Research Article |
Corresponding author: Li-Na Du ( dulina@mailbox.gxnu.edu.cn ) Corresponding author: Xiao-Yong Chen ( chenxy@mail.kiz.ac.cn ) Academic editor: Nicolas Hubert
© 2025 Mei Liu, Jian-Bing Lyu, Li-Na Du, Xiao-Yong Chen.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Liu M, Lyu J-B, Du L-N, Chen X-Y (2025) Description of a new loach species, Yunnanilus triangulus sp. nov. (Cypriniformes, Nemacheilidae), from Yunnan, China. Zoosystematics and Evolution 101(2): 465-471. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.101.136965
|
A new species of the genus Yunnanilus, designated Yunnanilus triangulus sp. nov., is described from the Nanpan River in Yunnan Province, southwestern China. Nuptial males of this species are distinguished by the presence of tubercles on the caudal peduncle during the reproductive period, a feature not observed in other members of the genus. The new species is further characterized by the following unique combination of morphological characters: body scaled, smaller eyes than interorbital width, nine inner gill rakers on first gill arch, lateral head length 27.1%–30.9% SL, head width 14.3%–17.2% SL, eye diameter 19.6%–23.8% of lateral head length, and caudal peduncle depth 94.0%–130.6% of its length. Morphological and molecular evidence support the validity of this species, despite its geographic proximity to Y. polylepis. These findings underscore the ecological specialization that exists within the genus Yunnanilus and highlight the urgent need for species-specific conservation strategies, given their restricted distributions and dependence on specific habitats.
Caudal peduncle with tubercles, freshwater fish, morphological characters, sexual dimorphism
Currently, Yunnanilus comprises 20 valid species, all restricted to lakes, marshes, and slow-flowing waters within Yunnan and Sichuan Provinces of southwestern China (
In April 2018, eight specimens of Yunnanilus were collected from a tributary of the Nanpan River in Huaning County, Yuxi City, Yunnan Province, China. Morphological and molecular analyses confirmed that these specimens represent a previously undescribed member of the genus, which is herein described and compared with all known congeners.
All care and handling of experimental animals complied with the relevant laws of the Chinese Laboratory of Animal Welfare and Ethics (GB/T 35892-2018). Upon their collection, all specimens were rapidly euthanized by an overdose of anesthetic clove oil. The right-side pelvic fins of five individuals were removed and preserved in 99% ethanol for molecular analyses, and eight individuals were stored in 10% formalin for morphological comparisons. The specimens were deposited in the Kunming Natural History Museum of Zoology, Kunming Institute of Zoology (
All counts and measurements followed the methodology described by
• KIZ2018002410 female, 51.8 mm standard length (SL), Dalongtan Spring, Wangma Village, Huaning County, Yuxi City, Yunnan, P.R. China; Nanpan River, 24.1716°N, 102.9182°E, 1619 m a.s.l., X.Y. Chen, L.L. Xu, and H.D. Lyu, collected April 2018.
• Seven specimens. Female: KIZ2018002404, 2406–2407, 2409, 2411, 38.9–54.6 mm SL; Male: KIZ2018002405, KIZ2018002408, 37.1–39.1 mm SL; same as holotype.
The specific name triangulus is derived from the unique presence of a tubercle on the caudal peduncle in nuptial males, a character not previously recorded in the genus Yunnanilus. We suggest the Chinese vernacular name “三角云南鳅” and the English vernacular name “triangle Yunnan loach.” Gender: masculine.
The new species can be distinguished from all other members of the genus by the presence of a unique triangular tubercle on the male caudal peduncle. It shares a body covered by scales, except on head and thorax, with Y. chuanheensis, Y. jiuchiensis, Y. longibulla, Y. macrogaster, Y. macrolepis, Y. parvus, Y. pleurotaenia, Y. polylepis, and Y. spanisbripes. However, the new species can be readily differentiated from these congeners by the following combination of characters: eye diameter shorter than interorbital width (vs. longer in Y. jiuchiensis and Y. longibulla), outer gill raker absent (vs. present in Y. macrolepis and Y. spanisbripes), processus dentiformis absent (vs. present in Y. macrogaster, Y. parvus, and Y. pleurotaenia), six branched pelvic-fin rays (vs. seven or eight in Y. chuanheensis), eight branched dorsal-fin rays (vs. nine in Y. polylepis), and specific metric characters.
All morphometric and meristic data are given in Table
Characters | Holotype | Paratypes (mean ± SD) | |
---|---|---|---|
Females (N = 5) | Males (N = 2) | ||
Total length (mm) | 51.8 | 49.6–67.3 (55.6 ± 7.0) | 47.8–49.3 (48.6 ± 1.1) |
Standard length (mm) | 40.8 | 38.9–54.6 (44.1 ± 6.1) | 37.1–39.1 (38.1 ± 1.4) |
Percent of standard length (%) | |||
Deepest body depth | 20.4 | 21.6–23.1 (22.1 ± 0.6) | 20.9–21.2 (21.1 ± 0.2) |
Head width | 15.5 | 15.0–17.2 (15.7 ± 0.9) | 14.3–14.4 (14.3 ± 0.0) |
Lateral head length | 27.7 | 27.1–29.0 (28.3 ± 0.8) | 29.9–30.9 (30.4 ± 0.7) |
Predorsal length | 54.9 | 51.3–55.4 (53.8 ± 1.8) | 53.6–54.8 (54.2 ± 0.8) |
Prepelvic length | 55.8 | 55.8–59.9 (58.1 ± 1.5) | 56.9–57.7 (57.3 ± 0.5) |
Preanal length | 78.7 | 80.4–82.0 (81.4 ± 0.7) | 80.2–81.7 (80.9 ± 1.1) |
Preanus length | 75.5 | 77.0–78.4 (77.5 ± 0.6) | 77.1–77.2 (77.1 ± 0.1) |
Caudal-peduncle length | 13.0 | 9.4–12.1 (10.7 ± 1.0) | 10.9–11.8 (11.3 ± 0.6) |
Caudal-peduncle depth | 12.2 | 11.5–12.8 (12.1 ± 0.5) | 11.4–12.1 (11.8 ± 0.5) |
Percent of Lateral head length (%) | |||
Head width | 56.1 | 53.2–59.3 (55.5 ± 2.5) | 46.2–48.0 (47.1 ± 1.2) |
Head depth | 60.0 | 55.1–60.9 (57.4 ± 2.2) | 49.6–56.9 (53.2 ± 5.2) |
Eye diameter | 22.8 | 19.6–23.8 (21.0 ± 1.6) | 21.3–21.4 (21.4 ± 0.0) |
Interorbital width | 23.9 | 21.3–27.4 (24.0 ± 2.2) | 22.7–23.0 (22.8 ± 0.2) |
Snout length | 31.5 | 31.7–38.1 (35.1 ± 2.4) | 31.2–35.2 (33.2 ± 2.8) |
Percent of Caudal-peduncle length (%) | |||
Caudal-peduncle depth | 94.0 | 105.9–130.6 (113.1 ± 10.2) | 102.5–104.9 (103.7 ± 1.7) |
Percent of distance between pectoral-fin origin and pelvic-fin origin | |||
Pectoral-fin length | 73.8 | 56.9–76.5 (66.9 ± 8.0) | 89.0–92.0 (90.5 ± 2.1) |
Percent of distance between pelvic-fin origin and anal-fin origin | |||
Pelvic-fin length | 69.1 | 53.2–66.1 (61.5 ± 5.5) | 74.1–76.6 (75.4 ± 1.8) |
Dorsal-fin rays | 3, 8 | 3, 8 | 3, 8 |
Pectoral-fin rays | 1, 10 | 1, 10–11 | 1, 10–11 |
Pelvic-fin rays | 1, 6 | 1, 6 | 1, 6 |
Anal-fin rays | 2, 5 | 2, 5 | 2, 5 |
Branched caudal-fin rays | 16 | 15–17 | 16 |
Body densely scaled, except head and thorax; scales more numerous and larger in males from pectoral to pelvic-fin insertion. Three pairs of barbels, two rostral pairs and one maxillary pair, length of inner rostral barbel one half of outer rostral barbel, reaching anterior nostril; outer rostral barbel reaching posterior nostril, and maxillary barbel reaching posterior margin of eye. Processus dentiformis on upper jaw absent.
Dorsal fin with three unbranched and eight branched rays, origin closer to caudal-fin base than to snout tip, predorsal length 51.3–55.4% SL. Pectoral fin with one unbranched and 10–11 branched rays. Pelvic fin with one unbranched and six branched rays, origin posterior to dorsal fin origin, tips of adpressed fin not reaching anus, longer in males than females (74.1%–76.6% of distance between pelvic-fin insertion and anal-fin origin vs. 53.2%–69.1% in females). Anal fin with two unbranched and five branched rays, origin closer to anus and distant from caudal fin. Caudal fin with two unbranched and 15–17 branched rays (mostly 16). Series of temporal tubercles present on caudal peduncle in nuptial males. Lateral line incomplete, terminating between tip of pectoral fin and dorsal fin origin. 9–11 inner gill rakers on first gill arch. Cephalic lateral system with 12–15+3 infraorbital canal pores, 7–9 supraorbital canal pores, 6–8 supratemporal canal pores, and 6–10 preoperculomandibular canal pores.
Stomach U-shaped (Fig.
In life, head and trunk with light golden background color. Ventral head and abdomen surface without color pattern. In females, trunk with 15–17 long and twisted dark brown saddles, connected together on dorsal. Some bars bifurcated (Fig.
Series of temporal tubercles present on caudal peduncle in nuptial male individuals (Fig.
Yunnanilus triangulus sp. nov. is currently only known from Dalongtan Spring, Wangma Village, Huaning County, Yuxi City, Yunnan, China; Nanpan River (24.1716°N, 102.9182°E, 1619 m a.s.l.). The habitat comprises a deep pool, approximately 3 m in depth and characterized by abundant macrophytes (Fig.
In total, 1746 base pairs (670 bp for COI and 1 076 bp for Cyt b) from Yunnanilus triangulus sp. nov. were amplified and analyzed in this study. These sequences were used for molecular phylogenetic analysis together with 37 complete mitochondrial genomes, 25 Cyt b sequences, and 21 COI sequences from GenBank. Parabotia fasciata Dabry de Thiersant, 1872, and Leptobotia elongata (Bleeker, 1870), two botiid species, served as the outgroups. Given that the BI and ML analyses produced nearly identical topologies, only the BI tree with BPPs and bootstrap support (BS) values is presented (Fig.
The uncorrected p-distances of the Cyt b and COI genes between Yunnanilus triangulus sp. nov. and the other six species ranged from 1.19% to 7.5% (average 3.13%). The maximum and minimum uncorrected p-distances were found between Y. yangi and Y. polylepis and between Y. analis and Y. pleurotaenia, respectively (Table
Uncorrected p-distances (%) between nine species in the genus Eonemachilus and Yunnanilus based on mitochondrial COI and Cyt b genes.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Eonemachilus niger | ||||||||
2 | E. longidorsalis | 8.14 | |||||||
3 | Yunnanilus yangi | 9.64 | 12.08 | ||||||
4 | Y. polylepis | 9.17 | 10.64 | 9.44 | |||||
5 | Y. triangulus | 8.53 | 9.79 | 7.54 | 4.34 | ||||
6 | Y. jiuchiensis | 6.76 | 7.88 | 7.29 | 3.88 | 1.89 | |||
7 | Y. chuanheensis | 9.99 | 11.33 | 6.66 | 5.89 | 2.43 | 2.77 | ||
8 | Y. pleurotaenia | 8.55 | 10.20 | 7.42 | 4.18 | 1.19 | 1.86 | 2.03 | |
9 | Y. analis | 6.89 | 7.82 | 7.46 | 4.35 | 1.37 | 2.26 | 2.32 | 0.05 |
Molecular analysis unequivocally placed Yunnanilus triangulus sp. nov. within the genus Yunnanilus. This placement was further corroborated by several morphological features characteristic of the genus, including mouth inferior, lateral and cephalic lateral line pores present, anterior and posterior nostrils separated, an anterior nostril tube-shaped, and a tip not elongated into a barbel-like structure (
The description of this new species increases the total number of Yunnanilus species native to the Yangtze, Pearl, and Red River basins to 21. Notably, Yunnanilus triangulus sp. nov. can be distinguished based on a combination of morphological characteristics related to the presence of scales, relative sizes of the eye diameter and interorbital width, absence of a processus dentiformis, lack of an outer gill raker on the first gill arch, and the specific number of branched caudal fin rays. The genus Yunnanilus can be broadly divided into two morphological groups based on the presence or absence of body scales. The ‘scaleless’ group contains Y. analis, Y. beipanjiangensis, Y. chui, Y. discoloris, Y. forkicaudalis, Y. paludosus, and Y. yangi, while the ‘scaled’ group includes the new species together with Y. chuanheensis, Y. elakatis, Y. jiuchiensis, Y. longibulla, Y. macrogaster, Y. macrolepis, Y. macrositanus, Y. nanpanjiangensis, Y. parvus, Y. pleurotaenia, Y. polylepis, Y. sichuanensis, and Y. spanisbripes. However, Yunnanilus triangulus sp. nov. can be distinguished from Y. elakatis, Y. macrositanus, Y. nanpanjiangensis, and Y. sichuanensis by whole body covered by scales, except head and thorax (vs. scales present only on caudal peduncle), from Y. longibulla and Y. jiuchiensis by eye diameter shorter than interorbital width (vs. longer), from Y. parvus, Y. macrogaster, Y. pleurotaenia, Y. macrolepis, Y. spanisbripes, and Y. longibulla by processus dentiformis absent (vs. present), from Y. macrolepis and Y. spanisbripes by outer gill raker on first gill arch absent (vs. present), and from Y. polylepis by body depth 20.0%–23.0% SL (vs. 15.0%–20.0%) and caudal peduncle depth 94.0%–131.0% of its length (vs. 73.0%–89.0%).
Sexual dimorphism is a common characteristic in members of the family Nemacheilidae. For example, males of the genus Oreonectes develop genital papillae posterior to the anus (
Species of Yunnanilus are typically confined to small water bodies rich in submerged macrophytes, environments highly vulnerable to anthropogenic impacts and pollution. In September 2024, a survey of the type locality of Yunnanilus triangulus sp. nov. revealed that the species had disappeared in the pond, likely due to the rapid decline of submerged macrophytes and the introduction of large numbers of carp into the habitat. The sensitivity of Yunnanilus to water pollution, invasive species, and predation has led to consistent population declines across its range. These findings underscore the urgent need for targeted conservation strategies to safeguard Yunnanilus species and other freshwater fish in this ecologically significant karst region. It is hoped that this report will stimulate further research and conservation initiatives to address the growing threats faced by freshwater ecosystems in southwestern China.
The electronic version of this article in portable document format represents a published work according to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN); hence the new name contained in the electronic version is effectively published under the Code from the electronic edition alone (see Articles 8.5–8.6 of the Code). This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) and can be resolved and the associated information can be viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix http://zoobank.org/.
M.L. and L.-N.D. measured the specimens, analyzed the data, conceived and designed the study, and prepared the manuscript, J.-B.L. analyzed the molecular data and constructed the phylogenetic tree. X.-Y.C. provided conceptualization and funding acquisition for the field survey and resources. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
This study was funded by the Project of the Innovation Team of Survey and Assessment of the Pearl River Fishery Resources (2023TD-10), Guangxi Natural Science Foundation Project (2022GXNSFAA035563), Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, China (ERESEP2022Z05), and the Position of Bioclassonomist of Chinese Academy of Sciences (