Research Article |
Corresponding author: Wilson J. E. M. Costa ( wcosta@acd.ufrj.br ) Academic editor: Peter Bartsch
© 2017 Wilson J. E. M. Costa.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Costa WJEM (2017) Description of two endangered new seasonal killifish species of the genus Cynolebias from the São Francisco River basin, Brazilian Caatinga (Cyprinodontiformes, Aplocheilidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 93(2): 333-341. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.93.20906
|
Two new species of Cynolebias are described from temporary pools of the Verde Grande River drainage, São Francisco basin, in the semiarid Caatinga, a phytogeographical province of northeastern Brazil. Cynolebias elegans sp. n., a member of the C. gilbertoi group, is considered as the smallest species of the genus, reaching about 38 mm of standard length; it is distinguished from all other species of the group by the long unpaired fins, relative position of anal fin and vertebrae, and morphometric data. Cynolebias gorutuba sp. n. belongs to the Cynolebias zeta-clade, a group of large species supposedly feeding on smaller sympatric seasonal killifishes; it differs from other species of the group by the female colour pattern, relative position of dorsal fin and vertebrae, and cephalic neuromast pattern. Both species herein described were not found in recent collecting trips, after their habitats had been drastically modified, and are also possibly highly endangered if not already extinct. Field data relative to gradual habitat decline in the type locality region of C. elegans indicate that after pools lose the dense vegetation that provides shelter to small species, these species such as C. elegans become exposed to larger sympatric predatory species and are extirpated. These data support the hypothesis that small seasonal killifish species specialised in living within marginal shaded areas of temporary pools are more susceptible to environmental changes than other congeners.
Biodiversity, conservation, systematics, taxonomy, trophic specialisations
A great diversity of killifishes that only inhabit temporary pools formed during rainy seasons has been reported for the Caatinga, the semiarid phytogeographical province of northeastern Brazil (e.g.,
Two genera of seasonal killifishes occur in the Caatinga, Cynolebias Steindachner, 1876 and Hypsolebias Costa, 2006. Diversification of these genera has been estimated to have started during the Miocene, after the climate became drier (
All species of Cynolebias, except C. porosus Steindachner, 1876, were described after 1990 as a result of frequent recent efforts to sample the temporary pools of the Brazilian seasonal dry forests (e.g.,
Specimens were captured with small dip nets and fixed in formalin for a period of 10 days, and then transferred to 70 % ethanol. Collections were made with permits provided by ICMBio (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade). Material is deposited in Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (
Holotype.
Cynolebias elegans is similar to other species of the C. gilbertoi group (C. gilbertoi Costa, 1998 and C. ochraceus Costa, 2014) and distinguished from all other congeners of the subgenus Cynolebias, by the following character states: numerous vomerine teeth (9–16 vs. 1–4, when teeth are present), 7–8 gill-rakers on the ventral part of the first branchial arch (vs. 9–12), highest body depth at vertical just anterior to pelvic-fin base (vs. through pectoral-fin base), and presence of light dots on flank arranged in vertical groups (vs. light dots when present not arranged in vertical groups). Cynolebias elegans differs from C. gilbertoi and C. ochraceus by having long dorsal and anal fins in males, their extremities excluding filaments posteriorly reaching caudal-fin base (vs. reaching caudal peduncle), greater pre-pelvic length in males (52.2–53.9 % SL, vs. 48.5–49.9 % SL in C. gilbertoi and 48.9–50.5 % SL in C. ochraceus), and first proximal radial of the anal fin between neural spines of 9th and 10th vertebrae in males, and between neural spines of 11th and 12th vertebrae in females (vs. between neural spines of 11th and 13th vertebrae in males, and between neural spines of 12th and 14th vertebrae in females). Cynolebias elegans is also distinguished from C. gilbertoi by having larger head (31.3–34.2 % SL in males, 32.1–33.4 % in females, vs. 27.9–30.3 % SL in males, 29.0–31.1 % in females) and smaller eye (25.5–29.1 % of head length in males, 27.3–29.9 % in females, vs. 30.0–31.0 % of head length in males, 31.5–34.2 % in females); and from C. ochraceus by having fewer vertebrae (31–32 vs. 33–34), more slender body (body depth 32.5–34.5 % SL, vs. 35.0–37.8 % SL), and flank light purplish brown in males (vs. light yellow ochre). The largest specimen examined was 37.9 mm SL, suggesting that C. elegans is the smallest species of the genus.
Morphometric data appear in Table
Dorsal and anal fins relatively long and pointed in males, posteriorly reaching caudal-fin base when excluding filaments, rounded in females; in males, short filamentous rays on dorsal-fin extremity, long filamentous rays on anal-fin extremity, posteriorly reaching middle portion of caudal fin; no filamentous rays in females. Caudal fin rounded. Pectoral fin rounded, posterior margin reaching vertical between base of 5th and 6th anal-fin rays in males, reaching base of 3rd anal-fin ray in females. Pelvic fin small, tip reaching between base of 3rd and 4th anal-fin rays in males, reaching base of 2nd anal-fin ray in females; pelvic-fin bases medially separated by short interspace. Dorsal-fin origin at vertical between base of 3rd and 5th anal-fin rays in males, through base of 3rd anal-fin ray in females. Dorsal-fin rays 17–18 in males, 16–17 in females; anal-fin rays 18–20 in males, 18–19 in females; caudal-fin rays 28–29; pectoral-fin rays 12; pelvic-fin rays 6. In males, papillate contact organs on inner surface of three or four dorsal-most pectoral-fin rays. Second proximal radial of dorsal fin between neural spines of 12th and 13th vertebrae in males, between neural spines of 13th and 14th vertebrae in females; first proximal radial of anal fin between pleural ribs of 9th and 10th vertebrae in males, between pleural ribs of 11th and 12th vertebrae in females; total vertebrae 31–32.
Scales small, cycloid. Body and head entirely scaled, except anterior ventral surface of head. Body squamation extending over anterior 25 % of caudal-fin base; no scales on dorsal, anal and pectoral-fin bases. Scales irregularly arranged on frontal region and trunk. Longitudinal series of scales 34–36; transverse series of scales 13–14; scale rows around caudal peduncle 22. No contact organs on scales. Cephalic neuromasts: supraorbital 25–30; parietal 4; anterior rostral 2, posterior rostral 2; infraorbital 5 + 31–33; preorbital 3–4; otic 5, post-otic 7–8; supratemporal 2–3; median opercular 1–3, ventral opercular 5–8; pre-opercular plus mandibular 45–47; lateral mandibular 3–4 + 8–9, paramandibular 1.
Males. Flank light purplish brown, with 10 or 11 lighter pale golden brown bars and minute white dots arranged in vertical zones. Dorsum pale purplish brown, venter white. Head pale purplish brown, with dark grey dots on otic, post-otic and supra-temporal neuromasts; golden iridescence on opercular region. Iris yellow, with dark brown bar through orbit centre. Dorsal and caudal fin light grey, with white dots. Anal fin pale pink, basal portion with white dots; filaments pale pink. Pelvic fin pale pink. Pectoral fin hyaline.
Females. Flank light purplish brown, with 11 or 12 pale golden brown bars; 1–2 black spots on centre of flank. Dorsum pale purplish brown, venter white. Head pale purplish brown, with dark grey dots on otic, post-otic and supra-temporal neuromasts; pale golden iridescence on opercular region. Iris yellow, with dark brown bar through orbit centre. Fins hyaline.
Similar to colouration in life, dark marks still distinct, but paler ; white dots on trunk and fins and pink pigmentation on anal and pelvic fins of males, and golden iridescence on opercular region of both sexes inconspicuous.
Cynolebias elegans is known from a single locality, a temporary pool in the Verde Grande River drainage, Bahia, Brazil (14o33’39” S 42o42’10” W, altitude about 630 m asl). This pool was first explored in January 2002, when the only species found was Hypsolebias mediopapillatus (Costa, 2006). At that time, the pool was densely covered by aquatic vegetation and marginal spiny bushes, making it difficult to access the pool, except in its portion closer to the road. During a second visit, January 2005, cattle were introduced in the area and original vegetation was substituted by grass. Both C. oticus and H. mediopapillatus were abundant, but only six specimens of C. elegans (the type series) and one of Hypsolebias fulminantis (Costa & Brasil, 1993) were collected. In several other pools found along the road, many specimens of C. oticus, C. leptocephalus and H. mediopapillatus were found, but both C. elegans and H. fulminantis were absent. The type locality and neighbouring pools were sampled again in May 2009 and January 2010, but no specimen of C. elegans was found. New visits occurred in January and May 2017, but the type locality was now highly modified into a permanent pool containing only small not identified Characiformes. These field records indicate that C. elegans is a rare, critically endangered species, if not already extinct.
From the Latin elegans (elegant, fine), an allusion to the distinctive general appearance of the new species, with males combing relatively slender body with long unpaired fins.
Holotype | Paratypes | ||
---|---|---|---|
male | males (3) | females (2) | |
Standard length (mm) | 36.1 | 36.8–37.9 | 35.1–36.9 |
Percent of standard length | |||
Body depth | 34.0 | 32.5–34.5 | 33.0–33.1 |
Caudal peduncle depth | 15.1 | 14.2–15.7 | 14.3–15.4 |
Pre-dorsal length | 59.3 | 56.7–59.5 | 63.0–63.3 |
Pre-pelvic length | 53.9 | 52.2–54.2 | 54.9–55.4 |
Length of dorsal-fin base | 31.3 | 29.2–32.8 | 25.8–27.5 |
Length of anal-fin base | 35.5 | 32.2–35.3 | 26.3–27.3 |
Caudal-fin length | 39.0 | 34.9–38.8 | 33.6–37.9 |
Pectoral-fin length | 32.3 | 28.3–30.9 | 28.2–29.4 |
Pelvic-fin length | 9.8 | 8.3–10.1 | 9.6–10.2 |
Head length | 34.2 | 31.3–32.9 | 32.1–33.4 |
Percent of head length | |||
Head depth | 93.5 | 94.4–98.2 | 91.9–97.6 |
Head width | 74.1 | 71.6–78.1 | 75.0–75.6 |
Snout length | 14.5 | 14.0–15.5 | 13.9–14.5 |
Lower jaw length | 20.7 | 19.5–22.6 | 19.2–19.4 |
Eye diameter | 26.6 | 25.5–29.1 | 27.3–29.9 |
Cynolebias gorutuba is similar to other species of CZC (C. altus Costa, 2001, C. attenuatus Costa, 2001, C. gibbus Costa, 2001, C. leptocephalus Costa & Brasil, 1993, C. parietalis Costa, 2014, C. perforatus Costa & Brasil, 1991, C. oticus Costa, 2014), and distinguished from all other congeners, by the following character states: contact organs distributed on the inner surface of entire pectoral fin of males (vs. restricted to the dorsal portion of the fin), trunk scales extending over dorsal-fin base (vs. not extending), scales extending over one third or more of caudal-fin base (vs. about one fourth), and gill-rakers of first branchial arch bowed and with numerous denticles on its surface (vs. straight to slightly curved, usually without denticles, or one or two when present). Cynolebias gorutuba is distinguished from all other species of CZC by the presence of small round dark grey spots on dorsolateral portion of the trunk in females (vs. absence) and by the second proximal radial of dorsal fin between neural spines of 16th and 18th vertebrae in males (vs. between neural spines of 14th and 16th vertebrae); it is also distinguished from all other species of the Cynolebias zeta-clade, except C. oticus, by having more preopercular neuromasts (75–87 vs. 53–72). Cynolebias gorutuba also differs from C. oticus by having the anterior lateral profile of the body convex (vs. without a concavity on the head), otic and post-otic neuromast series separated (vs. united), more vertebrae (37–38 vs. 35–36), and absence of bars on the flank in males above 75 mm SL (vs. presence), and from C. parietalis and C. perforatus by fewer caudal-fin rays (30–31 vs. 33–35).
Morphometric data appear in Table
Dorsal and anal fins short, pointed, and with short filamentous rays in males, rounded and without filaments in females. Caudal fin rounded. Pectoral fin rounded, posterior margin reaching vertical urogenital papilla in males, through anus in females. Pelvic fin small, tip reaching base of 1st anal-fin ray; pelvic-fin bases medially separated by short interspace. Dorsal-fin origin at vertical through base of 6th anal-fin ray. Dorsal-fin rays 18–19 in males, 16–17 in females; anal-fin rays 21 in males, 20 in females; caudal-fin rays 30–31; pectoral-fin rays 14–15; pelvic-fin rays 6. In males, papillate contact organs on whole inner surface of pectoral fin. Second proximal radial of dorsal fin between neural spines of 16th and 18th vertebrae, first proximal radial of anal fin between pleural ribs of 14th and 15th vertebrae; total vertebrae 37–38.
Scales small, cycloid. Body and head entirely scaled, except anterior ventral surface of head. Body squamation extending over anterior third of caudal-fin base; few scales extending over middle portion of dorsal and anal fins; pectoral-fin fin base scaled. Scales irregularly arranged on frontal region and trunk. Longitudinal series of scales 38–41; transverse series of scales 16; scale rows around caudal peduncle 24. No contact organs on scales. Cephalic neuromasts: supraorbital 42–48; parietal 5–7; anterior rostral 3, posterior rostral 4; infraorbital 6 + 40–48; preorbital 3; otic 11–12, post-otic 9–12; supratemporal 3–5; median opercular 2, ventral opercular 4; preopercular plus mandibular 75–87; lateral mandibular 12–21, paramandibular 1.
Holotype | Paratypes | ||
---|---|---|---|
male | males (2) | females (2) | |
Standard length (mm) | 88.8 | 50.7–83.9 | 42.0–50.1 |
Percent of standard length | |||
Body depth | 33.1 | 30.0–31.3 | 27.8–29.4 |
Caudal peduncle depth | 14.2 | 12.5–14.1 | 12.5–13.0 |
Pre-dorsal length | 60.0 | 61.3–65.0 | 63.7–67.5 |
Pre-pelvic length | 48.6 | 52.2–53.4 | 52.4–55.2 |
Length of dorsal-fin base | 27.1 | 23.6–24.9 | 19.8–21.2 |
Length of anal-fin base | 34.3 | 27.3–27.9 | 23.9–24.2 |
Caudal-fin length | 30.0 | 29.2–30.8 | 30.0–30.8 |
Pectoral-fin length | – | 22.6–23.0 | 23.4–23.5 |
Pelvic-fin length | 8.0 | 7.3–7.6 | 7.8–8.4 |
Head length | 32.3 | 32.0–33.7 | 33.8–34.2 |
Percent of head length | |||
Head depth | 96.0 | 82.0–92.4 | 81.9–82.7 |
Head width | 67.3 | 64.5–67.7 | 65.1–69.9 |
Snout length | 13.9 | 14.0–15.4 | 13.3–14.5 |
Lower jaw length | 30.0 | 25.8–28.9 | 23.1–26.5 |
Eye diameter | 19.3 | 18.1–22.6 | 23.2–25.9 |
Males. Flank and dorsum pale silver, scale margins pale yellow in larger fish, flank pale brown in smaller; three or four pale grey humeral spots. Venter white. Dorsal portion of head pale yellow to pale brown, with reddish brown dots on otic, post-otic and supra-temporal neuromasts; infraorbital and opercular regions pale silver with pale blue and pale golden iridescence. Jaws white. Iris yellow, with dark reddish brown bar through orbit centre. Dorsal and caudal fins light grey, basal portion pale yellow; white dots on whole dorsal fin and dorsal part or most caudal fin. Anal fin light grey, basal portion pale yellow with white dots, filaments black. Pelvic fin pale yellow. Pectoral fin hyaline.
Females. Flank pale brown, with 11 or 12 pale almost inconspicuous grey bars; 2–4 dark brownish grey spots on humeral region and 4–6 dark grey round spots on dorsolateral portion of trunk. Dorsum pale brown, venter white. Head pale brown, with dark grey dots on otic, post-otic and supra-temporal neuromasts; pale golden iridescence on opercular region. Iris yellow, with dark brown bar through orbit centre. Fins hyaline.
Similar to colouration in life, dark marks still distinct, but paler; white dots on fins of males and golden iridescence on opercular region of both sexes inconspicuous.
Cynolebias gorutuba is only known from pools in the floodplains of the Gorutuba River, within the town of Janaúba, Minas Gerais, Brazil. This area was first sampled in January 2002, in a vast undisturbed temporary pool with dense aquatic vegetation (15o48’06”S, 43o19’14”W, altitude about 525 m asl), when the single species found was Hypsolebias janaubensis (Costa, 2006). In January 2005, the area was visited again, but the whole original pool sampled three years before had been destroyed after expansion of an adjacent road. In a few remnant, small pools with very turbid water and no aquatic vegetation, 15 exemplars of H. janaubensis and four of C. gorutuba were found. In the third visit, January 2010, pools and typical vegetation had been completely extirped from the area studied before. Searching around this area, some shallow temporary pools were found about 300 m from the former pool (15º47’57”S, 43º19’18”W, altitude about 525 m a.s.l.). This new area, not visible in previous trips by being covered by dense high vegetation, was then open, with scarce grass, and restricted to shallow turbid water pools. A few specimens of H. janaubensis and one of C. gorutuba (the holotype) were found. More recently, the area was visited twice, in January and April 2017. No vestige of pools was found in areas previously studied, but within a dense Caatinga forest not distant from the first collecting site, a large temporary pool was found, with about 100 m2 and about 1 m deep. Hypsolebias janaubensis was common in all parts of the pool, a few exemplars of H. magnificus (Costa & Brasil, 1991) were found in shaded zones, but no specimen of Cynolebias gorutuba was collected. These field studies suggest that C. gorutuba is a rare species, possibly highly threatened with extinction.
The name gorutuba refers to the Gorutuba River floodplains, the type locality of C. gorutuba. The origin and original meaning of the name is uncertain; local people associate this name to a frog popular name, which needs confirmation.
In a classical paper,
This recently known fauna of seasonal killifishes endemic to the Caatinga exhibits diversified morphological patterns and uncommon specialisations (e.g.,
There is no available data on feeding habits of CZC species. However, field observations highly suggest that they prey on species of the Hypsolebias magnificus group (e.g., H. fulminantis, H. harmonicus, H. magnificus, H. picturatus,) which are small, usually not surpassing 40 mm SL (e.g.,
Species of the C. gilbertoi group share, among other character states, numerous vomerine teeth, a condition unique among Cynolebiini killifishes (e.g.,
I am especially grateful to Claudia Bove and Bruno Costa for accompanying me on most collecting trips. Thanks are also due to Anaïs Barbosa, Axel Katz, and José Leonardo Mattos for help on collecting trips, and to A. Katz for taking a photograph of the paratype of C. gorutuba. This paper benefited from suggestions provided by P. Bartsch, D. Taphorn and F. Ottoni. This study was supported by CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Ministério de Ciência e Tecnologia) and FAPERJ (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro).