Research Article
Print
Research Article
Mitogenomic analysis reveals two cryptic lineages and provides insights into the historical biogeography of the genus Pseudohynobius (Caudata, Hynobiidae)
expand article infoTao Luo§|, Zi-Fa Zhao§, Zhong-Lian Wang§, Ming-Yuan Xiao§, Ning Xiao, Huai-Qing Deng§, Jiang Zhou§
‡ Yunnan University, Kunming, China
§ Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China
| Southwest United Graduate School, Kunming, China
¶ Guiyang Healthcare Vocational University, Guiyang, China
Open Access

Abstract

The genus Pseudohynobius exhibits a west-to-east distribution across southwestern China, spanning diverse mountain ranges and elevations. However, knowledge regarding the diversity, phylogeny, and evolutionary history of this genus remains limited. In this study, based on the concept of phylogenetic species, we identified eight phylogenetic species, including two cryptic lineages. Divergence time estimation revealed that Pseudohynobius originated approximately 14.57 million years ago (Ma), with interspecific divergence mainly occurring between 8.0 and 1.4 Ma. Biogeographic analysis indicated that its most recent common ancestor likely inhabited the Hengduan–Dalou Mountains region in southwestern China around 8.62 Ma and that the Dalou Mountains served as a source of outward dispersal and a key region for speciation between 11 and 4 Ma. The lineage divergence dynamics of this genus are coupled with orogenic movements and paleoclimatic shifts, which may have been the primary drivers of its historical diversification. This study underscores the urgency of conducting further surveys and taxonomic studies to avoid underestimating the diversity of this critically endangered genus.

Key Words

biogeography, conservation, cryptic species, molecular dating, phylogeny, Pseudohynobius

Introduction

The diverse natural landscapes of southern China have fostered exceptionally high species diversity, establishing it as a biodiversity hotspot, with many species being endemic to the region. Despite extensive efforts by taxonomists, the recent discovery of numerous new and cryptic species suggests that biodiversity may still be underestimated (Jiang et al. 2024; Xu et al. 2024). Previous large-scale studies have linked patterns of diversity to orogenic movements and climatic shifts since the Miocene, particularly in fish (Wen et al. 2022; Luo et al. 2024; Luo et al. 2025), amphibians (Che et al. 2010; Luo et al. 2022; Luo et al. 2023), reptiles (Guo et al. 2020), and mammals (Feijó et al. 2022; Wang et al. 2022). However, these studies focus on broad temporal and spatial scales, leaving speciation in small areas poorly understood, especially regarding the role of geographic barriers in speciation.

The Chinese endemic genus Pseudohynobius Fei & Yang, 1983 (Caudata, Hynobiidae) is narrowly and intermittently distributed in the mountainous regions of southern China, including Sichuan, Guizhou, Chongqing, Hubei, and Hunan (Fei et al. 2006; Fei and Ye 2016; AmphibiaChina 2025), providing an ideal model for studying the effects of geographic isolation on speciation. Although the taxonomic placement of the genus remains controversial—specifically whether Pseudohynobius puxiongensis (Fei & Ye, 2000) should be treated as the monotypic genus Protohynobius Fei & Ye, 2000 (Fei and Ye 2000; Fei et al. 2006; Fei and Ye 2016; Jia et al. 2021) or placed within Pseudohynobius as a basal lineage (Peng et al. 2010; Zheng et al. 2011; Yang et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2015)—we follow the latter treatment in accordance with previous studies (AmphibiaChina 2025; Frost 2025). Currently, only six species within this genus have been recorded, inhabiting high-altitude cold pools and surrounding humus-rich environments (Fei and Ye 2016), namely Pseudohynobius flavomaculatus (Hu & Fei, 1978), Pseudohynobius guizhouensis Li, Tian & Gu, 2010, Pseudohynobius jinfo Wei, Xiong & Zeng, 2009, Pseudohynobius kuankuoshuiensis Xu & Zeng, 2007, P. puxiongensis, and Pseudohynobius shuichengensis Tian, Gu, Li, Sun & Li, 1998. Additionally, the conservation status of these species is of considerable concern, as all have been listed in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2024. Except for P. guizhouensis, which is classified as Data Deficient, P. kuankuoshuiensis, P. puxiongensis, and P. shuichengensis are categorized as Critically Endangered, P. jinfo as Endangered, and P. flavomaculatus as Vulnerable (IUCN 2025). The ongoing population declines indicate the urgent need for more stringent conservation measures to ensure the long-term survival of these montane species.

Phylogenetic relationships between the genus Pseudohynobius and other genera of the family Hynobiidae have been resolved, and P. puxiongensis is recognized as the basal clade of the genus (Peng et al. 2010; Pyron and Wiens 2011; Zheng et al. 2011; Yang et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2015; Zhao et al. 2016; Dubois et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2022). Divergence times estimated using 29 nuclear genes show that the genus originated in the middle Miocene, ca. 15.8 million years ago (Ma), with the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) occurring at 6.7 Ma (Chen et al. 2015). However, the times obtained using the mitogenome or cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) are much greater (Zheng et al. 2011; Zhao et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2022). Although significant progress has been made in the phylogeny and taxonomy of this genus, the lack of comprehensive molecular phylogenetic and biogeographical analyses for all species of Pseudohynobius has resulted in a limited understanding of interspecific divergence times and diversification dynamics within the genus. Interestingly, four of the six species are distributed in Guizhou—namely P. guizhouensis, P. jinfo, P. kuankuoshuiensis, and P. shuichengensis (Fig. 1) (Tian et al. 2006; Zeng et al. 2006; Xu et al. 2007; Li et al. 2010; Xia et al. 2012; Li et al. 2020; AmphibiaChina 2025)—suggesting that Guizhou may represent an important region for the diversification of species within the genus.

Figure 1. 

Geographic distribution of the six Pseudohynobius species. Red circles indicate newly collected samples in this study, while gray circles represent localities where the species was observed but no specimens were obtained.

In 2024, we collected a juvenile of the genus Pseudohynobius during a field survey in Xishui County, Guizhou Province, China (Fig. 1). A total of 16 surveys were conducted in the following near two years, none of which found an adult. To determine the phylogenetic position of this sample, we performed mitogenome sequencing. Based on the newly sequenced and published data, we (1) inferred the phylogeny and divergence timing of the genus Pseudohynobius and (2) examined its biogeography and evolutionary dynamics.

Materials and methods

Sampling, DNA extraction, and sequencing

A single juvenile specimen of the genus Pseudohynobius (Fig. 2A, B) was collected in August 2024 from Xishui County, Guizhou Province, China (Fig. 1). The habitat was a pond in a bamboo forest with a large number of subadults; no eggs or adults were found. Over the following near two years, 16 field surveys were conducted, but no additional adults or juveniles were observed. In addition, we also detected the presence of a Pseudohynobius population in the Fanjingshan Mountains, Guizhou Province, China, although no specimen was obtained (Fig. 2C). All experimental procedures strictly adhered to the National Standard Guidelines of the People’s Republic of China (GB/T 35892-2018). Euthanasia was humanely performed using tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222), and the specimen was subsequently preserved in the Animal Ecology Laboratory at Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China.

Figure 2. 

Two cryptic species of the genus Pseudohynobius. A, B. Specimen from Xishui County, Guizhou, China; C. Specimen photographed in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China, by Mr. Xian-Wei Meng, who authorized its use.

To clarify the phylogenetic placement of the juvenile Pseudohynobius specimen collected from Xishui County, Guizhou Province, China, we sequenced its mitochondrial genome. Total genomic DNA was extracted from each sample from 95% ethanol-preserved tissues using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method. Illumina sequencing libraries with 300–500 bp insert fragments were generated for each sample and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 sequencer at TSING KE Biological Technology Co. (Chengdu, China), generating approximately 12 Gb of raw data. The raw data were filtered using fastp v.0.23.4 (Chen 2023) using default parameters, after which the mitogenome was assembled using MitoZ v.3.6 (Meng et al. 2019).

Phylogenetic reconstruction

In this study, we used a total of 24 mitochondrial sequences from the genus Pseudohynobius for phylogenetic analysis, including a newly sequenced mitochondrial genome, as well as five mitochondrial genomes, 15 cytochrome b (Cyt b) sequences, two COI sequences, and two 16S rRNA sequences downloaded from GenBank (Table 1) (Fu et al. 2001; Zeng et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2006; Peng et al. 2010; Xia et al. 2012; Yang et al. 2013; Huang et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2022). We constructed two sequence matrices: dataset 1, which contains only Cyt b and is used for species delimitation and calculation of genetic distances; and dataset 2, which includes complete mitogenomes and concatenated sequences of some species (Cyt b, COI, and 16S rRNA) for assessing divergence times and inferring biogeography. The mitogenome was extracted using PhyloSuite v.1.2.3 (Zhang et al. 2020a) for 13 protein-coding genes, two rRNAs, and 22 tRNAs for subsequent genetic analysis.

Table 1.

Localities, voucher information, and GenBank numbers for all samples used in this study.

ID Species Location (* type localities) Voucher number Mitogenome /Cyt b /COI/16S References
1 Pseudohynobius sp. 1 Xishui County, Guizhou, China XS02 PV018879 This study
2 P. flavomaculatus Lichuan County, Hubei, China CIB-XM2084 NC_020635 Peng et al. 2010
5 P. flavomaculatus Lichuan County, Hubei, China MVZ231151 AY028774 Fu et al. 2001
6 P. flavomaculatus Lichuan County, Hubei, China MVZ231150 AY028773 Fu et al. 2001
4 Pseudohynobius sp. 2 Tianping Mountain, Sangzhi County, Hunan, China CIB-200087 DQ335719 Zeng et al. 2006
7 P. guizhouensis Guiding County, Guizhou, China* GZNU JX867277 Yang et al. 2013; Xia et al. 2012
2007110702 JN165828
JN165944
8 P. guizhouensis Guiding County, Guizhou, China* GZNU JX867273 Yang et al. 2013
2007041501
9 P. guizhouensis Guiding County, Guizhou, China* GZNU JX867274 Yang et al. 2013
2007041502
3 P. jinfo Pengshui County, Chongqing, China NA MT476485 Zhang et al. 2022
10 P. jinfo Jinfo Mountain, Chongqing, China* SWU-AMP NC_026698 Huang et al. 2016
-140715001
11 P. jinfo Jinfo Mountain, Nanchuan County, Chongqing, China* CIB-zyc825 DQ335720 Zeng et al. 2006
12 P. jinfo Jinfo Mountain, Nanchuan County, Chongqing, China* CIB-zyc826 DQ335721 Zeng et al. 2006
13 P. jinfo Baima Mountain, Wulong County, Chongqing, China CIB-bms DQ335724 Zeng et al. 2006
20010715020
14 P. kuankuoshuiensis Suiyang County, Guizhou, China CIB-XM1073 DQ335717 Zeng et al. 2006; Xia et al. 2012
EU586292
JN165945
15 P. kuankuoshuiensis Sujiagou, Suiyang County, Guizhou, China* GZNU JX867278 Yang et al. 2013
2008082201
16 P. kuankuoshuiensis Sujiagou, Suiyang County, Guizhou, China* GZNU JX867275 Yang et al. 2013
2006060801
17 P. shuichengensis Shuicheng County, Guizhou, China* CIB-XM2855 NC_021001 Peng et al. 2010
18 P. shuichengensis Shuicheng County, Guizhou, China* GZNU JX867276 Yang et al. 2013
2007110701
19 P. shuichengensis Shuicheng County, Guizhou, China* CIB-XM1078 DQ335713 Zeng et al. 2006
20 P. shuichengensis Shuicheng County, Guizhou, China* CIB-XM1079 DQ335714 Zeng et al. 2006
21 P. puxiongensis Yuexi County, Sichuan, China* CIB-XM3126 NC_020634 Peng et al. 2010
22 Liua shihi NA NA NC_008078 Zhang et al. 2006
23 Liua tsinpaensis NA NA NC_008081 Zhang et al. 2006
24 Batrachuperus londongensis NA NA NC_008077 Zhang et al. 2006
25 Batrachuperus pinchonii NA NA NC_008083 Zhang et al. 2006
26 Batrachuperus tibetanus NA NA NC_008085 Zhang et al. 2006
27 Batrachuperus yenyuanensis NA NA NC_012430 Zhang et al. 2006
28 Salamandrella keyserlingii NA NA NC_008082 Zhang et al. 2006

Multiple sequence alignment was performed using MAFFT v.7.4 (Katoh and Standley 2013) within PhyloSuite v.1.2.3 (Zhang et al. 2020a) and checked using MEGA v.7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016) to rule out possible errors. In addition, PartitionFinder v.2.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2017) was used to select the best-fit partitioning and nucleotide substitution model for the two datasets based on the Bayesian information criterion. In dataset 1, each gene fragment was preset as an independent partition. We followed a previous study and selected the genus Liua (two species), the genus Batrachuperus (four species), and Salamandrella keyserlingii as outgroups (Table 1).

For dataset 1, phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) methods based on best-fit partitioning and nucleotide substitution models. Bayesian inference analysis was performed using MrBayes v.3.2.1 (Ronquist et al. 2012). Each BI analysis was run independently using four Markov chain Monte Carlo chains (three heated chains and one cold chain) starting with a random tree; each chain was run for two million generations and sampled every 1,000 generations. Convergence of the data runs was confirmed when the average standard deviation of split frequencies was less than 0.01. The ML analysis was performed using IQ-TREE v.2.0.4 (Nguyen et al. 2015) based on the best-fit model with 10,000 ultrafast bootstrap (UFB) replicates (Hoang et al. 2018). The ML analysis was performed until a correlation coefficient of at least 0.99 was achieved.

Species delimitation and genetic distances

To infer whether the juvenile sample represents a cryptic species and to identify possible cryptic species within the genus Pseudohynobius, we performed species delimitation. We employed three species delimitation methods based on the concept of phylogenetic species: Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP) (Puillandre et al. 2021), based on sequence variation; the Bayesian implementation of the Poisson Tree Processes (bPTP) (Zhang et al. 2013) and Multi-rate Poisson Tree Processes (mPTP) (Kapli et al. 2017), both based on phylogenetic trees. Tree-based approaches incorporate phylogenetic relationships and are particularly useful when branch lengths reflect evolutionary divergence, while ASAP focuses on pairwise genetic distances and tends to be more conservative (Zhang et al. 2013; Kapli et al. 2017; Puillandre et al. 2021). This complementary use of multiple methods allows for a more comprehensive and reliable assessment, especially in light of potential variation in sampling strategy and population history. For ASAP (https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/asap, accessed January 11, 2025), the calculations were performed online using dataset 1 and the default parameters. For bPTP (https://species.h-its.org, accessed January 11, 2025) and mPTP (http://mptp.h-its.org, accessed January 11, 2025), the calculations were performed online using the ML tree and the time tree of dataset 1, with the default parameters. Final species definition results were obtained from the consensus of the three delimitation methods.

Genetic distances were calculated using the uncorrected p-distance model with 1,000 bootstrap replications in MEGA v.7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016).

Divergence time estimation

Molecular dating and time tree reconstruction were conducted in BEAST v.2.4.7 (Bouckaert et al. 2014), using dataset 2. We set two calibration nodes with reference to Chen et al. (2015): (1) the divergence of Salamandrella keyserlingii from Liua and Batrachuperus occurred at 33.3 Ma, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 38.6–28.4 Ma; (2) the MRCA of the genus Pseudohynobius was at 6.7 Ma (95% CI: 8.7–5.0 Ma). The BEAST analysis used an uncorrelated lognormal relaxed clock and a Yule tree prior. The analysis was run for 200 million generations and sampled every 1,000 generations. All calibrations used a normal prior, monophyly, and standard deviation values of 2.7 (for calibration node 1) and 1.0 (for calibration node 2). Convergence of run parameters was checked using Tracer v.1.7.1 (Rambaut et al. 2018) to ensure that the effective sample size of all parameters was greater than 200. Three runs were performed, and the resulting trees were merged using LogCombiner v.2.4.7 (Bouckaert et al. 2014). A maximum clade credibility tree was generated using TreeAnnotator v.2.4.7 (Bouckaert et al. 2014) with a burn-in of 25%.

Ancestral area reconstruction and dynamic meta-analysis

The possible ancestral areas and dispersal routes of the genus Pseudohynobius were reconstructed using the package BioGeoBEARS (Matzke 2013). Prior to analysis, six models were evaluated to select the best-fitting model (Matzke 2014), including Dispersal–Extinction–Cladogenesis (DEC), a maximum likelihood version of Dispersal–Vicariance Analysis (DIVALIKE), and a Bayesian biogeographic inference model (BAYAREALIKE), each with and without founder-event speciation (+J). The maximum number of areas in the ancestral ranges was limited to two.

To infer the divergence dynamics of the genus Pseudohynobius, we followed the methods outlined in a previous phylogenetic study (Li et al. 2024). Results from BEAST were summarized to obtain time intervals with 95% confidence intervals for lineage divergence events. These events were defined as the maximum number of observed lineage divergence events (MDivE) per 0.5 Ma and were used to illustrate temporal trends. The data were smoothed by calculating means using a 0.5 Ma sliding window.

Results

Sequence information and elevation distribution

The total lengths of dataset 1 and dataset 2 were 1,140 bp (640 conserved sites, 500 variable sites, and 393 parsimony-informative sites) and 15,540 bp (10,147 conserved sites, 5,351 variable sites, and 3,509 parsimony-informative sites), respectively. For dataset 1, the nucleotide substitution models for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd codons are TVMEF+G, TRN+I, and HKY+G. The nucleotide substitution model for dataset 2 is shown in Table 2. The newly sequenced mitogenome was deposited in NCBI under accession number PV018879.

Table 2.

Best-fit partitioning and evolutionary models of the mitogenome (dataset 2) used for phylogenetic analysis.

ID Partition schemes Length (bp) Best Model
1 12S, 16S 2569 GTR+I+G
2 tRNAs 1557 HKY+G
3 Cyt b, ATP6, ND1, ND3, ND2, ND4, ND5, ATP8, ND4L 7863 TVM+I+G
4 COI, COII, COIII 3032 GTR+I+G
5 ND6 519 HKY+I

Species of the genus Pseudohynobius show a west-to-east distribution pattern in southwestern China, along the Hengduan Mountains, the Wumeng Mountains, the Dalou Mountains, and the Wuling–Wushan Mountains (Fig. 1). The overall trend in elevation decreases from west to east, with a mean elevation of about 1,750 m. Among them, P. puxiongensis, P. shuichengensis, and P. jinfo are distributed above 1,750 m, while P. flavomaculatus, P. guizhouensis, P. kuankuoshuiensis, and the two cryptic species occur below this elevation (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. 

Elevational ranges of species of the genus Pseudohynobius, with dashed lines indicating mean elevations.

Species delimitation, phylogeny, and genetic distance

Species delimitation based on 28 Cyt b sequences using three methods (ASAP, bPTP, and mPTP) assigned the sequences to eight phylogenetic species within Pseudohynobius (Suppl. materials 13). The newly collected single sample and P. flavomaculatus (DQ335719) were identified as independent phylogenetic species, designated Pseudohynobius sp. 1 and Pseudohynobius sp. 2, while P. flavomaculatus (MT476485) clustered with four samples of P. jinfo (Suppl. materials 13).

Both maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses of dataset 1 produced the same topology (Fig. 4, Suppl. material 4). The BI and ML trees showed similar branch lengths and support values; within Pseudohynobius, the BI tree had 16 internal nodes with posterior probability support > 0.95 (Fig. 4A), and the ML tree had 12 internal nodes with bootstrap support > 95% (Fig. 4B). For species-level clades, low support was observed only between P. kuankuoshuiensis and two other species (Pseudohynobius sp. 1 and P. guizhouensis). Pseudohynobius can be divided into three clades: Clade I, the basal clade, includes only P. puxiongensis; Clade II contains P. flavomaculatus, Pseudohynobius sp. 2, and P. jinfo; and Clade III includes P. shuichengensis, P. kuankuoshuiensis, Pseudohynobius sp. 1, and P. guizhouensis (Fig. 4). A similar topology was obtained for the BI tree reconstructed from dataset 2 (Fig. 5), but it showed distinct inconsistencies between P. shuichengensis and P. kuankuoshuiensis (Suppl. material 5).

Figure 4. 

Phylogeny and species delimitation based on mitochondrial Cyt b. A. BI tree; Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) from BI analyses are shown at nodes; B. ML tree; ultrafast bootstrap supports (UFB) from ML analyses are shown at nodes. Branches are color-coded to represent different species based on the consensus results of species delimitation using ASAP, bPTP, and mPTP.

Genetic distances based on Cyt b revealed that the two cryptic lineages exhibit minimum interspecific distances of 3.2% and 4.2% compared to other congeners (Table 3), which are substantially higher than the recently reported minimum distance of 2.1% between Hynobius chinensis and H. guabangshanensis (Wang et al. 2023). This indicates that genetic differentiation between the two cryptic lineages and their closely related species has reached the species level.

Table 3.

Uncorrected p-distance between Pseudohynobius species for the mitochondrial Cyt b gene.

ID Species 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Pseudohynobius sp. 1
2 Pseudohynobius sp. 2 12.7
3 P. flavomaculatus 13.0 4.2
4 P. guizhouensis 3.2 12.7 13.1
5 P. jinfo 14.3 6.1 7.0 14.7
6 P. kuankuoshuiensis 9.8 12.4 12.4 10.1 13.2
7 P. puxiongensis 13.5 15.1 14.8 141 16.2 14.4
8 P. shuichengensis 10.4 12.3 11.8 10.3 13.0 10.5 14.6

Divergence time and biogeography

Our molecular dating results suggest that Pseudohynobius originated in the middle Miocene, approximately 14.57 Ma (95% CI: 19.54–10.32) (node 1), and that the extant crown group originated in the late Miocene, approximately 8.62 Ma (95% CI: 10.48–6.80) (node 2) (Fig. 5A). Interspecific divergence occurred primarily between 8 Ma and 1.4 Ma (Fig. 5A).

Figure 5. 

Time tree, biogeographic history, and diversification dynamics based on mitogenomes. A. Time tree with ancestral area reconstruction. Blue bars at nodes indicate 95% CI of divergence times. Circled nodes represent the most probable ancestral regions; arrows show dispersal directions; B. Possible dispersal routes of the genus Pseudohynobius; C. Divergence dynamics based on the maximum number of observed lineage divergence events (MDivE) per Ma. OIHM: orogeny intensification of the Hengduan Mountains; D. Global temperature inferred from deep-sea oxygen isotope records (δ18O) in benthic foraminifera (Zachos et al. 2008), modeled mean annual precipitation under idealized CO2 levels (Farnsworth et al. 2019).

Changes in clade divergence within Pseudohynobius were assessed over time using biogeographic dynamic meta-analysis. In total, nine clade divergence events were identified (Suppl. material 6). MDivE analyses showed that cladistic divergence began at approximately 10 Ma, increased rapidly between 8 and 5 Ma, peaked around 4 Ma, and declined sharply after 2 Ma (Fig. 5B).

The results of ancestral area reconstruction are shown in Fig. 5, Suppl. material 4. Models with “+J” had higher log-likelihood (LnL) values than those without, indicating a significantly better fit in all cases except for DIVALIKE (Table 4). Under the best-fit DEC+J model, vicariance and dispersal events likely shaped the current diversity and distribution of Pseudohynobius. Ancestral area reconstruction under this model suggests that the most recent common ancestor of extant Pseudohynobius most likely inhabited the Hengduan Mountains and the Dalou Mountains (Fig. 5A). An initial vicariant event separated the ancestral populations into Clade I and Clades II–III, after which the ancestral populations in the Dalou Mountains dispersed into the Wumeng Mountains, the Wuling–Wushan Mountains, and the Miaoling Mountains at 4.71 Ma, 3.19 Ma, and 1.44 Ma, respectively (Fig. 5A). In situ diversification in the Dalou and Wuling–Wushan Mountains may also have contributed to species formation, as in the cases of P. jinfo and P. flavomaculatus (Fig. 5A).

Table 4.

Estimated parameters and statistical results for six models (DEC, DIVALIKE, BAYAREALIKE, and their corresponding +J models) using the R package BioGeoBEARS. The model with the highest AIC model weight is considered the best model and is shown in bold. Abbreviations: LnL, log-likelihood; d, rate of dispersal; e, rate of extinction; j, likelihood of founder-event speciation at cladogenesis; AIC, Akaike’s information criterion.

Model LnL Number of parameters d e j AIC AIC model weight
DEC -17.72 2 0.027 0.034 0 39.44 0.003
DEC+J -11.51 3 1.00E-12 1.00E-12 0.15 29.03 0.550
DIVALIKE -14.24 2 0.021 1.00E-12 0 32.49 0.098
DIVALIKE+J -14.24 2 0.021 1.00E-12 0 32.49 0.098
BAYAREALIKE -21.57 2 0.048 0.160 0 47.14 6.40E-05
BAYAREALIKE+J -12.30 3 1.00E-07 1.00E-07 0.16 30.60 0.250

Discussion

Phylogeny and underestimated diversity of the genus Pseudohynobius

Our phylogeny is consistent with the results of Yang et al. (2013): P. puxiongensis represents the basalmost clade, Clade I; P. flavomaculatus and P. jinfo comprise Clade II; and P. guizhouensis, P. kuankuoshuiensis, and P. shuichengensis comprise Clade III. However, we also discovered that P. kuankuoshuiensis is only moderately supported as the sister clade of P. guizhouensisPseudohynobius sp. 1 (Figs 4, 5). DensiTree plots, in which the topologies of multiple time trees were superimposed, showed discordance between P. kuankuoshuiensis and P. shuichengensis (Suppl. material 5). We hypothesize that gene flow may be the main contributor to this discordance. Similar discordance was observed between Pseudohynobius, Liua, and Batrachuperus, which have a phylogenetic relationship of (Liua, (Batrachuperus, Pseudohynobius)) (Figs 4, 5) or (Pseudohynobius, (Liua, Batrachuperus)) (Zhang et al. 2022), but the nuclear gene tree supports a topology of (Batrachuperus, (Pseudohynobius, Liua)) (Chen et al. 2015). In addition, we also took into account the taxonomic controversy mentioned in the introduction, as it may influence the interpretation of phylogenetic and biogeographic reconstruction results. Evidence has been presented that gene flow, incomplete lineage sorting, and hybridization may all contribute to this discordance (Meleshko et al. 2021; Rivas-González et al. 2023), but the major contribution remains to be supported by phylogenomic evidence.

Integrating taxonomy for species delimitation is becoming a consensus, where phylogenetic species should be accepted when evidence of phylogenetic isolation is supported by other results, e.g., morphology, reproduction, and climatic niche (van Elst et al. 2025). In this study, phylogeny (Fig. 3), species delimitation (Suppl. materials 1, 2), and genetic distance (Table 3) support the existence of two cryptic phylogenetic species in Pseudohynobius: Pseudohynobius sp. 1 from Xishui, Guizhou (Fig. 2A, B), and Pseudohynobius sp. 2 from Tianping Mountain, Sangzhi County, Hunan. We also acknowledge that for the two identified cryptic lineages, species delimitation was based on Cyt b sequences from only a single sample, and no morphological comparisons were possible due to the lack of adult specimens and detailed morphological data. This limitation may introduce additional bias. Therefore, future efforts that expand field surveys to include more specimens, incorporate nuclear gene fragments or even genome-wide data, and obtain sufficient morphological evidence—particularly from adult individuals—will be essential to provide more robust support for species delimitation.

In addition, further surveys are needed in the Dalou Mountains, Wuling Mountains, and Wushan Mountains. For example, our 2022 photographs of unknown species of the genus Pseudohynobius in the Fanjingshan Mountains (Figs 1, 2C), combined with the two new cryptic species revealed in this study, suggest that the range and diversity of the genus Pseudohynobius need to be reassessed, which is valuable for formulating conservation policies and carrying out conservation actions.

High-elevation speciation dominated by orogeny

For the mitogenome, the estimated origination time for the total group of Pseudohynobius (14.57 Ma vs. 49.85 Ma) and for crown group Pseudohynobius (8.62 Ma vs. 33.38 Ma) are younger than those reported by Zhang et al. (2022). The reasons for generating older divergence times are related to alternative saturation and the rapid evolution of mitochondrial DNA, resulting in rather ancient estimates (Zheng et al. 2011; Chen et al. 2015). However, we cannot simply assume that divergence times assessed using mitogenomes are always less precise than those derived from nuclear markers or that mitochondrial dates are always overestimated (Chen et al. 2015). When divergence times are less than 15 Ma, mitochondrial substitutional saturation is minimal, and estimates based on mitochondrial data can still be precise (Chen et al. 2015). Our origin and interspecific divergence times are in close agreement with the results of Chen et al. (2015) and are less than 15 Ma, so it can be assumed that it is reasonable for us to infer the timing of the origin and divergence of the genus Pseudohynobius.

Orogeny and low temperatures have promoted divergence and diversification within the genus Pseudohynobius. Orogeny creates a variety of environmental conditions, including climatic niches, new habitats, and dispersal barriers, while low temperatures may isolate populations in specific habitats—all of which are conducive to promoting speciation (Hoorn et al. 2013; Xing and Ree 2017; Rahbek et al. 2019a; Li et al. 2021). Our inferred MDivE curve (Fig. 5C) shows that the divergence rate of Pseudohynobius was high between 9 and 4 Ma, and the diversification trend coincides with the rapid uplift of the Hengduan Mountains and the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau from the late Miocene to late Pliocene (Zhou and Chen 1993; Sun et al. 2011; Favre et al. 2015), suggesting that the diversification of Pseudohynobius may be closely linked to orogenic events in these regions.

As part of the continued expansion of orogeny—such as the uplift of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (Ding et al. 2022) and the right-lateral extrusion of Indochina (Zhang et al. 2009; Fyhn and Phach 2015)—the Hengduan Mountains and the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau experienced rapid uplift during the late Miocene, peaking just before the late Pliocene (Zhou and Chen 1993; Zhang et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2012). Strong orogeny shaped high-elevation mountains and varied microhabitats, which may have driven differentiation of ecological niches among populations (Rahbek et al. 2019b). Topography and microclimatic changes may have led Pseudohynobius to favor narrow, high-altitude cold regions, thereby promoting adaptation and speciation at high elevations (Fig. 2) (Fei and Ye 2016). For instance, in P. jinfo, the capillaries are in close contact with and protrude toward the epidermis, while the dorsal pigmentation layer is more developed (Jing et al. 2017). Such features in the high-altitude frog Nanorana parkeri have been linked to adaptations to hypoxia and elevated ultraviolet radiation at high altitudes (Yang et al. 2019; Fu et al. 2022).

Topographic changes influence the formation and migration of rivers, which may also act as barriers to gene flow between distinct populations. At present, the Jinshajiang River, Wujiang River, and Qingshuijiang River serve as geographical boundaries separating the distributions of species within the genus (Fig. 1). U-Pb dating evidence based on detrital zircon grains suggests that the establishment of the modern Yangtze River occurred in the late Miocene, from about 11 to 5 Ma (Fu et al. 2021; He et al. 2023), which is consistent with the divergence of the basal clade P. puxiongensis from 10.48 to 6.8 Ma (Fig. 4). Interspecific divergence within Clade II, on the other hand, corresponds to the formation of the Wujiang and Miaoling Mountains during the Pliocene to early Pleistocene (Zhou and Chen 1993), which may have served as geographic barriers contributing to species divergence. Distribution patterns of batrachians inhabiting southwestern China are severely affected by orogeny and riverine barriers, with close examples including Batrachuperus yenyuanensis (Jia et al. 2019), Glyphoglossus yunnanensis (Zhang et al. 2020b), and the Paramesotriton caudopunctatus complex (Chen et al. 2011; Luo et al. 2021). In addition, the intensification of the Asian monsoon may have promoted plant growth and geomorphological erosion in southwestern China (Fig. 4C), thereby providing abundant food resources and geographic isolation (Antonelli et al. 2018; Ding et al. 2020), which in turn created new ecological and evolutionary opportunities for speciation.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This study was supported by the 2024 National Key Protected Wildlife Resources Survey in Xishui County, Guizhou Province, China (11904/0624063), the 2024 National Key Protected Wildlife Resources Survey in the Chishui River Basin, Guizhou (P52000020240003VQ), and the Research Project on the Reproductive Biology of the Hainan Gibbon (KY-2000105-KT).

Authors’ contributions

Tao Luo, Jiang Zhou, and Huai-Qing Deng conceived and designed the research; Tao Luo, Zhong-Lian Wang, and Zi-Fa Zhao conducted field surveys and collected samples; Tao Luo and Ming-Yuan Xiao analyzed genetic data; and Tao Luo, Ning Xiao, and Jiang Zhou wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Chang-Ting Lan and local residents who helped in the fieldwork. We are grateful to LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

References

  • AmphibiaChina (2025) The database of Chinese amphibians. Kunming Institute of Zoology (CAS), Kunming, Yunnan, China. http://www.amphibiachina.org/ [November 25th, 2024]
  • Antonelli A, Kissling WD, Flantua SGA, Bermúdez MA, Mulch A, Muellner-Riehl AN, Kreft H, Linder HP, Badgley C, Fjeldså J, Fritz SA, Rahbek C, Herman F, Hooghiemstra H, Hoorn C (2018) Geological and climatic influences on mountain biodiversity. Nature Geoscience 11(10): 718–725. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0236-z
  • Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu C-H, Xie D, Suchard MA, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2014) BEAST 2: A software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Computational Biology 10(4): e1003537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537
  • Che J, Zhou WW, Hu JS, Yan F, Papenfuss TJ, Wake DB, Zhang YP (2010) Spiny frogs (Paini) illuminate the history of the Himalayan region and Southeast Asia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107(31): 13765–13770. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008415107
  • Chen S (2023) Ultrafast one‐pass FASTQ data preprocessing, quality control, and deduplication using fastp. iMeta 2(2): e107. https://doi.org/10.1002/imt2.107
  • Chen G, Xiao Y, Chen X, Gu X (2011) Genetic diversity analysis of D-loop region in populations of Paramesotriton caudopunctatus. Dongwuxue Zazhi 46(3): 55–63.
  • Chen MY, Mao RL, Liang D, Kuro-o M, Zeng XM, Zhang P (2015) A reinvestigation of phylogeny and divergence times of Hynobiidae (Amphibia, Caudata) based on 29 nuclear genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 83: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.10.010
  • Ding WN, Ree RH, Spicer RA, Xing YW (2020) Ancient orogenic and monsoon-driven assembly of the world’s richest temperate alpine flora. science 369(6503): 578–581. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb4484
  • Ding L, Kapp P, Cai F, Garzione CN, Xiong Z, Wang H, Wang C (2022) Timing and mechanisms of Tibetan Plateau uplift. Nature Reviews. Earth & Environment 3(10): 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00318-4
  • Dubois A, Ohler A, Pyron RA (2021) New concepts and methods for phylogenetic taxonomy and nomenclature in zoology, exemplified by a new ranked cladonomy of recent amphibians (Lissamphibia). Megataxa 5(1): 1–738. https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.5.1.1
  • Farnsworth A, Lunt DJ, Robinson SA, Valdes PJ, Roberts WH, Clift PD, Markwick P, Su T, Wrobel N, Bragg F (2019) Past East Asian monsoon evolution controlled by paleogeography, not CO2. Science Advances 5(10): eaax1697. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax1697
  • Favre A, Päckert M, Pauls SU, Jähnig SC, Uhl D, Michalak I, Muellner-Riehl AN (2015) The role of the uplift of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau for the evolution of Tibetan biotas. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 90(1): 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12107
  • Fei L, Ye C (2000) A new hynobiid subfamily with a new genus and new species of Hynobiidae from West China. Cultum Herpetologica Sinica 8: 64–70.
  • Fei L, Ye CY (2016) Amphibians of China. Vol. 1, Science Press, Beijing, 349–368.
  • Fei L, Hu SQ, Ye CY, Huang GP (2006) Fauna Sinica: Amphibia. Vol. 1, Science Press, 294–313.
  • Feijó A, Ge D, Wen Z, Cheng J, Xia L, Patterson BD, Yang Q (2022) Mammalian diversification bursts and biotic turnovers are synchronous with Cenozoic geoclimatic events in Asia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119(49): e2207845119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2207845119
  • Frost DR (2025) Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.2. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.5531/db.vz.0001 [July 15, 2025]
  • Fu X, Zhu W, Geng J, Yang S, Zhong K, Huang X, Zhang L, Xu X (2021) The present-day Yangtze River was established in the late Miocene: Evidence from detrital zircon ages. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 205: 104600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2020.104600
  • Fu TT, Sun YB, Gao W, Long CB, Yang CH, Yang XW, Zhang Y, Lan XQ, Huang S, Jin JQ, Murphy RW, Zhang Y, Lai R, Hillis DM, Zhang YP, Che J (2022) The highest-elevation frog provides insights into mechanisms and evolution of defenses against high UV radiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119(46): e2212406119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2212406119
  • Fyhn MB, Phach PV (2015) Late Neogene structural inversion around the northern Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam: Effects from right‐lateral displacement across the Red River fault zone. Tectonics 34(2): 290–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014TC003674
  • Guo P, Zhu F, Liu Q, Wang P, Che J, Nguyen TQ (2020) Out of the Hengduan Mountains: Molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the Asian water snake genus Trimerodytes (Squamata, Colubridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 152: 106927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106927
  • He J, Garzanti E, Jiang T, Barbarano M, Liu E, Chen S, Liao Y, Li X, Wang H (2023) Evolution of eastern Asia river systems reconstructed by the mineralogy and detrital-zircon geochronology of modern Red River and coastal Vietnam river sand. Earth-Science Reviews 245: 104572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104572
  • Hoang DT, Chernomor O, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS (2018) UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(2): 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx281
  • IUCN (2025) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025-1. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gran, Switzerland. https://www.iucnredlist.org [July 15, 2025]
  • Jia J, Jiang JP, Zhang MH, Gao KQ (2019) Osteology of Batrachuperus yenyuanensis (Urodela, Hynobiidae), a high-altitude mountain stream salamander from western China. PLoS ONE 14(1): e0211069. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211069
  • Jia J, Gao KQ, Jiang JP, Bever GS, Xiong R, Wei G (2021) Comparative osteology of the hynobiid complex Liua-Protohynobius-Pseudohynobius (Amphibia, Urodela): I. Cranial anatomy of Pseudohynobius. Journal of Anatomy 238(2): 219–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13311
  • Jiang J, Cai B, Wang B, Chen W, Wen Z, Zhang D, Wang W, Sui L, Ma S (2024) New vertebrate species discovered in China in 2023. Biodiversity Science 32(11): 24327. https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2024327
  • Kapli P, Lutteropp S, Zhang J, Kobert K, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A, Flouri T (2017) Multi-rate Poisson tree processes for single-locus species delimitation under maximum likelihood and Markov chain Monte Carlo. Bioinformatics 33(11): 1630–1638. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx025
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33(7): 1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
  • Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B (2017) PartitionFinder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34(3): 772–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260
  • Li S, Tian Y, Gu X (2010) A new species of the genus Pseudohynobius (Caudata, Hynobiidae) from Guizhou, China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 35(2): 407–412.
  • Li SF, Valdes PJ, Farnsworth A, Davies-Barnard T, Su T, Lunt DJ, Spicer RA, Liu J, Deng WYD, Huang J, Tang H, Ridgwell A, Chen LL, Zhou ZK (2021) Orographic evolution of northern Tibet shaped vegetation and plant diversity in eastern Asia. Science Advances 7(5): eabc7741. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc7741
  • Li XQ, Peng HW, Xiang KL, Xiang XG, Jabbour F, Ortiz RdC, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Wang W (2024) Phylogenetic evidence clarifies the history of the extrusion of Indochina. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 121(35): e2322527121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.232252712
  • Luo T, Wen H, Gao K, Zhou J, Zhou J (2021) Phylogeography and cryptic species diversity of Paramesotriton caudopunctatus species group (Salamandridae, Paramesotriton) in Guizhou, China. Asian Herpetological Research 12(2): 188–200. https://doi.org/10.16373/j.cnki.ahr.200025
  • Luo T, Yan SS, Xiao N, Zhou JJ, Wang XL, Chen WC, Deng HQ, Zhang BW, Zhou J (2022) Phylogenetic analysis of combined mitochondrial genome and 32 nuclear genes provides key insights into molecular systematics and historical biogeography of Asian warty newts of the genus Paramesotriton (Caudata, Salamandridae). Zoological Research 43(5): 787–804. https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2022.081
  • Luo T, Zhao XR, Lan CT, Li W, Deng HQ, Xiao N, Zhou J (2023) Integrated phylogenetic analyses reveal the evolutionary, biogeographic, and diversification history of Asian warty treefrog genus Theloderma (Anura, Rhacophoridae). Ecology and Evolution 13(12): e10829. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10829
  • Luo T, Luo FW, Lan CT, Xiao MY, Zhou JJ, Liao M, Xiao N, Zhou J (2024) Evolutionary history of Chinese karst loaches (Nemacheilidae, Karstsinnectes): New insights from mitochondrial-based genomes and description of a new species from Guangxi, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 100(4): 1473–1486. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.100.133964
  • Luo T, Lan CT, Yu J, Song LX, Fan C, Wang JJ, Zhou JJ, Xiao N, Zhou J (2025) Rapid speciation of Chinese hypogean fishes driven by paleogeoclimatic and morphological adaptations. Current Zoology XX: zoaf010. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoaf010
  • Matzke NJ (2013) Probabilistic historical biogeography: New models for founder-event speciation, imperfect detection, and fossils allow improved accuracy and model-testing. Frontiers of Biogeography 5(4): 242–248.
  • Matzke NJ (2014) Model selection in historical biogeography reveals that founder-event speciation is a crucial process in island clades. Systematic Biology 63(6): 951–970. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu056
  • Meleshko O, Martin MD, Korneliussen TS, Schröck C, Lamkowski P, Schmutz J, Healey A, Piatkowski BT, Shaw AJ, Weston DJ, Flatberg KI, Szövényi P, Hassel K, Stenøien HK (2021) Extensive genome-wide phylogenetic discordance is due to incomplete lineage Sorting and not ongoing introgression in a rapidly radiated bryophyte genus. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38(7): 2750–2766. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab063
  • Meng G, Li Y, Yang C, Liu S (2019) MitoZ: A toolkit for animal mitochondrial genome assembly, annotation and visualization. Nucleic Acids Research 47(11): e63. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz173
  • Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Peng R, Zhang P, Xiong JL, Gu HJ, Zeng XM, Zou FD (2010) Rediscovery of Protohynobius puxiongensis (Caudata, Hynobiidae) and its phylogenetic position based on complete mitochondrial genomes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 56(1): 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2009.12.011
  • Pyron RA, Wiens JJ (2011) A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61(2): 543–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.06.012
  • Rahbek C, Borregaard MK, Antonelli A, Colwell RK, Holt BG, Nogues-Bravo D, Rasmussen CMØ, Richardson K, Rosing MT, Whittaker RJ, Fjeldså J (2019a) Building mountain biodiversity: Geological and evolutionary processes. Science 365(6458): 1114–1119. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0151
  • Rahbek C, Borregaard MK, Colwell RK, Dalsgaard B, Holt BG, Morueta-Holme N, Nogues-Bravo D, Whittaker RJ, Fjeldså J (2019b) Humboldt’s enigma: What causes global patterns of mountain biodiversity? Science 365(6458): 1108–1113. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0149
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67(5): 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Rivas-González I, Rousselle M, Li F, Zhou L, Dutheil JY, Munch K, Shao Y, Wu D, Schierup MH, Zhang G (2023) Pervasive incomplete lineage sorting illuminates speciation and selection in primates. Science 380(6648): eabn4409. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn4409
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Sun BN, Wu JY, Liu YS, Ding ST, Li XC, Xie SP, Yan DF, Lin ZC (2011) Reconstructing Neogene vegetation and climates to infer tectonic uplift in western Yunnan, China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 304(3): 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.09.023
  • Tian Y, Li S, Gu X (2006) A new species of genus Pseudohynobius (Caudata, Hynobiidae)—Pseudohynobius shuichengensis. Acta Zoologica Sinica 52(3): 522–527.
  • van Elst T, Sgarlata GM, Schüßler D, Tiley GP, Poelstra JW, Scheumann M, Blanco MB, Aleixo-Pais IG, Rina Evasoa M, Ganzhorn JU, Goodman SM, Hasiniaina AF, Hending D, Hohenlohe PA, Ibouroi MT, Iribar A, Jan F, Kappeler PM, Le Pors B, Manzi S, Olivieri G, Rakotonanahary AN, Rakotondranary SJ, Rakotondravony R, Ralison JM, Ranaivoarisoa JF, Randrianambinina B, Rasoloarison RM, Rasoloharijaona S, Rasolondraibe E, Teixeira H, Zaonarivelo JR, Louis EE, Yoder AD, Chikhi L, Radespiel U, Salmona J (2025) Integrative taxonomy clarifies the evolution of a cryptic primate clade. Nature Ecology & Evolution 9(1): 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02547-w
  • Wang Y, Zheng J, Zhang W, Li S, Liu X, Yang X, Liu Y (2012) Cenozoic uplift of the Tibetan Plateau: Evidence from the tectonic–sedimentary evolution of the western Qaidam Basin. Geoscience Frontiers 3(2): 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.11.005
  • Wang X, Liang D, Wang X, Tang M, Liu Y, Liu S, Zhang P (2022) Phylogenomics reveals the evolution, biogeography, and diversification history of voles in the Hengduan Mountains. Communications Biology 5(1): 1124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-04108-y
  • Wang Z, Othman SN, Qiu Z, Lu Y, Prasad VK, Dong Y, Lu CH, Borzée A (2023) An Isolated and Deeply Divergent Hynobius Species from Fujian, China. Animals 13: 1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13101661
  • Wen H, Luo T, Wang Y, Wang S, Liu T, Xiao N, Zhou J (2022) Molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the cave fish genus Sinocyclocheilus (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae) in southwest China. Integrative Zoology 17(2): 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1749-4877.12624
  • Xia Y, Gu HF, Peng R, Chen Q, Zheng YC, Murphy RW, Zeng XM (2012) COI is better than 16S rRNA for DNA barcoding Asiatic salamanders (Amphibia, Caudata, Hynobiidae). Molecular Ecology Resources 12(1): 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03055.x
  • Xing Y, Ree RH (2017) Uplift-driven diversification in the Hengduan Mountains, a temperate biodiversity hotspot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114(17): E3444–E3451. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616063114
  • Xu N, Zeng X, Fu J (2007) A new species of the genus Pseudohynobius (Caudata, Hynobiidae) from China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 31(1): 230–233.
  • Xu W, Wu YH, Zhou WW, Chen HM, Zhang BL, Chen JM, Xu W, Rao DQ, Zhao H, Yan F (2024) Hidden hotspots of amphibian biodiversity in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 121(20): e2320674121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2320674121
  • Yang C, Wang C, Tian Y, Li S, Gu X (2013) Phylogenetic Relationships of Pseudohynobius (Caudata, Hynobiidae) Based on Mitochondrial cyt b Sequences. Journal of Liupanshui Normal University 25(1): 39–43.
  • Yang C, Fu T, Lan X, Zhang Y, Nneji LM, Murphy RW, Sun Y, Che J (2019) Comparative skin histology of frogs reveals high-elevation adaptation of the Tibetan Nanorana parkeri. Asian Herpetological Research 10(2): 79–85. https://doi.org/10.16373/j.cnki.ahr.180093
  • Zachos JC, Dickens GR, Zeebe RE (2008) An early Cenozoic perspective on greenhouse warming and carbon-cycle dynamics. Nature 451(7176): 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06588
  • Zeng X, Fu J, Chen L, Tian Y, Chen X (2006) Cryptic species and systematics of the hynobiid salamanders of the LiuaPseudohynobius complex: Molecular and phylogenetic perspectives. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 34(6): 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2006.01.006
  • Zhang P, Chen YQ, Zhou H, Liu YF, Wang XL, Papenfuss TJ, Wake DB, Qu LH (2006) Phylogeny, evolution, and biogeography of Asiatic Salamanders (Hynobiidae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103(19): 7360–7365. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602325103
  • Zhang B, Liu R, Xiang H, Wan J, Huang X (2009) FT dating of fault rocks in the central‐southern section of the Red River Fault zone and its geological implications. Seismology and Geology 31(1): 44–56.
  • Zhang D, Gao F, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li WX, Wang GT (2020a) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20(1): 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13096
  • Zhang DR, Hui H, Yu GH, Song XQ, Liu S, Yuan SQ, Xiao H, Rao DQ (2020b) Shared response to changes in drainage basin: Phylogeography of the Yunnan small narrow‐mouthed frog, Glyphoglossus yunnanensis (Anura: Microhylidae). Ecology and Evolution 10(3): 1567–1580. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6011
  • Zhang Y, Wang M, Cheng R, Luo Y, Li Y, Liu Z, Chen Q, Shen Y (2022) Mitochondrial characteristics of Pseudohynobius flavomaculatus a protected salamander in China, and biogeographical implications for the family Hynobiidae (Amphibia, Caudata). Zoosystematics and Evolution 98(2): 263–274. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.98.66578
  • Zhao Y, Su L, Zhang Z, Wang X (2016) Phylogenetic relationships of Pseudohynobius (Urodela, Hynobiidae) inferred from DNA barcoding analysis. Genetics and Molecular Research 15(2): gmr.15028155. http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/gmr.15028155.
  • Zheng Y, Peng R, Kuro-o M, Zeng X (2011) Exploring patterns and extent of bias in estimating divergence time from mitochondrial DNA sequence data in a particular lineage: A case study of Salamanders (Order Caudata). Molecular Biology and Evolution 28(9): 2521–2535. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr072
  • Zhou Q, Chen P (1993) Lithofacies change and palaeogeographical evolution during Late Cenozoic in Guizhou and its vicinity. Geology of Guizhou 10(3): 201–207.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

Species delimitation results using ASAP

Tao Luo, Zi-Fa Zhao, Zhong-Lian Wang, Ming-Yuan Xiao, Ning Xiao, Huai-Qing Deng, Jiang Zhou

Data type: png

Explanation note: Text.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (330.12 kb)
Supplementary material 2 

Species delimitation results using bPTP

Tao Luo, Zi-Fa Zhao, Zhong-Lian Wang, Ming-Yuan Xiao, Ning Xiao, Huai-Qing Deng, Jiang Zhou

Data type: png

Explanation note: Text.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (338.70 kb)
Supplementary material 3 

Species delimitation results using mPTP

Tao Luo, Zi-Fa Zhao, Zhong-Lian Wang, Ming-Yuan Xiao, Ning Xiao, Huai-Qing Deng, Jiang Zhou

Data type: png

Explanation note: Text.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (269.86 kb)
Supplementary material 4 

Phylogenetic analysis and species delimitation of the raw tree topology

Tao Luo, Zi-Fa Zhao, Zhong-Lian Wang, Ming-Yuan Xiao, Ning Xiao, Huai-Qing Deng, Jiang Zhou

Data type: png

Explanation note: Text.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (222.44 kb)
Supplementary material 5 

DensiTree plot of mitochondrial genome-based time tree reconstruction

Tao Luo, Zi-Fa Zhao, Zhong-Lian Wang, Ming-Yuan Xiao, Ning Xiao, Huai-Qing Deng, Jiang Zhou

Data type: png

Explanation note: Text.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (1.42 MB)
Supplementary material 6 

The inferred lineage divergence events associated with the Pseudohynobius and their ages

Tao Luo, Zi-Fa Zhao, Zhong-Lian Wang, Ming-Yuan Xiao, Ning Xiao, Huai-Qing Deng, Jiang Zhou

Data type: docx

Explanation note: Text.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (14.40 kb)
login to comment