are clearly distinguishable by being elongated spinose with a reniform collar, armed with a single or double row of spines surrounding the dorsal and lateral margins of the oral sucker (Anucherngchai et al. 2016, Ayoub et al. 2017). Thus, our study here revealed one case of obvious conflict between the morphologically based identification and the molecular indication of affinity, which clearly is in need to be studied further. We cannot exclude the possibility of a simple laboratory mix-up, but should also keep in mind e.g. hybrid effects.

In a previous report, the gymnocephalous cercariae were produced by trematodes of the Fasciolidae. They were found in Biomphalaria sp., Bulinus sp., Ceratophallus sp., Gabbiella sp., Gyraulus sp., Lymnaea sp., and in Melanoides sp. (Frandsen and Christensen 1984). However, thiarid snails were never reported with fasciolid trematode infections in Thailand. Even though, the morphology of gymnocephalous cercariae was obviously to be Fasciola cercariae. The sequence of DNA was shown to match with that from the group of echinostome cercariae.

Molecular analyses of cercaria and their host correlations

In general, morphological as well as molecular studies of cercariae were able to confirm the specific identity and prevalence of various infectious trematodes in Thai freshwater snails of Tarebia granifera. In this study, we found that the ITS2 marker allowed to distinguish a total of nine trematode species, with the cercariae attributable to seven of the morphologically distinguishable types, viz. the parapleurophocercous cercariae, pleurophocercous cercariae, the virgulate xiphidiocercariae and armatae xiphidiocercariae, megarulous cercariae, as well as echinostome cercariae and gymnocephalous cercariae; only the furcocercous cercariae were not available for molecular studies. And in one case only we found a conflict insofar, as the sequence data revealed that cercariae of the morphologically distinguished gymnocephalous type grouped closely with those of the echinostome type.

We also used the ITS2 marker for a phylogenetic reconstruction (Fig. 18), in which two characteristics are most noteworthy: First, while the relationships of species within molecular clades found could not be resolved robustly, our analyses revealed, second, two well-supported major molecular clusters or groups. These clusters can be well interpreted in context of their respective zoonotic parasites and human pathogens.

The first group with parapleurophocercous and pleurophocercous cercariae, respectively (marked f and g in Fig. 18), i.e. S. tridactyla, C. formosanus, Centrocestus sp., H. taichui, H. pumilio, O. viverrini, O. felineus, all have cyprinoid fish as second intermediate host, while birds and mammals, including in particular humans, are the definite host. Note that the latter two trematode species have a bithyniid instead a thiarid snail as first intermediate host.

In a second group cluster trematode species with virgulate xiphidiocercariae and armatae xiphidiocercariae, respectively (marked a and b in Fig. 18), i.e. L. bicolor, L. liberum, Lecithodendrium spathulatum, L. linstowi and M. obstipus), which all have arthropods (Insecta or Crustacea) as second intermediate hosts while amphibians, birds and mammals, but with the exclusion of humans, are the definite hosts.

In addition, also the sequences of trematode species with echinostome cercaria and the gymnocephalous cercaria obtained from T. granifera grouped together with relatively high support. However, no clear picture as to a correlation with their second intermediate hosts and definitive hosts is visible to date, as we lack knowledge on the latter in particular for the gymnocephalous cercaria. Nevertheless, the latter two form a well-supported clade together with P. gralli, F. hepatica and F. gigantica, which all have gymnocephalous, echinostome or megarulous cercariae (Fig. 18, c,d,e). Note that the latter two trematode species are known to have an eupulmonate instead of a thiarid snail host. Interestingly, in this latter monophyletic clade, formed by P. gralli together with F. hepatica and F. gigantica, only those trematodes are known to be human pathogens (as definite hosts) when the cercaria are encysting in the open instead of parasitizing a second intermediate host; see Fig. 18.

We anticipate that more detailed studies, based on molecular phylogenetic analyses, looking into these and other correlations of intermediate hosts, their regional occurrences and ecological specifics will shed more light on the evolutionary potential of trematode parasites from thiarid snails.

Conclusion and outlook

To date, studies on freshwater snails and their interactions with parasitic trematodes are under-represented worldwide (Adema et al. 2012). There is an urgent need for collaboration bringing together deeper understanding on the basic biology, biodiversity, and evolutionary associations of parasitic trematodes on the one hand and their snail hosts on the other, i.e. those studying parasitology and malacology, taking advantage of their respective expertise in host-parasite interactions and evolutionary systematics.

Accordingly, the aims of this approach presented here were to establish reliable and reproducible data for the morphological identification as well as the methodology for the extraction of high quality DNA from preserved trematode cercariae in specifically known populations of their thiarid snails hosts (including museum samples collected several years ago). It was also the aim to conduct a phylogenetic analysis of the minute intestinal flukes. In addition, the present paper adds to a more in-depth evolutionary systematic analysis with data on reproductive biology, geographical distribution, morphology and molecular phylogenies of T. granifera.

Using this combinational approach, it will eventually be possible to identify in more details the host-parasite relationships of thiarid snails as first intermediate host populations not only in Thailand, and also to determine the role of parasitic infections in these gastropods and as human pathogens.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Research and Development Institute, Silpakorn University, Thailand. We also thank the Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Silpakorn University. We are grateful for financial support from the Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph. D. Program (Grant No. PHD/0093/2556) and the Deutsche Akademische Austauschdienst (DAAD) to Nuanpan Veeravechsukij, Duangduen Krailas and Matthias Glaubrecht. The study was also supported through a collaboration grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) to MG, which is thankfully acknowledged here. Comments from reviewers and the subject editor helped in improving the manuscript of the paper.

References

  • Ali H, Ai L, Song HQ, Ali S, Lin RQ, Seyni B, Lssa G, Zhu XQ (2008) Genetic charaterisation of Fasciola samples from different host species and geographical localities revealed the existence of F. hepatica and F. gigantica in Niger. Parasitology Research 102: 1021–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-007-0870-7
  • Anucherngchai S, Tejangkura T, Chontananarth T (2016) Epidemiological situation and molecular identification of cercarial stage in freshwater snails in Chao-Phraya Basin, Central Thailand. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 6: 539–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2016.01.015
  • Anucherngchai S, Tejangkura T, Chontananarth T (2017) Molecular confirmation of trematodes in the snail intermediate hosts from Ratchaburi Province, Thailand. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease 7: 286–292. https://doi.org/10.12980/apjtd.7.2017D6-399
  • Appleton CC, Forbes AT, Demetriades NT (2009) The occurrence, bionomics and potential impacts of the invasive freshwater snail Tarebia granifera (Lamarck, 1822) (Gastropoda: Thiaridae) in South Africa. Zoologische Mededelingen 83: 525–536.
  • Ayoub M, Tadrosi M, Bardicy SE (2017) Echinochasmus, new species (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae) from Egypt. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology 47: 159–165.
  • Brandt AM (1974) The non-marine aquatic Mollusca of Thailand. Archiv fϋr Molluskenkunde 105: 1–423.
  • Brooks DR, O’Grady RT, Glen DR (1985) Phylogenetic analysis of the Digenea (Platyhelminthes: Cercomeria) with comments on their adaptive radiation. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 411–443. https://doi.org/10.1139/z85-062
  • Chai JY (2009) Echinostomes in humans. In: Fried B, Toledo R (Eds) The Biology of Echinostomes: From the Molecule to the Community.Springer Science + Business Media LLC, New York, 147–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09577-6_7
  • Chai JY, Sohn WM, Yong TS, Eom KS, Min DY, Lee MY, Lim H, Insisiengmay B, Phommasack B, Rim HJ (2013) Centrocestus formosanus (Heterophyidae): human infections and the infection source in Lao PDR. Journal Parasitology 99: 531–536. https://doi.org/10.1645/12-37.1
  • Chaniotis BN, Butler JM, Ferguson FF, Jobin WR (1980) Bionomics of Tarebia granifera (Gastropoda: Thiaridae) in Puerto Rico, an Asian vector of Paragonimiasis westermani. Caribbean Journal of Science 16: 81–89.
  • Chontananarth T, Wongsawad C (2013) Epidemiology of cercarial stage of trematodes in freshwater snails from Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 3: 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60058-1
  • Chuboon S, Wongsawad C, Ruamsuk A, Nithikathkul C (2005) Survival of Haplorchis taichui metacercariae in Lab-pla, Thai traditional food preparation. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 36 (Supplement 4): 110–111.
  • Chung OS, Lee HJ, Kim YM, Sohn WM, Kwak SJ, Seo M (2011) First report of human infection with Gynaecotyla squatarolae and first Korean record of Haplorchis pumilio in a patient. International Journal for Parasitology 60: 227–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2010.11.003
  • Davies D, Davies C, Lauthier JJ, Hamann M, Ostrowski de Núñez M (2015) Morphological and ITS2 molecular characterization of Ribeiroia cercariae (Digenea: Psilostomidae) from Biomphalaria spp. (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) in Northern Argentina. Journal of Parasitology 101: 549–555. https://doi.org/10.1645/13-350.1
  • Dechruksa W, Krailas D, Glaubrecht M (2013) Evaluating the status and identity of “Melaniajugicostis Hanley & Theobald, 1876 – an enigmatic thiarid gastropod in Thailand (Caenogastropoda, Cerithioidea). Zoosystematics and Evolution 89(2): 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoos.201300015
  • Dechruksa W, Glaubrecht M, Krailas D (2017) Natural trematode infections of freshwater snail Melanoides jugicostis Hanley & Theobald, 1876 (Family Thiaridae), the first intermediate host of animal and human parasites in Thailand. Silpakorn University Science and Technology Journal 11: 9–16.
  • Dechruksa W, Krailas D, Ukong S, Inkapatanakul W, Dangprasert T (2007) Trematode infections of freshwater snails family Thiaridae in Khek River. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 38: 1016–1028.
  • Derraik JGB (2008) The potential significance to human health associated with the establishment of the snail Melanoides tuberculata in New Zealand. The New Zealand Medical Journal 121: 25–32.
  • Dzikowski R, Levy MG, Poore MF, Flowers JR, Paperna L (2004) Use of rDNA polymorphism for identification of Heterophyidae infecting freshwater fishes. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 59: 35–41. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao059035
  • Esteban JG, Antoli CM (2009) Echinostomes: Systematics and life cycle. In: Fried B, Toledo R (Eds) The Biology of Echinostomes: From the Molecule to the Community.Springer Science + Business Media LLC, New York, 1–34.
  • Facon BT, David P (2006) Metapopulation dynamics and biological invasions: a spatially explicit model applied to a freshwater snail. The American Naturalist 168: 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1086/508669
  • Fernández LD, Casalis AE, Masa AM, Perez MV (1992) Estudio preliminar de la variación de Tarebia granifera (Lamarck), Río Hatibonico, Camagüey. Revista Cubana de Medicina Tropical 44: 66–70.
  • Frandsen F, Christensen NQ (1984) An introductory guide to the identification of cercariae from African freshwater snails with special reference to cercariae of trematode species of medical and veterinary importance. Acta Tropica 41: 181–202.
  • Galaktionov KV, Dobrovolskij AA (2003) The biology and evolution of trematodes: an essay on the biology, morphology, life cycles, transmissions, and evolution of digenetic trematodes. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, 592 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3247-5
  • Glaubrecht M (1996) Evolutionsökologie und Systematik am Beispiel von Süβ- und Brackwasserschnecken (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda: Cerithioidea): Ontogenese-Strategien, paläontologische Befunde und Historische Zoogeographie. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 499 pp. [25 pls]
  • Glaubrecht M (1999) Systematics and the evolution of viviparity in tropical freshwater gastropods (Cerithioidea: Thiaridae sensu lato) – an overview. Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg 215: 91–96.
  • Glaubrecht M (2009) On “Darwinian Mysteries” or molluscs as models in evolutionary biology: from local speciation to global radiation. American Malacological Bulletin 27: 3–23. https://doi.org/10.4003/006.027.0202
  • Glaubrecht M (2011) Towards solving Darwin’s “mystery”: Speciation and radiation in lacustrine and riverine freshwater gastropods. American Malacological Bulletin 29: 187–216. https://doi.org/10.4003/006.029.0211
  • Glaubrecht M, Brinkmann N, Pöppe J (2009) Diversity and disparity ‘down under’: Systematics, biogeography and reproductive modes of the ‘marsupial’ freshwater Thiaridae (Caenogastropoda, Cerithioidea) in Australia. Zoosystematics and Evolution 85: 199–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoos.200900004
  • Gutierrez A, Perera G, Yong M, Fernandez JA (1997) Relationships of the prosobranch snails Pomacea paludosa, Tarebia granifera and Melanoides tuberculata with the abiotic environment and freshwater snail diversity in the central region of Cuba. Malacologial Review 30: 39–44.
  • Heneberg P, Rojas A, Bizos J, Kockova L, Mala M, Rojas D (2014) Focal Philophthalmus gralli infection possibly persists in Melanoides tuberculata over two years following the definitive hosts’ removal. Parasitology International 63: 802–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2014.07.012
  • Hyslop EJ (2003) Additions to the freshwater malacofauna of Jamaica. Revista de Biologȋa Tropical 51: 262–263.
  • Ito J (1980) Studies on cercariae in Japan. Shizuoka University, Oya, Surugaku, Shizuoka, 376 pp.
  • Kalatan AMN, Arfin M, Al-Arefi HA, Bobshait HI, Hamadah SA, Al-Thawab FH, Al-Shamrani AA (1997) Occurrence of larval Philophthalmus gralli (Mathis & Leger, 1910) in freshwater snail Melanoides tuberculatus (Muller) from Al-Hafuf, Saudi Arabia and its development into adult in various experimental hosts. Parasitology International 46: 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5769(97)00019-6
  • Katokhin AV, Shekhovtsov SV, Konkow S, Yurlova NI, Serbina EA, Vodianitskai SN, Fedorov KP, Loktev VB, Muratov IV, Ohyama F, Makhnev TV, Pel’tek SE, Mordvinov VA (2008) Assessment of the genetic distinctions of Opisthorchis felineus from O. viverrini and Clonorchis sinensis by ITS2 and CO1 sequences. Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics 421: 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1607672908040133
  • Kaw BL (1945) On the present status of the genus Loxogenes. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Siences. Section B.
  • Krailas D, Chotesaengsri S, Pattaradussadee N, Notesiri N, Dechruksa W (2008) Bucephalid (Gasterostome) cercariae obtained from freshwater clams in Thailand. The Journal of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 31: 70–76.
  • Krailas D, Dechruksa W, Ukong S, Janecharut T (2003) Cercarial infection in Paludomus petrosus, Freshwater snail in Pa La-U Waterfall. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 34: 286–290.
  • Krailas D, Namchote S, Rattanathai P (2011) Human intestinal flukes Haplorchis taichui and Haplorchis pumilio in their intermediate hosts, freshwater snails of the families Thiaridae and Pachychilidae, in southern Thailand. Zoosystematics and Evolution 87(2): 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoos.201100012
  • Krailas D, Namchote S, Koonchornboon T, Dechruksa W, Boonmekarm D (2014) Trematodes obtained from the thiarid freshwater snail Melanoides tuberculata (Müller, 1774) as vector of human infections in Thailand. Zoosystematics and Evolution 90: 57–86. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.90.7306
  • Krailas D, Veeravechsukij N, Chuanprasit C, Boonmekam D, Namchote S (2016) Prevalence of fish-borne trematodes of the family Heterophyidae at Pasak Cholasid Reservoir, Thailand. Acta Tropica 156: 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.01.007
  • Kudlai O, Stunzenas V, Tkach V (2015) The taxonomic identity and phylogenetic relationships of Cercaria pugnax and C. helvetica XII (Digenea: Lecithodendriidae) based on morphological and molecular data. Folia Parasitologica 62: 2–7. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2015.003
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33: 1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
  • Kumchoo K, Wongsawad C, Chai JY, Vanittanakom P, Rojanapaibul A (2005) High prevalence of Haplorchis taichui metacercariae in cyprinoid fish from Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine Public Health 36: 451–455.
  • Lamarck JBPA de Monet de (1816) Tableau encyclopédique et méthodique des trois règnes de la nature. 33 partie, Mollusques et polypes divers. Paris, Agasse. 2, 16, 98 pp.
  • Le TH, Nguyen KT, Nguyen NT, Doan HT, Dung DT, Blair D (2017) The ribosomal transcription units of Haplorchis pumilio and H. taichui and the use of 28S rDNA sequences for phylogenetic identification of common heterophyids in Vietnam. Parasites Vectors 10: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-1968-0
  • Lord JS, Parker S, Parker F, Brooks DR (2012) Gastrointestinal helminths of pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus pipistrellus/Pipistrellus pygmaeus) (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) of England. Parasitology 139: 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182011002046
  • Lydeard C, Holznagel WE, Glaubrecht M, Ponder WF (2002) Molecular phylogeny of a circum-global, diverse gastropod superfamily (Cerithioidea: Mollusca: Caenogastropoda): pushing the deepest phylogenetic limits of mitochondrial LSU rDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 22: 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2001.1072
  • Malek EA, Cheng TC (1974) Medical and Economic malacology. Academic Press, New York, 398 pp.
  • Mei X-F, Li S-Q, Hu C-H, Huang T-F, Chen Z-F, Huang W-Y (2015) ITS2 Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of Haplorchis pumilio and H. taichui. China Animal Husbandry & Vetinary Medicine 42: 1943–1949.
  • Miranda NAF, Perissinotto R, Appleton CC (2010) Salinity and temperature tolerance of the invasive freshwater gastropod Tarebia granifera. South African Journal of Science 106: 156. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v106i3/4.156
  • Miranda NAF, Perissinotto R, Appleton CC (2011) Population structure of an invasive parthenogenetic gastropod in coastal lakes and estuaries of northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. PLoS ONE 6: e24337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024337
  • Miranda NAF, Perissinotto R (2012) Stable isotope evidence for dietary overlap between alien and native gastropods in coastal lakes of northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. PLoS ONE 7: e31897. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031897
  • Mukaratirwa S, Hove T, Cindzi ZM, Maononga DB, Taruvinga M, Matenga E (2005) First report of an outbreak of the oriental eyefluke Philophthalmus gralli (Mathis & Ledger, 1910), in commercially reared ostriches (Struthio camelus) in Zimbabwe. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 72: 203–206. https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v72i3.197
  • Nithikathkul C, Wongsawad C (2008) Prevalence of Haplorchis taichui and Haplorchoides sp. metacercariae in freshwater fish from water reservoirs, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Korean Journal Parasitology 46: 109–112. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2008.46.2.109
  • Nithiuthai S, Suwansaksri J, Wiwanitkit V, Chaengphukeaw P (2002) A survey of metacercariae in cyprinoid fish in Nakhon Ratchasima, northeast Thailand. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 33: 103–105.
  • Nollen PM, Murray HD (1978) Philophthalmus gralli: Identification, growth characteristics, and treatment of an Oriental eyefluke of Birds introduced into the continental United States. Journal of Parasitology 64: 178–180. https://doi.org/10.2307/3279646
  • Odhner T (1910) Nordostafrikanische Trematoden, grösstenteils vom Weissen Nil (von der schwedischen zoologischen Expedition gesammelt). Results of the Swedish Zoological Expedition to Egypt and the White Nile 4: 1–166.
  • Parvathi A, Umesha KR, Kumar S, Sithithaworn P, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I (2008) Development and evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the detection of Opisthorchis viverrini in fish. Acta Tropica 107: 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.04.001
  • Pinto HA, de Melo AL (2010) Melanoides tuberculata (Mollusca: Thiaridae) as an intermediate host of Centrocestus formosanus (Trematoda: Heterophyidae) in Brazil. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo 52: 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652010000400008
  • Pointier JP, Jourdane J (2000) Biological control of the snail hosts of schistosomiasis in areas of low transmission: the example of the Caribbean area. Acta Tropica 77: 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-706X(00)00123-6
  • Pointier JP, Samadi S, Jarne P, Delay B (1998) Introduction and spread of Thiara granifera (Lamarck, 1822) in Martinique, French West Indies. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 1277–1290. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008887531605
  • Prasad PK, Goswami LM, Tandon V, Chatterjee A (2011) PCR-based molecular characterization and in silico analysis of food-borne trematode parasites Paragonimuswestermani, Fasciolopsis buski and Fasciola gigantica from Northeast India using ITS2 rDNA. Bioinformation 6: 64–68. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630006064
  • Prentice MA (1983) Displacement of Biomphalaria glabrata by the snail Thiara granifera in field habitats in St. Lucia, West Indies. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 77: 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00034983.1983.11811672
  • Pungpak S, Radomyos P, Radomyos B, Schelp FP, Jongsuksuntigul P, Bunnag D (1998) Treatment of Opisthorchis viverrini and intestinal fluke infections with praziquentel. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 29: 246–249.
  • Radomyos B, Wongsaroj T, Wilairatana P, Radomyos P, Praevanich R, Meesomboon V, Jongsuksuntikul P (1998) Opisthorchiasis and intestinal fluke infections in northern Thailand. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 29: 123–127.
  • Sato M, Thaenkham U, Dekumyoy P, Waikagul J (2009) Discrimination of Opisthorchis viverrini, Clonorchis sinensis, Haplorchis pumilio and Haplorchis taichui using nuclear DNA-based PCR targeting ribosomal DNA ITS regions. Acta Tropica 109: 81–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.09.015
  • Schell SC (1970) How to know the trematodes. WC Brown Co., Dubuque, 355 pp.
  • Skov J, Kania PW, Dalsgaard A, Jørgensen TR, Buchmann K (2009) Life cycle stages of heterophyid trematode in Vietnamese freshwater fishes traced by molecular and morphometric methods. Veterinary Parasitology 160: 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.088
  • Sohn WM, Yong TS, Eom KS, Min DY, Lee D, Jung BK, Banouvong V, Insisiengmay B, Phoommasack B, Rim HJ, Chai JK (2014) Prevalence of Haplorchis taichui among humans and fish in Luang Prabang Province, Lao PDR. Acta Tropica 136: 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.04.020
  • Sri-aroon P, Lohachit C, Harada M (2005) Brackish-water mollusks of Surat Thani province, Southern Thailand. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 36 (Supplement 4): 180–188.
  • Sripa B, Kaewkes S, Intapan PM, Maleewong W, Brindley PJ (2010) Food-borne trematodiases in Southeast Asia: epidemiology, pathology, clinical manifestation and control. Advances in Parasitology 72: 305–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-308X(10)72011-X
  • Srisawangwong T, Sithithaworn P, Tesana S (1997) Metacercariae isolated from cyprinoid fishes in Khon Kaen district by digestion technic. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 28 (Supplement 1): 224–226.
  • Strong EE, Colgan DJ, Healy JM, Lydeard C, Ponder WF, Glaubrecht M (2011) Phylogeny of the gastropod superfamily Cerithioidea using morphology and molecules. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 162: 43–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2010.00670.x
  • Sukontason K, Piangjai S, Muangyimpong Y, Sukontason K, Methanitikorn R, Chaithong U (1999) Prevalence of trematode metacercariae in cyprinoid fish of Ban Pao district, Chiang Mai Province, northern Thailand. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 30: 365–370.
  • Sukontason K, Unpunyo P, Sukontason KL, Piangjai S (2005) Evidence of Haplorchis taichui infection as pathogenic parasite: Three case reports. Scandinavian Journal of Infection Diseases 37: 388–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365540510034473
  • Torgerson PR et al. (2015) World Health Organization estimates of the global and regional disease burden of 11 foodborne parasitic diseases, 2010: a data synthesis. PLoS Medicine 12(12): e1001920. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001920
  • Ukong S, Krailas D, Dangprasert T, Channgarm P (2007) Studies on the morphology of cercariae obtained from freshwater snails at Erawan Waterfall, Erawan National Park, Thailand. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 38: 302–312.
  • Upatham ES, Kruatrachue M, Chitramwong Y, Jantataemae S (1995) Malacology. Suksopa Publishing, Bangkok, 517 pp.
  • Upatham ES, Sornmai S, Thirachantra S, Sitaputra P (1980) Field studies on the bionomics of alpha and gamma races of Tricula aperta in the Mekong River at Khemmarat, Ubol Ratchathani Province, Thailand. In: Bruce JI, Sornmani S, Asch HL, Crawford KA (Eds) The Mekong schistosome.Malacological Review 1980 (Supplement 2), 239–261.
  • Vargas M, Gomez J, Perera G (1991) Geographic expansion of Marisa cornuarietis and Tarebia granifera in the Dominican Replublic. Journal of Medical and Applied Malacology 3: 69–72.
  • Veeravechsukij B, Krailas D, Namchote S, Wiggering B, Neiber MT, Glaubrecht M (2018) Phylogeography and reproductive biology of the freshwater snail Tarebia granifera in Thailand and Timor (Cerithioidea, Thiaridae): morphological disparity versus genetic diversity. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2). https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.28981
  • Waikagul J, Dekumyoy P, Yoonuan T, Praevanit R (2006) Conjunctiva philophthalmosis: A case report in Thailand. The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 74: 848–849. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.848
  • Waikagul J, Thaekham U (2014) Approaches to research on the systematics of fish-borne trematodes (1st edn). Academic Press, Cambridge, 130 pp.
  • Watson JM (1960) Medical Helminthology. Bailliere Tindall & Cox, London, 487 pp.
  • Watthanakulpanich D, Waikagul J, Maipanich W, Nuamtanong S, Sanguankiat S, Pubampen S, Praevanit R, Mongkhonmu S, Nawa Y (2010) Haplorchis taichui as a possible etiologic agent of irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms. Korean Journal of Parasitology 48: 225–229. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2010.48.3.225
  • Wongratanacheewin S, Pumidonming W, Sermswan RW, Maleewong W (2001) Development of a PCR-based method for the detection of Opisthorchis viverrini in experimentally infected hamsters. Parasitology 122: 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182001007235
  • Yamaguti S (1975) A synoptical review of life histories of digenetic trematodes of vertebrates. Keigaku Publishing Co., Tokyo, 590 pp. [219 pls]
login to comment