Research Article
Print
Research Article
A new species of Yunnanilus (Cypriniformes, Nemacheilidae) from Yunnan, southwest China
expand article infoZhi-Xian Qin§, Wei-han Shao|, Li-Na Du§, Zhen-Xing Wang
‡ Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Guilin, China
§ Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China
| Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China
¶ Guangxi Lujin Ecological Technology Company, Nanning, China
Open Access

Abstract

A new species of Yunnanilus is described from the Nanpanjiang River, Yunnan, China. The new species, Yunnanilus polylepis, can be distinguished from other species of Yunnanilus by the following combination of characteristics: Processus dentiformis absent; eye diameter smaller than interorbital width; outer gill raker absent and 10 inner gill rakers on first gill arch; whole trunk covered by scales; nine branched dorsal-fin rays; 10 or 11 branched pectoral-fin rays; six branched pelvic-fin rays. Despite our phylogenetic analysis, which sheds light on the complex relationships among Yunnanilus species, the majority of Yunnanilus species are restricted to more localized environments and habitats. It is urgent to address the environmental threats that jeopardize their survival, especially given their generally restricted distribution.

Key Words

Loach, mitochondrial gene, morphology, Nanpanjiang River, taxonomy

Introduction

Species belonging to the genus Yunnanilus Nichols, 1925 are primarily found in lakes, marshes, and slow-flowing waters, exhibiting an affinity for karstic regions, particularly in the Yunnan and Sichuan provinces of China (Du et al. 2021). Kottelat and Chu (1988), who identified eight valid species and six previously undescribed species from the Yunnan Plateau. Subsequently, Yang and Chen (1995) divided the species of Yunnanilus into the Y. nigromaculatus and Y. pleurotaenia species groups based on the absence or presence of lateral line and cephalic lateral line canals, respectively. Prokofiev (2010) classified the family Nemacheilidae into five tribes, i.e., Lefuini, Nemacheilini, Triplophysini, Vaillantellini, and Yunnanilini. However, the monophyly of the Yunnanilini tribe was not supported in subsequent studies, with Du et al. (2021) and Luo et al. (2023) revising the classification of Yunnanilini using both morphological characteristics and molecular evidence, resulting in the placement of the Y. nigromaculatus group into Eonemachilus Berg, 1938, Y. pulcherrimus Yang, Chen & Lan, 2004 into Micronemacheilus Rendahl, 1944, Y. retrodorsalis (Lan, Yang & Chen, 1995) into Troglonectes Zhang & Zhao, 2016, and Y. jinxiensis Zhu, Du & Chen, 2009 into Paranemachilus Zhu, 1983. In addition, Du et al. (2023) delineated the phylogenetic relationships among Chinese nemacheilids possessing tube-shaped anterior nostrils, categorizing the spatial relationship between the anterior and posterior nostrils into three distinct types, i.e., separated, adjacent, and closely set. Within this framework, Du et al. (2023) described a new genus, Guinemachilus Du et al., 2023, into which Y. bailianensis Yang, 2013 and Y. longibarbatus Gan, Chen & Yang, 2007 were placed. Subsequently, He et al. (2024) described a new species, Yunnanilus Yangi He et al., 2024, from Nanpan Jiang based on morphological and molecular data. Currently, 19 species of Yunnanilus have been recognized, with diagnostic characters including inferior mouth, anterior and posterior nostrils separated, anterior nostril base tube-shaped and tip without elongated barbel-like structure, and lateral line and cephalic lateral-line canals present (Kottelat and Chu 1988; Du et al. 2021, 2023).

In November 2023, 13 Yunnanilus specimens were collected from a tributary of the Nanpanjiang River in Huaning County, Yuxi City, Yunnan Province, China. Based on morphological characteristics and molecular evidence, these specimens represent a previously undescribed species of Yunnanilus. Herein, we provide a description of the new species and its comparison to congeners.

Materials and methods

All care and use of experimental animals complied with the relevant laws of the Chinese Laboratory of Animal Welfare and Ethics (GB/T 35892-2018). Specimens were rapidly euthanized by an overdose of anesthetic clove oil soon after being collected. Five specimens were preserved in 99% ethanol for molecular analyses, and eight specimens were stored in 10% formalin for morphological study. Specimens were deposited in the unming Natural History Museum of Zoology, Kunming Institute of Zoology (KIZ), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS).

All counts and measurements followed Kottelat (1990). The data were initially processed using Excel software for preliminary statistical analysis. Genomic DNA was extracted from fins fixed in ethanol. Partial sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and cytochrome b (cyt b) were sequenced by Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (China). All sequences were assembled by Seqman in the DNAstar software package and aligned in MEGA v11.0 (Tamura et al. 2021). Sequences have been submitted to GenBank (Accession Nos. PP254216–254236 for COI, PP262976–62996 for cyt b). The phylogenetic position of Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov. was determined by maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods, which were implemented in the CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al. 2010). The ML was constructed in RAxML-HPC v8 (Stamatakis 2014). Selected was the rapid bootstrapping configuration, and the bootstrapping iterations were 1000. The BI tree was conducted by MrBayes in XSEDE v3.2.7a (Ronquist et al. 2012). Two runs were performed simultaneously with four Markov chains starting from a random tree. The chains were run for five million generations and sampled every 100 generations. The first 25% of sampled trees were discarded as burn-in, and the remaining trees were used to create a consensus tree and estimate Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPPs). The constructed phylogenetic trees were viewed and edited by FigTree v1.4.4 (Rambaut 2009).

Results

Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov.

Type materials

Holotype. KIZ2023000009 (Kunming Natural History Museum of Zoology, KIZ, CAS), female, 43.7 mm standard length (SL), Qixitan Park, Panxi Town, Huaning County, Yuxi City, Yunnan, P. R China; Nanpanjiang River; 24.2434°N, 103.1221°E, C.S. Yang collected in November 2023.

Paratypes. Seven specimens. KIZ2023000010–14, female, 31.9–37.1 mm SL, KIZ2023000039–40, male, 30.3–31.8 mm SL; same as holotype.

Other materials

DLN20230180–184, preserved in 99% ethanol for molecular study, same as type specimens.

Etymology

The specific name polylepis is derived from the characteristic of being entirely covered by scales Gender: Masculine. We suggest the Chinese and English common names as “多鳞云南鳅” and “densely scaled Yunnan loach,” respectively.

Diagnosis

The new species is distinguished from all other members of the genus based on the following characters: whole trunk covered by scales; processus dentiformis absent; eye diameter smaller than interorbital width; nine branched dorsal-fin rays; 10 or 11 branched pectoral-fin rays; six branched pelvic-fin rays; outer gill raker absent and 10 inner gill rakers on first gill arch.

Description

Morphometric and meristic data are given in Table 1. Whole trunk covered with small and dense tubercles. Greatest body depth anterior to dorsal-fin origin, posterior portion gradually compressed from dorsal-fin to caudal-fin base. Head length longer than depth and deeper than width. Snout slightly blunt, shorter than postorbital length of head. Eye diameter smaller than interorbital width, posterior nostril closer to anterior margin of eye than to tip of snout; anterior and posterior nostrils separated, distance greater than diameter of posterior nostril, base of anterior nostril tube-shaped, not elongated to barbel-like (Fig. 1I).

Table 1.

Morphometric and meristic data of Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov.

Characters Holotype Paratypes (Mean±SD)
Total length (mm) 53.8 38.1–45.6 (42.2±2.8)
Standard length (mm) 43.7 30.3–37.1 (33.9±2.6)
Percent of standard length (%)
Deepest body depth 15.7 16.3–19.6 (17.6±1.1)
Head width 13.4 12.6–15.7 (13.9±1.1)
Lateral head length 25.2 25.2–28.2 (26.5±1.0)
Prepelvic length 54.3 52.5–55.9 (54.3±1.4)
Preanal length 75.4 72.9–78.4 (76.0±2.1)
Preanus length 71.9 70.1–77.3 (73.7±2.3)
Caudal-peduncle length 12.5 11.6–13.7 (13.0±0.8)
Caudal-peduncle depth 10.1 10.0–11.5 (10.6±0.6)
Percent of lateral head length (%)
Head width 53.0 49.9–57.7 (52.4±2.9)
Head depth 57.4 51.5–62.4 (57.9±4.1)
Eye diameter 19.6 16.7–27.0 (21.8±3.3)
Interorbital width 27.0 23.9–32.9 (29.4±3.0)
Snout length 39.4 31.1–41.7 (37.7±4.2)
Percent of caudal-peduncle length (%)
Caudal-peduncle depth 80.8 73.2–88.7 (81.8±5.6)
Dorsal-fin rays iv, 9 iv, 9
Pectoral-fin rays i, 11 i, 10–11
Pelvic-fin rays i, 6 i, 6
Anal-fin rays iii, 5 iii, 5
Branched caudal-fin rays 16 15
Figure 1. 

Morphometric characters of Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov. A–C. Lateral, dorsal, and ventral views of female, holotype KIZ2023000009; D–F. Lateral, dorsal, and ventral views of male, paratype KIZ2023000041; G–H. Living photo of female and male; I. Location of anterior and posterior nostrils.

Body densely scaled except for head and thorax; pectoral-fin origin to pelvic-fin origin covered by smaller and sparse scales. Upper jaw processus dentiformis absent. Three pairs of barbels, two rostral pairs and one maxillary pair; inner rostral barbel reaching posterior nostril; outer rostral barbel reaching anterior margin of eye; maxillary barbel reaching posterior margin of eye.

Dorsal fin with four unbranched and nine branched rays; origin nearer to snout tip than to base of caudal fin; pectoral fin with one unbranched and 10 or 11 branched rays (mostly 10), inserted immediately anterior to vertical through posteriormost point of operculum; pelvic fin with one unbranded and six branched rays, tips of pelvic fin not reaching anus; anal fin with three unbranched and five branched rays, origin closer to anus; caudal fin emarginate, with 15 or 16 branched rays (mostly 15). Ten inner gill rakers, without outer gill rakers on the first gill arch; lateral line incomplete, with 15–20 lateral line pores, reaching between tip of pectoral-fin and dorsal-fin origin; cephalic lateral system with 13–14+3 infraorbital canal pores, 7–9 supraorbital canal pores, 6–8 supratemporal canal pores, and 9–10 preoperculomandibular canal pores.

Stomach U-shaped, intestine long and straight (Fig. 2B). Swim bladder divided into two chambers, anterior chamber covered by dumbbell-shaped bony capsule, posterior chamber developed, connected with anterior chamber by slender tube, tube length about half of posterior chamber length (Fig. 2A).

Figure 2. 

The air baldde (A), stomach and intestine (B), KIZ 2023000010, and tubercles on the trunk (C), KIZ2023000011 of Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov.

Coloration

In life, both sexes, head and trunk with grayish background color. Lower margin of eye to dorsal head surface dark brown, dorsal head with heart-shaped dark brown pattern, ventral head surface without color pattern. Predorsal trunk with five or six dark brown blotches, larger width than interspace. Four or five dark brown blotches after dorsal fin. Two elliptical, dark brown spots at base of dorsal fin, two dark brown spots at base of caudal fin. Fin rays with dark pigments, fin membrane hyaline. In females, upper line of flank with 12–14 dark brown large spots (Fig. 1G). In males, body with black longitudinal stripe on both sides (Fig. 1H). In formalin-fixed specimens, lateral stripe and blotches somewhat faded, body generally light yellow.

Distribution and habitat

Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov. is currently only known from Qixitan Park, Panxi Town, Huaning County, Yuxi City, Yunnan, China; Nanpanjiang River (24.2434°N, 103.1221°E). This species inhabits a deep pool with water depths ranging from 3 to 8 m, characterized by a rich presence of macrophytes (Fig. 3). Other fish species present in the pool include Discogobio brachyphysallidos and Sinocyclocheilus sp. Despite its confined distribution, the population of Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov. remains stable, largely due to the enforcement of a fishing ban within the park.

Figure 3. 

Type locality of Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov. A. Distribution map; B. Habitat photo of the type locality at the time of collection.

Genetic comparisons

Of the 1737 bp in combined alignment, Y. polylepis sp. nov. and Y. pleurotaenia were amplified in this study. These sequences were used for molecular phylogenetic analysis together with 34 complete mitochondrial genomes and six cyt b sequences from GenBank. Parabotia fasciata Dabry de Thiersant, 1872 and Leptobotia elongata (Bleeker, 1870), two botiid species, were used as outgroups. Given that BI and ML analyses produced overall identical topologies, only the BI tree with Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) and bootstrap support (BS) values are presented here (Fig. 4). The phylogenetic tree strongly supports samples of Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov. to group into Yunnanilus. Furthermore, Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov. was identified as a sister to the clade containing Y. analis, Y. chuanheensis, Y. jiuchiensis, and Y. pleurotaenia (BPP = 1; BS = 100). However, the molecular phylogenies do not support the monophyly of Yunnanilus. Yunnanilus yangi was weakly supported to be a sister group to Eonemachilus (BPP = 59; BS = 61), and then claded together with those specimens of Yunnanilus (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. 

Bayesian phylogram of Yunnanilus based on a concatenated dataset of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and cytochrome b (cyt b) sequences. The numbers on the branches represent BPPs from BI and bootstrap supports from ML.

Key to species of the genus Yunnanilus

1 Body scaleless 2
Body covered by scales 7
2 Caudal fin forked 3
Caudal fin emarginated 4
3 Outer gill raker present on first gill arch Y. forkicaudalis
Outer gill raker absent on first gill arch Y. discoloris
4 Eye diameter smaller than interorbital width 5
Eye diameter larger than interorbital width 6
5 Processus dentiformis present on upper jaw Y. paludosus
Processus dentiformis absent on upper jaw Y. yangi
6 Eight inner gill rakers on first gill arch Y. analis
Ten inner gill rakers on first gill arch Y. beipanjiangensis
7 Posterior trunk covered by scales 8
Whole body covered by scales except head 11
8 Caudal fin forked, outer gill raker present on first gill arch Y. macrositanus
Caudal fin emarginated, outer gill raker absent on first gill arch 9
9 Processus dentiformis absent on upper jaw Y. sichuanensis
Processus dentiformis present on upper jaw 10
10 Interorbital width less than 25% of lateral head length, caudal peduncle length larger than 130% of its depth Y. nanpanjiangensis
Interorbital width larger than 26% of lateral head length, caudal peduncle length smaller than its depth Y. elakatis
11 Eye diameter larger than interorbital width 12
Eye diameter smaller than interorbital 13
12 Processus dentiformis absent on upper jaw; eight inner gill rakers on first gill arch Y. jiuchiensis
Processus dentiformis present on upper jaw, 10–12 inner gill rakers on first gill arch Y. longiballa
13 Outer gill raker present on first gill arch 14
Outer gill raker absent on first gill arch 15
14 Predorsal length 55%–58% of SL; 14–15 inner gill rakers on first gill arch Y. macrolepis
Predorsal length 51%–55% of SL; 11–12 inner gill rakers on first gill arch Y. spanisbripes
15 Processus dentiformis absent on upper jaw 16
Processus dentiformis present on upper jaw 17
16 Ventral area between pectoral and pelvic fins scaleless Y. chuanheensis
Ventral area between pectoral and pelvic fins covered by scales Y. polylepis sp. nov.
17 12–13 branched pectoral fin rays; eye diameter less than 12% of lateral head length Y. macrogaster
Ten or eleven branched pectoral fin rays; eye diameter larger than 17% of lateral head length 18
18 10–13 inner gill rakers on first gill arch; six branched pelvic fin rays Y. pleurotaenia
Eight or nine inner gill rakers on first gill arch; seven branched pelvic fin rays Y. parvus

Discussion

Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov. possesses typical characteristics of the genus Yunnanilus, including an inferior mouth, anterior and posterior nostrils separated, a tube-shaped base of anterior nostrils that is not elongated into a barbel-like structure, and lateral line and cephalic lateral-line canals present (Du et al. 2021, 2023).

To date, 20 species of Yunnanilus, including the newly described species, have been recorded from the Yunnan and Sichuan provinces. Among these species, 12 occur in the Nanpanjiang River (Y. analis Yang, 1990, Y. chui Yang, 1991, Y. elakatis Cao & Zhu, 1989, Y. forkicaudalis Li, 1999, Y. macrogaster Kottelat & Chu, 1988, Y. macrolepis Li, Tao & Mao, 2000, Y. macrositanus Li, 1999, Y. nanpanjiangensis Li, Tao & Lu, 1994, Y. paludosus Kottelat & Chu, 1988, Y. parvus Kottelat & Chu, 1988, Y. yangi He et al., 2024, and Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov.), six occur in the Yangtze River (Y. discoloris Zhou & He, 1989, Y. jiuchiensis Du, Hou, Chen & Yang, 2018, Y. longibulla Yang, 1990, Y. pleurotaenia (Regan, 1904), Y. sichuanensis Ding, 1995, and Y. spanisbripes An, Liu & Li, 2009), and one species each occurs in the Beipanjiang (Y. beipanjiangensis Li, Mao & Sun, 1994) and Honghe rivers (Y. chuanheensis Jiang, Zhao, Du & Wang, 2021). Within the genus, Y. analis, Y. beipanjiangensis, Y. chui, Y. discoloris, Y. forkicaudalis, Y. paludosus, and Y. yangi are characterized by the absence of scales, while Y. elakatis, Y. macrositanus, and Y. nanpanjiangensis are characterized by scales exclusively present on the caudal peduncle. Although Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov., Y. chuanheensis, Y. jiuchiensis, Y. longibulla, Y. macrogaster, Y. macrolepis, Y. parvus, Y. pleurotaenia, and Y. spanisbripes share the character of bodies covered by scales, Y. chuanheensis and Y. jiuchiensis are scaleless between the pectoral-fin and pelvic-fin bases. Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov. can be further distinguished from Y. chuanheensis by six branched pelvic fin rays (vs. seven) and from Y. jiuchiensis by 10 inner gill rakers on the first gill arch (vs. eight) and an eye diameter smaller than the interorbital width (vs. larger). Yunnanilus polylepis sp. nov. can be distinguished from Y. longibulla, Y. macrogaster, Y. macrolepis, Y. parvus, Y. pleurotaenia, and Y. spanisbripes by processus dentiformis absent (vs. present). It can be further distinguished from Y. longibulla by eye diameter smaller than interorbital width (vs. larger), six branched pelvic fin rays (vs. seven or eight), caudal peduncle depth 12%–14% of SL (vs. 8%–10%), from Y. macrolepis and Y. spanisbripes by outer gill raker absent on first gill arch (vs. present), predorsal length 51%–55% of SL (vs. 56%–58% in Y. macrolepis), preanal length 73%–78% of SL (vs. 80%–82% in Y. macrolepis, 79%–82% in Y. spanisbripes), from Y. macrogaster by 10–11 branched pectoral fin rays (vs. 12 or 13), six branched pelvic fin rays (vs. seven), 10 inner gill rakers on first gill arch (vs. 13), body height 16%–20% of SL (vs. 22%–23%), eye diameter 17%–27% of lateral head length (vs. 12%), and from Y. parvus by nine branched dorsal fin rays (vs. eight), six branched pelvic fin rays (vs. seven), body height 15%–20% of SL (vs. 20%–23%).

Based on phylogenetic analysis, Y. analis was clustered with Y. pleurotaenia. However, due to the ambiguous geographical origin of Y. analis in GenBank (MW729320), its validity is not discussed in this study. Although molecular evidence from He et al. (2024) supported that Y. yangi belongs to Yunnanilus, the wrong sequence of niger was used in this publication (Du et al. 2023). Additionally, the phylogenetic tree weakly supported Y. yangi as a sister group to Eonemachilus; hence, the phylogenetic relationship between Eonemachilus and Yunnanilus will be discussed in the future. Despite the widespread distribution of Y. pleurotaenia, the majority of Yunnanilus species are restricted to more localized environments and habitats, including small ponds, streams, and lakes. While our phylogenetic analysis sheds light on the complex relationships among Yunnanilus species, it also underscores the urgency of addressing the environmental threats that jeopardize their survival, especially given their generally restricted distribution. Overfishing, agricultural runoff and siltation, organic pollution, habitat degradation, and increasing droughts have profoundly affected these endemic species. Notably, Jin et al. (2018) highlighted that the frequency, intensity, and impact of regional droughts have increased in Yunnan in recent years, with a particularly severe drought occurring in the spring and early summer of 2019 due to an abnormally delayed rainy season (Ding and Gao 2020). However, the specific effects of such droughts on the Yunnanilus population remain uncertain. Future studies focusing on taxonomic classification, biodiversity surveillance, and conservation assessments are deemed essential.

Nomenclatural acts registration

The electronic version of this article in portable document format represents a published work according to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN), and hence the new name contained in the electronic version is effectively published under the Code in the electronic edition alone (see Articles 8.5–8.6 of the Code). This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) and can be resolved, and the associated information can be viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix http://zoobank.org/.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Z.-X. Q. and L.-N.D. measured the specimens, analyzed the data, conceived and designed the study, and prepared the manuscript. W.-H. S. analyzed the molecular data and constructed the phylogenetic tree. Z.-X. W. provided funding for the field survey. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation Project (2022GXNSFAA035563) and the Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, China (ERESEP2022Z05). We are grateful to C. S. Yang for collecting specimens. We thank H. J. Chen for providing the living photographs of this species.

References

  • Ding T, Gao H (2020) The record-breaking extreme drought in Yunnan Province, Southwest China during spring-early summer of 2019 and possible causes. Journal of Meteorological Research 34(5): 997–1012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-0032-8
  • Du LN, Yang J, Min R, Chen XY, Yang JX (2021) A review of the Cypriniform tribe Yunnanilini Prokofiev, 2010 from China, with an emphasis on five genera based on morphologies and complete mitochondrial genomes of some species. Zoological Research 42(3): 310–334. https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2020.229
  • Du LN, Li SJ, Xu F, Luo T, Luo FG, Yu GH, Zhou J (2023) Clarification of Phylogenetic Relationships among Chinese Nemacheilids with Tube-Shaped Anterior Nostrils, with a Description of a New Genus and Two New Species. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 2023: 3600085. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3600085
  • He YR, Li XR, Che XJ, Yang XJ, Wang JS, Wang M (2024) A new species of Yunnanilus (Cypriniformes: Nemacheilidae) from upper Pearl River, Yunnan, China. Zootaxa 5428(2): 194–206. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.2
  • Kottelat M (1990) Indochinese nemacheilines: A revision of nemacheiline loaches (Pisces: Cypriniformes) of Thailand, Burma, Laos, Cambodia and southern Viet Nam. Druckerei braunstein, München. Indochinese Nemacheilines, 262 pp.
  • Kottelat M, Chu XL (1988) Revision of Yunnanilus with descriptions of a miniature species flock and six new species from China (Cypriniformes: Homalopteridae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 23(1–2): 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00000739
  • Luo T, Yang Q, Wu L, Wang YL, Zhou JJ, Deng HQ, Xiao N, Zhou J (2023) Phylogenetic relationships of Nemacheilidae cavefish (Heminoemacheilus, Oreonectes, Yunnanilus, Paranemachilus, and Troglonectes) revealed by analysis of mitochondrial genome and seven nuclear genes. Zoological Research 44(4): 693–697. https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2022.266
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) 2010: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Yang JX, Chen YR (1995) The biology and resource utilization of the fishes of Fuxian Lake, Yunnan. Yunnan Science and Technology Press, Kunming, China, 224 pp.

1Qin Z-X and Shao W-H contributed equally to this work.
login to comment