Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Ya-Hui Zhao ( zhaoyh@ioz.ac.cn ) Academic editor: Nicolas Hubert
© 2025 Zhi-Xian Sun, Xue-Yuan Li, Xue-Jian Li, Jun-Yuan Hao, Dong Sheng, Ya-Hui Zhao.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Sun Z-X, Li X-Y, Li X-J, Hao J-Y, Sheng D, Zhao Y-H (2025) Cobitis beijingensis, a new spined loach from northern China (Cypriniformes, Cobitidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 101(1): 55-67. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.101.137363
|
A new spined loach, Cobitis beijingensis, is described from Beijing, China. The new species can be distinguished from other congeners by a combination of characters: 1) Lamina circularis on pectoral fin of male elongated, posterior margin slightly serrated; 2) possessing 14–18 (mode 15) pre-pelvic myotomes; 3) pelvic fin inserted below 3rd–5th branched dorsal-fin ray; 4) total vertebrae 4+ 36–38 (mode 37); 5) L2 of the Gambetta’s pattern does not exist or is fused with L1. The molecular phylogenetic analyses based on mitochondrial Cyt b also support C. beijingensis to be a new species.
Beijing, freshwater fish, molecular phylogeny, morphology, taxonomy
The genus Cobitis Linnaeus, 1758, is a widespread and species-rich group of small freshwater fishes that have a slender body and are adapted to the benthic habitat (
Beijing, located in the Haihe River basin of northern China, is one of the distribution areas of Cobitis species (
All examined specimens (n = 118) were collected by hand net, fish trap, cast net, or bought from the local markets. Detailed information on the specimens is listed in the Comparative Materials. Specimens used for morphological study were initially fixed in 10% formalin solution for three days, followed by 70% ethanol alcohol for long-term preservation. Specimens used for molecular phylogenetic study were fixed in 95% ethanol alcohol directly. The holotype and paratypes of the new species were deposited at the
Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (
All measurements were taken point to point with digital calipers to 0.01mm on the left side of the specimens. Counts were also made on the left side of specimens. The specimens (n = 19) used for the vertebral count were radiographed with an XDR-AZ1600 X-ray machine produced by Shanghai Anzhu Photoelectric Technology Co., LTD. X-ray tube voltage 60 kV and the tube current 1 mA. Exposure time: 2s. Standardized measurements, landmarks and meristic counts for the genus Cobitis were listed in detail to build a series for this study.
Counts
Dorsal, anal, pectoral, pelvic-fin rays: the number of unbranched rays and branched rays of fin. The last one and half branched fin rays of dorsal and anal fins are usually counted as one. Gambetta’s pattern: The longitudinal rows of pigmentation along the body. The first Gambetta line (L1) is located on the dorsal; the second to fifth Gambetta lines (L2–L5) are located on the lateral side sequentially (
Body morphometric measurements
The specific morphometric measurements of the body are shown in Fig.
The molecular study was based on the mitochondrial cytochrome-b (cyt-b) sequences (1140 bp). DNA was extracted from the pelvic fin on the right side of the loach. Cyt-b was amplified using the universal primers L14724 (5’-GACTTGAAAAACCACCGTTG-3’) and H15915 (5’-CTCCGATCTCCGGATTACAAGAC-3’). Sequencing reactions were performed according to the operating instructions of BigDye Terminator v3.1 (BDT), with 1μL of primer (3.2 pmol/μL), 1 μL of template DNA, 2 μL of BigDye® Terminator v3.1, and 6 μL of double distilled water (dd H2O) for a total reaction volume of 10 μL. The thermo-cycling conditions were: initial denaturation for 2 min at 96 °C, denaturation for 10 s at 96 °C, annealing for 10 s at 50 °C, and extension for 1 min at 60 °C. After 30 cycles, a final extension was performed at 60 °C for 3 min, and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were preserved at 4 °C. Sequencing was conducted by Beijing TsingKe Biotech Co., Ltd. (China).
The sequencing results were assembled using SeqMan II; other sequences were acquired from the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The voucher ID of each sequence and GenBank accession number are given in Table
Voucher codes, sampling localities, haplotypes, and accession numbers of Cobitis species and outgroup for molecular analyses.
| Voucher Code | Species | Locality | Drainage | Haplotype | Accession no. | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
C. beijingensis sp. nov. | Huairou District, Beijing, China | Haihe River basin | H1 | – | This study |
|
|
C. beijingensis sp. nov. | Huairou District, Beijing, China | Haihe River basin | H2 | – | This study |
|
|
C. beijingensis sp. nov. | Miyun District, Beijing, China | Haihe River basin | H3 | – | This study |
|
|
C. beijingensis sp. nov. | Miyun District, Beijing, China | Haihe River basin | H3 | – | This study |
|
|
C. beijingensis sp. nov. | Miyun District, Beijing, China | Haihe River basin | H3 | – | This study |
|
|
C. beijingensis sp. nov. | Miyun District, Beijing, China | Haihe River basin | H3 | – | This study |
|
|
C. beijingensis sp. nov. | Miyun District, Beijing, China | Haihe River basin | H4 | – | This study |
|
|
C. lutheri | Helong City, Jilin Province, China | Tumen River basin | H5 | – | This study |
|
|
C. lutheri | Wangqing County, Jilin Province, China | Suifen River basin | H6 | – | This study |
|
|
C. lutheri | Wangqing County, Jilin Province, China | Suifen River basin | H7 | – | This study |
|
|
C. lutheri | Wangqing County, Jilin Province, China | Suifen River basin | H8 | – | This study |
| ZMMU P-21919 | C. lutheri | Primorye District, Russia | Tumen River basin | H9 | JN858891 |
|
| – | C. lutheri | Primorye District, Russia | Heilongjiang River basin | H10 | JN858892 |
|
| ZMMU P-21935 | C. lutheri | Khabarovsk District, Russia | Heilongjiang River basin | H11 | JN858893 |
|
| – | C. lutheri | Linjiang City, Liaoning Province, China | Yalu River basin | H12 | KY009953 |
|
| – | C. hankugensis | Korea | – | H13 | MN841275 | Alam et al. 2019 (Direct Submission) |
| – | C. hankugensis | Hapcheon, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea | Nakdong River basin | H13 | MZ339224 |
|
| – | C. nalbanti | Gongju, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea | Geum River basin | H14 | KF661552 |
|
| – | C. nalbanti | Jeonju, Jeollabuk-do, Korea | Mangyeong River basin | H15 | KF661686 |
|
| – | C. tetralineata | Bokeung, Jeollabuk-do, Korea | Dongjin River basin | H16 | KF661612 |
|
| – | C. tetralineata | Imsil, Jeollabuk-do, Korea | Dongjin River basin | H16 | KF661717 |
|
| – | C. tetralineata | Gokseong, Jeollanam-do, Korea | Boseong River | H16 | KC524528 | – |
|
|
C. melanoleuca | Huairou District, Beijing, China | Haihe River basin | H17 | – | This study |
|
|
C. melanoleuca | Huairou District, Beijing, China | Haihe River basin | H18 | – | This study |
| – | C. granoei | Melnikovo, Tomsk District, Russia | Ob River basin | H19 | KM583513 |
|
| – | C. granoei | Zhigalovo, Irkutsk District, Russia | Lena River basin | H20 | KM583532 |
|
|
|
C. gracilis | Ji’an City, Jilin Province, China | Yalu River basin | H21 | – | This study |
| – | C. gracilis | Linjiang City, Liaoning Province, China | Yalu River basin | H22 | KY009955 |
|
|
|
C. choii | Xinglong County, Hebei Province, China | Luanhe River basin | H23 | – | This study |
| – | C. choii | Yocheon, Jeollabuk-do, Korea | Geum River basin | H24 | EF508510 |
|
| – | Sabanejewia aurata | Georgia | Rioni River | – | AF499190 |
|
ModelFinder (
Holotype.
•
Paratypes.
Twenty-five specimens •
Counts and measurements of Cobitis beijingensis sp. nov. and Cobitis lutheri.
| Counts | Cobitis beijingensis sp. nov. | Cobitis lutheri | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holotype | All examined specimens includes types (n = 46) | All examined specimens (n = 34) | |||||||
| Mode and Range | n | Mode and Range | n | ||||||
| Branched dorsal-fin rays | 7 | 7 (6–7) | 40 | 7 (7) | 34 | ||||
| Branched anal-fin rays | 5 | 5 (5) | 40 | 5 (5) | 34 | ||||
| Branched pectoral-fin rays | 8 | 8 (7–9) | 40 | 8 (7–8) | 34 | ||||
| Branched pelvic-fin rays | 6 | 6 (5–7) | 40 | 6 (5–6) | 34 | ||||
| Prepelvic myotomes | 15 | 15 (14–18) | 39 | 12 (11–13) | 34 | ||||
| Vertebrae | 4+37 | 4+37 (36–38) | 11 | 4+39 (38–41) | 8 | ||||
| Measurements | Male | Male (n = 11) | Female (n = 15) | Male (n = 19) | Female (n = 15) | ||||
| Mean and Range | SD | Mean and Range | SD | Mean and Range | SD | Mean and Range | SD | ||
| Standard length (mm) | 55.0 | 55.0 (48.8–65.7) | – | 64.1 (57.1–71.1) | – | 54.8 (48.4–62.8) | – | 70.1 (53.8–87.3) | – |
| In percentage of SL % | |||||||||
| Body depth | 17.1 | 16.7 (12.6–19.8) | 2.0 | 16.4 (13.3–19.3) | 1.7 | 16.5 (14.2–18.8) | 1.2 | 16.5 (14.7–17.9) | 1.0 |
| Head length | 21.8 | 21.6 (19.7–25.0) | 1.5 | 20.3 (19.0–21.4) | 0.7 | 21.9 (20.2–23.9) | 1.2 | 21.3 (19.4–23.5) | 1.2 |
| Dorsal-fin length | 19.9 | 18.5 (14.8–20.8) | 1.9 | 17.3 (15.7–19.3) | 1.1 | 18.6 (16.3–20.8) | 1.4 | 17.0 (14.5–18.6) | 1.0 |
| Dorsal-fin base length | 10.5 | 10.8 (8.0–12.8) | 1.4 | 11.4 (8.3–13.5) | 1.2 | 10.5 (8.6–13.3) | 1.1 | 10.5 (9.4–12.6) | 0.9 |
| Pectoral-fin length | 19.4 | 18.4 (14.7–21.2) | 1.9 | 13.6 (12.1–16.3) | 1.2 | 17.1 (14.6–20.0) | 1.4 | 13.0 (10.7–15.7) | 1.0 |
| Pectoral-fin base length | 4.5 | 4.1 (2.6–5.3) | 0.9 | 3.1 (2.5–3.9) | 0.3 | 4.2 (3.5–5.0) | 0.4 | 3.4 (2.8–3.9) | 0.3 |
| Pelvic-fin length | 15.6 | 14.4 (12.0–16.1) | 1.4 | 11.5 (10.1–12.7) | 0.8 | 13.6 (11.1–15.1) | 1.1 | 11.3 (9.6–13.1) | 1.0 |
| Pelvic-fin base length | 3.8 | 3.5 (2.6–4.9) | 0.7 | 3.1 (2.5–3.9) | 0.4 | 3.4 (2.9–4.3) | 0.3 | 3.1 (2.8–3.9) | 0.3 |
| Anal-fin length | 14.7 | 14.0 (13.0–15.1) | 0.8 | 12.9 (11.2–14.6) | 1.0 | 15.3 (11.5–15.1) | 1.4 | 13.4 (12.8–14.6) | 0.6 |
| Anal-fin base length | 7.2 | 7.3 (5.3–8.5) | 0.9 | 7.7 (5.9–8.7) | 0.6 | 8.2 (6.5–10.3) | 1.0 | 8.0 (6.9–9.7) | 0.8 |
| Pre-dorsal length | 58.3 | 56.1 (41.3–61.1) | 5.4 | 56.9 (52.9–61.6) | 2.1 | 54.7 (52.4–56.8) | 1.5 | 54.9 (52.4–58.4) | 1.7 |
| Post-dorsal length | 44.2 | 45.6 (41.3–56.5) | 4.0 | 46.6 (42.6–50.5) | 2.1 | 47.2 (43.7–49.5) | 1.9 | 47.8 (43.1–50.6) | 1.8 |
| Pre-pectoral length | 23.0 | 23.7 (21.8–26.0) | 1.4 | 21.9 (21.0–23.8) | 0.9 | 24.1 (20.5–27.5) | 2.1 | 22.0 (19.5–24.2) | 1.6 |
| Pre-pelvic length | 60.5 | 61.3 (58.1–65.1) | 2.3 | 58.8 (53.5–63.1) | 2.5 | 53.7 (50.2–58.1) | 2.2 | 53.5 (49.7–55.9) | 1.6 |
| Pre-anal length | 85.1 | 85.0 (81.0–89.8) | 3.1 | 83.7 (80.0–88.3) | 2.2 | 81.8 (77.1–86.1) | 2.5 | 81.4 (78.6–84.8) | 2.0 |
| Caudal peduncle length | 8.0 | 10.1 (8.0–12.7) | 1.4 | 10.5 (8.6–13.5)) | 1.5 | 11.1 (8.9–13.1) | 1.3 | 10.8 (9.5–13.6) | 1.1 |
| Caudal peduncle depth | 10.4 | 9.9 (8.0–11.3) | 1.0 | 9.3 (8.6–10.0) | 0.4 | 9.2 (8.0–11.0) | 0.7 | 9.0 (7.6–10.0) | 0.7 |
| Head length (mm) | 12.0 | 11.8 (11.0–12.9) | – | 19.6 (12.6–26.6) | – | 12.0 (10.6–13.6) | – | 14.9 (12.2–17.7) | – |
| In percentage of HL % | |||||||||
| Head depth | 62.0 | 61.7 (56.5–66.8) | 3.3 | 62.2 (57.2–68.3) | 3.2 | 62.1 (57.1–71.9) | 3.3 | 61.1 (54.7–69.1) | 4.0 |
| Head width | 40.5 | 43.1 (35.2–52.7) | 6.0 | 44.0 (37.1–51.7) | 3.8 | 42.5 (35.8–49.5) | 4.3 | 45.6 (37.7–56.1) | 5.2 |
| Eye diameter | 15.8 | 16.8 (14.2–20.3) | 2.2 | 13.3 (11.2–16.7) | 1.5 | 17.6 (14.0–22.2) | 2.4 | 15.3 (12.0–17.9) | 1.9 |
| Interorbital width | 27.9 | 24.2 (18.3–28.1) | 3.8 | 23.1 (19.9–27.8) | 1.9 | 21.5 (16.6–26.8) | 2.6 | 22.2 (15.9–27.5) | 3.2 |
| Snout length | 43.9 | 43.2 (36.9–49.3) | 3.4 | 46.9 (41.7–50.1) | 2.2 | 39.6 (35.6–45.4) | 2.6 | 42.7 (37.7–48.1) | 3.2 |
Twenty-five specimens •
The new species can be distinguished by the combination of the following characters: Lamina circularis on pectoral fin elongated, posterior margin slightly serrated; 14–18 (mode 15) prepelvic myotomes; pelvic fin inserted below 3rd–5th branched dorsal-fin ray; total vertebrae 4+ 36–38 (mode 37); the second Gambetta line (L2) does not exist or is fused with the first line (L1).
Body elongated, laterally compressed. Dorsal body profile rising smoothly from nostrils to occiput, almost horizontal between occiput and dorsal-fin insertion, gradually sloping along dorsal-fin base, then horizontally extending to caudal-fin base. Maximum body depth at dorsal-fin origin, body depth 12.6–19.8% of standard length. Lower surface of head flattened, abdomen rounded. Caudal peduncle short, depth almost equal to length, laterally compressed, with fleshy keels on dorsal and ventral sides. Head length greater than body depth (101.0–156.7% of head length); snout elongated and blunt, snout length 36.9–50.1% of head length; eye small, 11.2–20.3% of head length, superior and laterally positioned, near gill opening than tip of snout; nostrils positioned close together, anterior nostril with short tube; interorbital region ridged and narrow. Anus positioned near anal-fin insertion.
Mouth inferior, lips fleshy. Upper lip without affiliated apparatus; lower lip two lobed, medial side elongate-oval shaped. Three pairs of barbels: rostral barbels shorter than maxillary and mandibular barbels; maxillary barbels length equal to mandibular barbels length; mandibular barbels not or almost reaching under the anterior edge of the orbit.
Body covered with tiny cycloid scales. Prepelvic myotomes 14 (3 specimen), 15 (26), 16(7), 17(2), 18(1).
Dorsal fin with three unbranched and six (1) or seven (39) branched rays; distal margin slightly convex, inserted nearer to caudal-fin base than snout. Pectoral fin with one unbranched and seven (3), eight (32) or nine (5) branched rays. Pelvic fin with one unbranched and five (1), six (38) or seven (1) branched rays, inserted below third to fifth branched dorsal-fin ray. Anal fin with 3 unbranched and 5 (40) branched rays; inserted nearer to caudal-fin base than to pelvic-fin insertion. Caudal fin slightly truncated, with one unbranched principle ray and seven branched principle rays on upper part and seven branched principle rays and one unbranched principal ray on lower part.
Total vertebrae 4+36 (1), 37 (6), 38 (4). Suborbital spine bifurcated (Fig.
Dorsal side of head and body yellowish brown, mid-lateral side light yellowish brown, ventral side grayish white. A clear black stripe or “tear mark” runs from tip of snout, crossing the eye, to the occiput; two dark grey stripes distributed parallel to the clear black stripe, one on the dorsal side of the head; one runs across the nostrils; several vague and irregular patterns located under the eye and opercula, sometimes forming one or two grey stripes parallel to the clear black stripe. Four obvious lines of Gambetta’s pattern. The L1 of Gambetta’s pattern on the dorsal of body, 7–10 black blotches before dorsal-fin insertion, 7–11 black blotches after dorsal-fin base end; L2 not exist or fused with L1; L3 linear, interrupted into several small irregular blotches and fused with L1 at caudal peduncle; L4 linear, consisted of many tiny spots; L5 obvious, extending along the mid-lateral side of body, consisted of 9–15 different sized black blotches, sometimes connected with each other with black strip. Three or four rows of pigmentation on dorsal-fin rays; three or four arcuate black bars on caudal fin. One big jet-black oval-shaped spot on upper caudal-fin base, size comparable to the eye diameter (Fig.
Dorsal side of head and body yellow, mid-lateral side light yellow, ventral side pale. All patterns same position as living specimen.
Males with elongated lamina circularis derived from the base of the first branched pectoral-fin ray; tip of the lamina circularis almost reaching the mid-point of the first branched ray; posterior margin of the lamina circularis usually serrated (Fig.
Based on our field collections and the historic specimens, Cobitis beijingensis is distributed in the Haihe River basin in northern China, including rivers in Beijing and the Baiyangdian Lake in Hebei Province. This species can be currently found in the Chaobaihe River system in Huairou and Miyun District, Beijing (Fig.
This species usually inhabits slow-flowing water or still water with plenty of submerged plants or filamentous algae. The benthic microhabitat is usually sand and silt mixed with some gravel. Coexisting species include Rhodeus ocellatus, Carassius auratus, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus, Oryzias latipes, Rhinogobius giurinus, etc.
The species name “beijingensis” was referred to the type locality of this species, Beijing, the capital city of China. The Chinese name for the new species is “北京花鳅”.
A total of 24 haplotypes from 30 Cobitis individuals were included in the analyses. The molecular phylogenetic results (BI and ML trees in Fig.
Genetic distances of the Cyt b gene computed by MEGA 6.0 amongst nine analyzed species of Cobitis, Sabanejewia aurata was used as the outgroup.
| Intraspecific | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C. beijingensis sp. nov. | 0.002 | |||||||||
| 2 | C. lutheri | 0.005 | 0.131 | ||||||||
| 3 | C. nalbanti | 0.006 | 0.123 | 0.125 | |||||||
| 4 | C. hankugensis | 0 | 0.100 | 0.098 | 0.083 | ||||||
| 5 | C. tetralineata | 0 | 0.118 | 0.121 | 0.039 | 0.080 | |||||
| 6 | C. choii | 0.006 | 0.157 | 0.177 | 0.172 | 0.175 | 0.161 | ||||
| 7 | C. melanoleuca | 0.003 | 0.171 | 0.176 | 0.164 | 0.164 | 0.153 | 0.128 | |||
| 8 | C. gracilis | 0.006 | 0.158 | 0.171 | 0.161 | 0.166 | 0.155 | 0.124 | 0.077 | ||
| 9 | C. granoei | 0.004 | 0.175 | 0.181 | 0.162 | 0.165 | 0.156 | 0.130 | 0.015 | 0.076 | |
| 10 | S. aurata (Outgroup) | NA | 0.195 | 0.198 | 0.201 | 0.188 | 0.191 | 0.209 | 0.191 | 0.194 | 0.198 |
The new species can be distinguished from the majority of the congeners in southern China by having elongated and serrated lamina circularis, except for Cobitis microcephala Chen & Chen, 2011. However, C. beijingensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from it by having a different Gambetta pattern (L2 does not exist or is fused with L1 vs. L2 possessing numerous irregular dots; Fig.
Cobitis beijingensis is morphologically similar to C. lutheri, which has distributions in northern China, Russia, and North Korea (
Although Cobitis melanoleuca and C. beijingensis are all distributed in Beijing, they seem to inhabit different habitats. The former is commonly seen in the mountainous rivers where the water bodies have a certain flow velocity, usually sandy bottomed with pebbles and gravels and fewer aquatic plants. The new species, however, exists in the plain rivers or lakes where the water slows or stills, usually with plenty of aquatic plants as described above. There are several lots of specimens collected in the 1930s from different localities in Beijing, most of which were located in the plain region (Fig.
Cobitis melanoleuca
: Twelve specimens.
Cobitis lutheri
: Thirty-eight specimens.
Cobitis choii
: One specimen.
Cobitis gracilis
: Eleven specimens.
Cobitis granoei
: Ten specimens.
Cobitis microcephala
: Two specimens.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-32270464) and Sino BON – Inland Water Fish Diversity Observation Network.
Sun ZX contributed to the field collection, photographing, illustrating, specimen examining, data analysis, and drafting of the manuscript. Li XY contributed to specimens examining. Li XJ, Hao JY, and Sheng D contributed to field collection. Zhao YH was responsible for review and editing.
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.
We appreciate Dr. Ying-Nan Wang and Xiao-Wei Meng from the National Animal Collection Resource Center, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (